Suppr超能文献

心脏停搏液类型是否会影响术中血糖水平?一项倾向匹配分析。

Does the Type of Cardioplegia Solution Affect Intraoperative Glucose Levels? A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

作者信息

Mongero Linda B, Tesdahl Eric A, Stammers Alfred H, Stasko Andrew J, Weinstein Samuel

机构信息

Medical Department, SpecialtyCare, Inc., Nashville, Tennessee.

出版信息

J Extra Corpor Technol. 2018 Mar;50(1):44-52.

Abstract

Myocardial protection during cardiac surgery is a multifaceted process that is structured to limit injury and preserve function. Evolving techniques use solutions with varying constituents that enter the systemic circulation and alter intrinsic systemic concentrations. This study compared two distinct cardioplegia solutions on affecting intraoperative glucose levels. Data were abstracted from a multi-institutional perfusion registry, including a total of 1,188 propensity-matched cases performed from January through October 2016, at 17 cardiac surgical centers across the United States in which both del Nido and 4:1 cardioplegia were used during the study period. Covariate data included insulin administration, crystalloid cardioplegia volume, diabetes history, glucose at operating room entry, and nine additional variables. Primary and secondary endpoints were the highest intraoperative glucose level and maximum glucose in excess of 180 mg/dL. Mixed-effects multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to assess the primary and secondary endpoints, respectively, allowing for statistical control of center and surgeon effects. Greater median crystalloid cardioplegia volume was given in the del Nido group (n = 594) 1,040 mL [interquartile range (IQR) = {800, 1,339}] compared with the 4:1 group (n = 594) 466 mL [IQR = {360, 660}] in the 4:1 group ( < .001) despite these groups being statistically indistinguishable in terms of bypass and cross-clamp times as well as seven other patient covariates. More patients required intraoperative insulin drip in the 4:1 group compared with del Nido (65.7% vs. 56.2%, < .001). Multivariable linear mixed-effects analysis yielded an estimated maximum intraoperative glucose for the del Nido group of 177.8 mg/dL compared with that of the 4:1 group, 183.5 mg/dL-a statistically significant reduction of 5.7 mg/dL ( = .03). Multivariable logistic mixed-effects analysis showed a statistically nonsignificant reduction in the likelihood of crossing the 180 mg/dL threshold for del Nido compared with 4:1 (odds ratio [OR] = .79, = .214). After controlling for known confounding variables, intraoperative maximum glucose levels for the del Nido group were 5.7 mg/dL lower than that of the 4:1 group; there was limited evidence suggesting a difference between methods in the likelihood of exceeding the threshold of 180 mg/dL intraoperatively. Further research is warranted to examine the differential effects of cardioplegia solution on intraoperative glucose levels.

摘要

心脏手术期间的心肌保护是一个多方面的过程,其目的是限制损伤并维持功能。不断发展的技术使用含有不同成分的溶液,这些溶液进入体循环并改变体内固有浓度。本研究比较了两种不同的心脏停搏液对术中血糖水平的影响。数据取自一个多机构灌注登记处,包括2016年1月至10月在美国17个心脏外科中心进行的总共1188例倾向匹配病例,在研究期间同时使用了德尔尼多(del Nido)心脏停搏液和4:1心脏停搏液。协变量数据包括胰岛素给药、晶体心脏停搏液体积、糖尿病史、手术室入室时的血糖以及另外九个变量。主要和次要终点分别是术中最高血糖水平和超过180mg/dL的最高血糖。使用混合效应多变量线性和逻辑回归模型分别评估主要和次要终点,从而对中心和外科医生的影响进行统计控制。德尔尼多组(n = 594)给予的晶体心脏停搏液中位数体积更大,为1040mL[四分位间距(IQR)={800, 1339}],而4:1组(n = 594)为466mL[IQR = {360, 660}](P <.001),尽管这些组在体外循环和主动脉阻断时间以及其他七个患者协变量方面在统计学上无差异。与德尔尼多组相比,4:1组更多患者术中需要静脉输注胰岛素(65.7%对56.2%,P <.001)。多变量线性混合效应分析得出德尔尼多组术中估计最高血糖为177.8mg/dL,而4:1组为183.5mg/dL——统计学上显著降低了5.7mg/dL(P =.03)。多变量逻辑混合效应分析显示,与4:1组相比,德尔尼多组超过180mg/dL阈值的可能性在统计学上有不显著的降低(优势比[OR]=.79,P =.214)。在控制已知的混杂变量后,德尔尼多组术中最高血糖水平比4:1组低5.7mg/dL;仅有有限证据表明两种方法在术中超过180mg/dL阈值的可能性方面存在差异。有必要进行进一步研究以检验心脏停搏液对术中血糖水平的不同影响。

相似文献

3
del Nido versus Buckberg cardioplegia in adult isolated valve surgery.del Nido 与 Buckberg 心脏停搏液在成人孤立瓣膜手术中的应用比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Feb;149(2):626-634; discussion 634-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.10.085. Epub 2014 Oct 22.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验