1 The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Aug;44(8):1147-1162. doi: 10.1177/0146167218760800. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
Conceptual analyses of moral cognition suggest that different variables may influence moral judgments depending upon the target's age. Five experiments (total N = 1,733) tested the implications for moral judgments about adults and young children. Results show that adults who were perceived to be more cognitively capable were judged to have greater moral rights and their transgressions were judged less harshly, but young children who were perceived to be more cognitively capable were judged to have fewer moral rights and their transgressions were judged more harshly. In addition, the perceived intentionality and disgustingness of transgressions had weaker effects on judgments about child transgressors than about adult transgressors. Perceivers' care-giving motives also had diverging effects on moral judgments, predicting more lenient judgments about children's transgressions and harsher judgments about adults' transgressions. These results have novel implications-both conceptual and practical-for moral judgments regarding adults and children.
概念分析表明,道德认知的不同变量可能会根据目标的年龄而影响道德判断。五个实验(总 N = 1733)检验了这些变量对成人和儿童道德判断的影响。结果表明,被认为认知能力更强的成年人被认为拥有更大的道德权利,他们的违规行为被认为不那么严重,但被认为认知能力更强的儿童被认为拥有更少的道德权利,他们的违规行为被认为更严重。此外,违规行为的感知意图和令人反感程度对儿童违规者的判断比对成人违规者的判断的影响要小。感知者的关爱动机也对道德判断产生了不同的影响,预测对儿童违规行为的判断更宽容,对成人违规行为的判断更严厉。这些结果对有关成人和儿童的道德判断具有新颖的概念和实际意义。