Holden A C L
Dental Ethics, Law and Professionalism, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Sydney, 2-6 Chalmers Street, Surry Hills, NSW, 2061, Australia.
Med Health Care Philos. 2018 Dec;21(4):583-589. doi: 10.1007/s11019-018-9834-1.
The rise and persistence of a commercial model of healthcare and the potential shift towards the commodification of dental services, provided to consumers, should provoke thought about the nature and purpose of dentistry and whether this paradigm is cause for concern. Within this article, whether dentistry is a commodity and the legitimacy of dentistry as a business is explored and assessed. Dentistry is perceived to be a commodity, dependent upon the context of how services are to be provided and the interpretation of the patient-professional relationship. Commercially-focused practices threaten the fiduciary nature of the interaction between consumer and provider. The solution to managing commercial elements within dentistry is not through rejection of the new paradigm of the consumer of dental services, but in the rejection of competitive practices, coercive advertising and the erosion of professional values and duty. Consumerism may bring empowerment to those accessing dental services. However, if the patient-practitioner relationship is reduced to a mere transaction in the name of enhanced consumer participation, this empowerment is but a myth.
医疗保健商业模式的兴起与持续存在,以及向提供给消费者的牙科服务商品化的潜在转变,应该引发人们对牙科的性质和目的以及这种范式是否令人担忧的思考。在本文中,探讨并评估了牙科是否是一种商品以及牙科作为一种商业的合法性。牙科是否被视为一种商品,取决于服务提供方式的背景以及对医患关系的解读。以商业为重点的做法威胁到消费者与提供者之间互动的信托性质。管理牙科商业元素的解决方案不是拒绝牙科服务消费者的新范式,而是拒绝竞争行为、强制广告以及专业价值观和职责的侵蚀。消费主义可能会给那些获得牙科服务的人带来权力。然而,如果医患关系仅仅以增强消费者参与的名义沦为一种交易,这种权力不过是一个神话。