• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies.倾向得分法在观察性研究中减少混杂效应的介绍
Multivariate Behav Res. 2011 May;46(3):399-424. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.568786. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
2
The relative ability of different propensity score methods to balance measured covariates between treated and untreated subjects in observational studies.在观察性研究中,不同倾向评分方法在治疗和未治疗受试者之间平衡测量协变量的相对能力。
Med Decis Making. 2009 Nov-Dec;29(6):661-77. doi: 10.1177/0272989X09341755. Epub 2009 Aug 14.
3
Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies.在观察性研究中,利用倾向得分采用治疗权重的逆概率(IPTW)估计因果治疗效果时,朝着最佳实践迈进。
Stat Med. 2015 Dec 10;34(28):3661-79. doi: 10.1002/sim.6607. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
4
Goodness-of-fit diagnostics for the propensity score model when estimating treatment effects using covariate adjustment with the propensity score.在使用倾向得分进行协变量调整来估计治疗效果时,倾向得分模型的拟合优度诊断。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Dec;17(12):1202-17. doi: 10.1002/pds.1673.
5
Propensity score analysis methods with balancing constraints: A Monte Carlo study.带平衡约束的倾向评分分析方法:一项蒙特卡罗研究。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Apr;30(4):1119-1142. doi: 10.1177/0962280220983512. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
6
The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments.倾向评分方法在生存或事件发生时间结局中的应用:报告与随机试验中使用的效应测量指标相似的指标。
Stat Med. 2014 Mar 30;33(7):1242-58. doi: 10.1002/sim.5984. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
7
Propensity Score Methods: Theory and Practice for Anesthesia Research.倾向评分方法:麻醉研究的理论与实践。
Anesth Analg. 2018 Oct;127(4):1074-1084. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002920.
8
Assessing balance in measured baseline covariates when using many-to-one matching on the propensity-score.在倾向得分进行多对一匹配时评估测量的基线协变量中的平衡。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Dec;17(12):1218-25. doi: 10.1002/pds.1674.
9
The performance of inverse probability of treatment weighting and full matching on the propensity score in the presence of model misspecification when estimating the effect of treatment on survival outcomes.在估计治疗对生存结局的影响时,存在模型误设情况下治疗权重逆概率法和倾向得分完全匹配法的表现。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Aug;26(4):1654-1670. doi: 10.1177/0962280215584401. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
10
Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples.平衡诊断用于比较倾向评分匹配样本中治疗组间基线协变量的分布。
Stat Med. 2009 Nov 10;28(25):3083-107. doi: 10.1002/sim.3697.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors and leprosy incidence among contacts in Bangladesh: A multilevel analysis.孟加拉国接触者中的危险因素与麻风发病率:一项多层次分析。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025 Sep 5;19(9):e0013465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013465. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Comparison of early and intermediate-term outcomes between hybrid arch debranching and total arch replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity-matched studies.杂交主动脉弓去分支术与全主动脉弓置换术的早期和中期结果比较:倾向匹配研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 4;20(9):e0314341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314341. eCollection 2025.
3
Effect of planned preoperative oral care implemented at least 2 weeks before surgery on postoperative infections: A single-center retrospective observational study.术前至少2周实施的计划性口腔护理对术后感染的影响:一项单中心回顾性观察研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 3;20(9):e0330165. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330165. eCollection 2025.
4
Middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma: Does statin therapy improve outcomes? A propensity score-matched analysis.慢性硬膜下血肿的脑膜中动脉栓塞术:他汀类药物治疗能否改善预后?一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2025 Sep 3:15910199251370837. doi: 10.1177/15910199251370837.
5
Mobile App-Assisted Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Type 2 Diabetes in Ningbo, China: 12-Month Retrospective Cohort Study.中国宁波2型糖尿病患者移动应用辅助血糖自我监测:12个月回顾性队列研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Sep 2;13:e65919. doi: 10.2196/65919.
6
Effectiveness of Washington State's hub and spoke model to improve opioid use disorder outcomes.华盛顿州枢纽辐射模式改善阿片类药物使用障碍治疗效果的有效性。
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Aug 7;3(8):qxaf157. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf157. eCollection 2025 Aug.
7
Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate and Risk of Meningioma in the US.美国醋酸甲羟孕酮长效注射剂与脑膜瘤风险
JAMA Neurol. 2025 Sep 2. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.3011.
8
Efficacy and safety of first-line chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer patients: a real-world propensity score matching study.一线化疗联合免疫检查点抑制剂治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌患者的疗效与安全性:一项真实世界倾向评分匹配研究
Front Immunol. 2025 Aug 13;16:1562458. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1562458. eCollection 2025.
9
Propensity score weighting with survey weighted data when outcomes are binary: a simulation study.当结局为二元变量时,使用调查加权数据进行倾向得分加权:一项模拟研究。
Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2024 Sep;24(3):327-347. doi: 10.1007/s10742-023-00317-y. Epub 2023 Nov 18.
10
Impact of early enteral nutrition on the prognosis of mechanically ventilated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a retrospective cohort study based on the MIMIC-IV Database.早期肠内营养对慢性阻塞性肺疾病机械通气患者预后的影响:一项基于MIMIC-IV数据库的回顾性队列研究
Front Nutr. 2025 Aug 13;12:1620011. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1620011. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
A Tutorial and Case Study in Propensity Score Analysis: An Application to Estimating the Effect of In-Hospital Smoking Cessation Counseling on Mortality.倾向得分分析教程与案例研究:应用于估计住院戒烟咨询对死亡率的影响
Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46(1):119-151. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.540480.
2
Comparing paired vs non-paired statistical methods of analyses when making inferences about absolute risk reductions in propensity-score matched samples.比较配对与非配对统计分析方法在倾向评分匹配样本中进行绝对风险降低推断时的效果。
Stat Med. 2011 May 20;30(11):1292-301. doi: 10.1002/sim.4200. Epub 2011 Feb 21.
3
Type I error rates, coverage of confidence intervals, and variance estimation in propensity-score matched analyses.倾向得分匹配分析中的I型错误率、置信区间覆盖范围和方差估计
Int J Biostat. 2009 Apr 14;5(1):Article 13. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1146.
4
Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies.在观察性研究中估计均值差异和比例差异时,倾向得分匹配的最佳卡尺宽度。
Pharm Stat. 2011 Mar-Apr;10(2):150-61. doi: 10.1002/pst.433.
5
The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating differences in proportions (risk differences or absolute risk reductions) in observational studies.不同倾向评分法在观察性研究中估计比例差异(风险差异或绝对风险降低)的表现。
Stat Med. 2010 Sep 10;29(20):2137-48. doi: 10.1002/sim.3854.
6
Primer on statistical interpretation or methods report card on propensity-score matching in the cardiology literature from 2004 to 2006: a systematic review.2004年至2006年心脏病学文献中倾向评分匹配的统计解释或方法报告卡入门:一项系统评价
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2008 Sep;1(1):62-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.790634.
7
Improving propensity score weighting using machine learning.使用机器学习改进倾向评分加权。
Stat Med. 2010 Feb 10;29(3):337-46. doi: 10.1002/sim.3782.
8
Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples.平衡诊断用于比较倾向评分匹配样本中治疗组间基线协变量的分布。
Stat Med. 2009 Nov 10;28(25):3083-107. doi: 10.1002/sim.3697.
9
The relative ability of different propensity score methods to balance measured covariates between treated and untreated subjects in observational studies.在观察性研究中,不同倾向评分方法在治疗和未治疗受试者之间平衡测量协变量的相对能力。
Med Decis Making. 2009 Nov-Dec;29(6):661-77. doi: 10.1177/0272989X09341755. Epub 2009 Aug 14.
10
Using propensity scores to adjust for selection bias when assessing the effectiveness of Alcoholics Anonymous in observational studies.在观察性研究中评估匿名戒酒会的有效性时,使用倾向得分来调整选择偏倚。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Sep 1;104(1-2):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.03.018. Epub 2009 May 20.

