Suppr超能文献

加利福尼亚州心脏骤停区域化的差异。

Variations in Cardiac Arrest Regionalization in California.

机构信息

University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Francisco, California.

Los Angeles County Emergency Medical Service Agency, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;19(2):259-265. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.10.34869. Epub 2018 Feb 19.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The development of cardiac arrest centers and regionalization of systems of care may improve survival of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). This survey of the local EMS agencies (LEMSA) in California was intended to determine current practices regarding the treatment and routing of OHCA patients and the extent to which EMS systems have regionalized OHCA care across California.

METHODS

We surveyed all of the 33 LEMSA in California regarding the treatment and routing of OHCA patients according to the current recommendations for OHCA management.

RESULTS

Two counties, representing 29% of the California population, have formally regionalized cardiac arrest care. Twenty of the remaining LEMSA have specific regionalization protocols to direct all OHCA patients with return of spontaneous circulation to designated percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-capable hospitals, representing another 36% of the population. There is large variation in LEMSA ability to influence inhospital care. Only 14 agencies (36%), representing 44% of the population, have access to hospital outcome data, including survival to hospital discharge and cerebral performance category scores.

CONCLUSION

Regionalized care of OHCA is established in two of 33 California LEMSA, providing access to approximately one-third of California residents. Many other LEMSA direct OHCA patients to PCI-capable hospitals for primary PCI and targeted temperature management, but there is limited regional coordination and system quality improvement. Only one-third of LEMSA have access to hospital data for patient outcomes.

摘要

引言

心脏骤停中心的发展和医疗体系的区域化可能会提高院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者的生存率。本研究对加利福尼亚州的当地紧急医疗服务机构(LEMSA)进行了调查,旨在确定目前关于 OHCA 患者的治疗和转院的实践情况,以及 EMS 系统在多大程度上实现了加利福尼亚州 OHCA 治疗的区域化。

方法

我们根据目前 OHCA 管理的建议,对加利福尼亚州的 33 个 LEMSA 中的每一个都进行了 OHCA 患者治疗和转院的调查。

结果

有两个县,占加利福尼亚州人口的 29%,已经正式实现了心脏骤停治疗的区域化。其余 20 个 LEMSA 中有特定的区域化协议,将所有出现自主循环恢复的 OHCA 患者转往指定的经皮冠状动脉介入(PCI)能力医院,这代表了另外 36%的人口。LEMSA 影响院内治疗的能力存在很大差异。只有 14 个机构(36%),占人口的 44%,可以获得医院结局数据,包括生存至出院和脑功能表现评分。

结论

在加利福尼亚州的 33 个 LEMSA 中,有两个已经建立了 OHCA 的区域化治疗,为大约三分之一的加利福尼亚居民提供了服务。许多其他 LEMSA 将 OHCA 患者转往 PCI 能力医院进行主要 PCI 和目标温度管理,但区域协调和系统质量改进有限。只有三分之一的 LEMSA 可以获得患者结局的医院数据。

相似文献

1
Variations in Cardiac Arrest Regionalization in California.加利福尼亚州心脏骤停区域化的差异。
West J Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;19(2):259-265. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.10.34869. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
2
Availability and utilization of cardiac resuscitation centers.心脏复苏中心的可及性与利用率
West J Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;15(7):758-63. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.8.21877. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
9
Variation in Post-Cardiac Arrest Care Within a Regional EMS System.心脏骤停后护理在区域 EMS 系统内的差异。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2022 Nov-Dec;26(6):772-781. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2021.1965681. Epub 2021 Aug 24.

本文引用的文献

5
Acute Stroke: Current Evidence-based Recommendations for Prehospital Care.急性中风:院前护理的当前循证推荐
West J Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;17(2):104-28. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.12.28995. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
9
Availability and utilization of cardiac resuscitation centers.心脏复苏中心的可及性与利用率
West J Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;15(7):758-63. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.8.21877. Epub 2014 Sep 19.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验