• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科幻与人类增强:电影《时间规划局》(2011年)中的激进寿命延长

Science fiction and human enhancement: radical life-extension in the movie 'In Time' (2011).

作者信息

Roduit Johann A R, Eichinger Tobias, Glannon Walter

机构信息

Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 30, 8006, Zürich, Switzerland.

Department of Philosophy, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.

出版信息

Med Health Care Philos. 2018 Sep;21(3):287-293. doi: 10.1007/s11019-018-9831-4.

DOI:10.1007/s11019-018-9831-4
PMID:29560602
Abstract

The ethics of human enhancement has been a hotly debated topic in the last 15 years. In this debate, some advocate examining science fiction stories to elucidate the ethical issues regarding the current phenomenon of human enhancement. Stories from science fiction seem well suited to analyze biomedical advances, providing some possible case studies. Of particular interest is the work of screenwriter Andrew Niccol (Gattaca, S1m0ne, In Time, and Good Kill), which often focuses on ethical questions raised by the use of new technologies. Examining the movie In Time (2011), the aim of this paper is to show how science fiction can contribute to the ethical debate of human enhancement. In Time provides an interesting case study to explore what could be some of the consequences of radical life-extension technologies. In this paper, we will show how arguments regarding radical life-extension portrayed in this particular movie differ from what is found in the scientific literature. We will see how In Time gives flesh to arguments defending or rejecting radical life-extension. It articulates feelings of unease, alienation and boredom associated with this possibility. Finally, this article will conclude that science fiction movies in general, and In Time in particular, are a valuable resource for a broad and comprehensive debate about our coming future.

摘要

在过去15年里,人类增强伦理一直是一个备受争议的热门话题。在这场辩论中,一些人主张通过审视科幻小说来阐明与当前人类增强现象相关的伦理问题。科幻小说似乎非常适合分析生物医学进展,能提供一些可能的案例研究。编剧安德鲁·尼科尔(《千钧一发》《西蒙妮》《时间规划局》和《善意杀戮》)的作品尤其值得关注,其作品常常聚焦于新技术应用引发的伦理问题。通过审视电影《时间规划局》(2011年),本文旨在展示科幻小说如何能为人类增强的伦理辩论做出贡献。《时间规划局》提供了一个有趣的案例研究,以探讨激进的寿命延长技术可能带来的一些后果。在本文中,我们将展示这部特定电影中描绘的关于激进寿命延长的论点与科学文献中的论点有何不同。我们将看到《时间规划局》如何使支持或反对激进寿命延长的论点变得具体可感。它阐述了与这种可能性相关的不安、疏离和无聊的感觉。最后,本文将得出结论,一般而言科幻电影,尤其是《时间规划局》,是就我们即将到来的未来展开广泛而全面辩论的宝贵资源。

相似文献

1
Science fiction and human enhancement: radical life-extension in the movie 'In Time' (2011).科幻与人类增强:电影《时间规划局》(2011年)中的激进寿命延长
Med Health Care Philos. 2018 Sep;21(3):287-293. doi: 10.1007/s11019-018-9831-4.
2
Transformative change in Invasion of the Body Snatchers.
Med Health Care Philos. 2018 Sep;21(3):279-286. doi: 10.1007/s11019-017-9804-z.
3
Sexism and human enhancement.
J Med Ethics. 2013 Dec;39(12):732-5. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101143. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
4
Science fiction authors' perspectives on human genetic engineering.科幻小说作家对人类基因工程的看法。
Med Humanit. 2022 Sep;48(3):285-297. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2020-012041. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
5
Defending human enhancement technologies: unveiling normativity.捍卫人类增强技术:揭示规范性。
J Med Ethics. 2010 Aug;36(8):483-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.036095.
6
Life extension and the burden of mortality: Leon Kass versus John Harris.寿命延长与死亡率负担:利昂·卡斯与约翰·哈里斯的观点交锋。
J Med Ethics. 2014 May;40(5):336-40. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101438. Epub 2013 May 22.
7
Limitless as a neuro-pharmaceutical experiment and as a Daseinsanalyse: on the use of fiction in preparatory debates on cognitive enhancement.
Med Health Care Philos. 2014 Feb;17(1):29-38. doi: 10.1007/s11019-013-9481-5.
8
Ethical concerns in the community about technologies to extend human life span.社区对延长人类寿命的技术的伦理关注。
Am J Bioeth. 2009 Dec;9(12):68-76. doi: 10.1080/15265160903318368.
9
Enhancement and human nature: the case of Sandel.增强与人性:以桑德尔为例。
J Med Ethics. 2009 Jun;35(6):354-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.028423.
10
Sexual dimorphism and human enhancement.性别二态性与人类增强。
J Med Ethics. 2013 Dec;39(12):722-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100422. Epub 2012 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Weak transhumanism: moderate enhancement as a non-radical path to radical enhancement.弱(transhumanism):作为激进增强的非激进路径的适度增强。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2023 Jun;44(3):229-248. doi: 10.1007/s11017-023-09606-6. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
2
Science fiction and bioethics.科幻小说与生物伦理学。
Med Health Care Philos. 2018 Sep;21(3):277-278. doi: 10.1007/s11019-018-9848-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Ending Aging: The Rejuvenation Breakthroughs That Could Reverse Human Aging in Our Lifetime.《终结衰老:有望在我们有生之年逆转人类衰老的复兴突破》
J Women Aging. 2018 Mar-Apr;30(2):180-181. doi: 10.1080/08952841.2017.1366751. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
2
Ideas of Perfection and the Ethics of Human Enhancement.完美理念与人类增强伦理
Bioethics. 2015 Nov;29(9):622-30. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12192.
3
Evaluating human enhancements: the importance of ideals.评估人类增强:理想的重要性。
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2014 Sep-Dec;32(3-4):205-16. doi: 10.1007/s40592-015-0027-x.
4
Autonomy and Enhancement.自主性与增强
Neuroethics. 2014;7(2):123-136. doi: 10.1007/s12152-013-9189-5. Epub 2013 Aug 17.
5
Human enhancement and perfection.人类增强与完善。
J Med Ethics. 2013 Oct;39(10):647-50. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100920. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
6
Genetic enhancement, human nature, and rights.基因增强、人性与权利。
J Med Philos. 2010 Aug;35(4):415-28. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhq034. Epub 2010 Jul 16.
7
The ethics of self-change: becoming oneself by way of antidepressants or psychotherapy?自我改变的伦理:通过抗抑郁药或心理治疗成为自己?
Med Health Care Philos. 2009 Jun;12(2):169-78. doi: 10.1007/s11019-009-9190-2. Epub 2009 Feb 25.
8
Liberal eugenics and human nature. Against Habermas.自由优生学与人性。驳哈贝马斯。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2006 Nov-Dec;36(6):35-42. doi: 10.1353/hcr.2006.0093.
9
Authenticity and ambivalence: toward understanding the enhancement debate.真实性与矛盾性:迈向对增强辩论的理解
Hastings Cent Rep. 2005 May-Jun;35(3):34-41.
10
Enhancement technologies and human identity.增强技术与人类身份。
J Med Philos. 2005 Jun;30(3):261-83. doi: 10.1080/03605310590960166.