University of Trento.
Radboud University.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Mar;31(3):390-400. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01258. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
We internally represent the structure of our surroundings even when there is little layout information available in the visual image, such as when walking through fog or darkness. One way in which we disambiguate such scenes is through object cues; for example, seeing a boat supports the inference that the foggy scene is a lake. Recent studies have investigated the neural mechanisms by which object and scene processing interact to support object perception. The current study examines the reverse interaction by which objects facilitate the neural representation of scene layout. Photographs of indoor (closed) and outdoor (open) real-world scenes were blurred such that they were difficult to categorize on their own but easily disambiguated by the inclusion of an object. fMRI decoding was used to measure scene representations in scene-selective parahippocampal place area (PPA) and occipital place area (OPA). Classifiers were trained to distinguish response patterns to fully visible indoor and outdoor scenes, presented in an independent experiment. Testing these classifiers on blurred scenes revealed a strong improvement in classification in left PPA and OPA when objects were present, despite the reduced low-level visual feature overlap with the training set in this condition. These findings were specific to left PPA/OPA, with no evidence for object-driven facilitation in right PPA/OPA, object-selective areas, and early visual cortex. These findings demonstrate separate roles for left and right scene-selective cortex in scene representation, whereby left PPA/OPA represents inferred scene layout, influenced by contextual object cues, and right PPA/OPA represents a scene's visual features.
即使在视觉图像中可用的布局信息很少,例如在雾或黑暗中行走时,我们也会在内部表示周围环境的结构。我们消除此类场景歧义的一种方法是通过对象线索;例如,看到一艘船支持这样的推断,即有雾的场景是一个湖泊。最近的研究调查了对象和场景处理相互作用以支持对象感知的神经机制。本研究通过对象促进场景布局的神经表示的反向相互作用来检查。室内(封闭)和室外(开放)真实场景的照片变得模糊,以至于仅凭自身难以分类,但通过包含对象很容易消除歧义。使用 fMRI 解码来测量场景选择性旁海马体位置区域 (PPA) 和枕叶位置区域 (OPA) 中的场景表示。在独立实验中,使用分类器来区分完全可见的室内和室外场景的反应模式。在存在对象的情况下,对模糊场景进行这些分类器的测试显示,即使在这种情况下与训练集的低水平视觉特征重叠减少,左 PPA 和 OPA 中的分类也有很大提高。这些发现是左 PPA/OPA 特有的,在右 PPA/OPA、对象选择区域和早期视觉皮层中没有发现对象驱动的促进作用的证据。这些发现表明左和右场景选择性皮质在场景表示中具有单独的作用,其中左 PPA/OPA 表示推断的场景布局,受上下文对象线索的影响,而右 PPA/OPA 表示场景的视觉特征。