倾向得分法在观察性研究中减少混杂效应的介绍

An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies.

作者信息

Austin Peter C

机构信息

Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Department of Health Management, Policy and Evaluation, University of Toronto.

出版信息

Multivariate Behav Res. 2011 May;46(3):399-424. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.568786. Epub 2011 Jun 8.

DOI:10.1080/00273171.2011.568786
PMID:21818162
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3144483/
Abstract

The propensity score is the probability of treatment assignment conditional on observed baseline characteristics. The propensity score allows one to design and analyze an observational (nonrandomized) study so that it mimics some of the particular characteristics of a randomized controlled trial. In particular, the propensity score is a balancing score: conditional on the propensity score, the distribution of observed baseline covariates will be similar between treated and untreated subjects. I describe 4 different propensity score methods: matching on the propensity score, stratification on the propensity score, inverse probability of treatment weighting using the propensity score, and covariate adjustment using the propensity score. I describe balance diagnostics for examining whether the propensity score model has been adequately specified. Furthermore, I discuss differences between regression-based methods and propensity score-based methods for the analysis of observational data. I describe different causal average treatment effects and their relationship with propensity score analyses.

摘要

倾向得分是基于观察到的基线特征进行治疗分配的概率。倾向得分使人们能够设计和分析一项观察性(非随机)研究,使其模仿随机对照试验的一些特定特征。具体而言,倾向得分是一个平衡得分:在倾向得分的条件下,治疗组和未治疗组受试者观察到的基线协变量分布将相似。我描述了4种不同的倾向得分方法:基于倾向得分进行匹配、基于倾向得分进行分层、使用倾向得分进行治疗加权的逆概率法以及使用倾向得分进行协变量调整。我描述了用于检查倾向得分模型是否已得到充分设定的平衡诊断方法。此外,我讨论了基于回归的方法和基于倾向得分的方法在观察性数据分析中的差异。我描述了不同的因果平均治疗效果及其与倾向得分分析的关系。