Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, 6525 HR, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455.
J Neurosci. 2021 Jan 27;41(4):751-756. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2162-20.2020. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
Natural scenes are characterized by individual objects as well as by global scene properties such as spatial layout. Functional neuroimaging research has shown that this distinction between object and scene processing is one of the main organizing principles of human high-level visual cortex. For example, object-selective regions, including the lateral occipital complex (LOC), were shown to represent object content (but not scene layout), while scene-selective regions, including the occipital place area (OPA), were shown to represent scene layout (but not object content). Causal evidence for a double dissociation between LOC and OPA in representing objects and scenes is currently limited, however. One TMS experiment, conducted in a relatively small sample ( = 13), reported an interaction between LOC and OPA stimulation and object and scene recognition performance (Dilks et al., 2013). Here, we present a high-powered preregistered replication of this study ( = 72, including male and female human participants), using group-average fMRI coordinates to target LOC and OPA. Results revealed unambiguous evidence for a double dissociation between LOC and OPA: relative to vertex stimulation, TMS over LOC selectively impaired the recognition of objects, while TMS over OPA selectively impaired the recognition of scenes. Furthermore, we found that these effects were stable over time and consistent across individual objects and scenes. These results show that LOC and OPA can be reliably and selectively targeted with TMS, even when defined based on group-average fMRI coordinates. More generally, they support the distinction between object and scene processing as an organizing principle of human high-level visual cortex. Our daily-life environments are characterized both by individual objects and by global scene properties. The distinction between object and scene processing features prominently in visual cognitive neuroscience, with fMRI studies showing that this distinction is one of the main organizing principles of human high-level visual cortex. However, causal evidence for the selective involvement of object- and scene-selective regions in processing their preferred category is less conclusive. Here, testing a large sample ( = 72) using an established paradigm and a preregistered protocol, we found that TMS over object-selective cortex (lateral occipital complex) selectively impaired object recognition, while TMS over scene-selective cortex (occipital place area) selectively impaired scene recognition. These results provide strong causal evidence for the distinction between object and scene processing in human visual cortex.
自然场景的特征既有个体物体,也有空间布局等全局场景属性。功能神经影像学研究表明,这种物体和场景处理之间的区别是人类高级视觉皮层的主要组织原则之一。例如,选择性区域包括外侧枕叶复合体(LOC),被证明代表物体内容(但不代表场景布局),而选择性区域包括枕部位置区(OPA),被证明代表场景布局(但不代表物体内容)。然而,目前关于 LOC 和 OPA 在表示物体和场景方面的双重分离的因果证据是有限的。一项在相对较小样本(n=13)中进行的 TMS 实验报告了 LOC 和 OPA 刺激与物体和场景识别性能之间的相互作用(Dilks 等人,2013)。在这里,我们在一个高功率的预注册复制研究(n=72,包括男性和女性人类参与者)中呈现了这一结果,使用群体平均 fMRI 坐标来靶向 LOC 和 OPA。结果明确地证明了 LOC 和 OPA 之间的双重分离:与顶点刺激相比,TMS 对 LOC 的刺激选择性地损害了物体的识别,而 TMS 对 OPA 的刺激选择性地损害了场景的识别。此外,我们发现这些影响在时间上是稳定的,并且在单个物体和场景中是一致的。这些结果表明,即使基于群体平均 fMRI 坐标,LOC 和 OPA 也可以用 TMS 进行可靠和选择性地靶向。更一般地说,它们支持物体和场景处理之间的区别作为人类高级视觉皮层的组织原则。我们的日常生活环境的特征既有个体物体,也有全局场景属性。物体和场景处理之间的区别在视觉认知神经科学中占据突出地位,fMRI 研究表明,这种区别是人类高级视觉皮层的主要组织原则之一。然而,关于物体和场景选择性区域选择性参与其首选类别的因果证据并不那么确凿。在这里,我们使用一个既定的范式和一个预先注册的方案测试了一个大样本(n=72),发现 TMS 对物体选择性皮层(外侧枕叶复合体)的刺激选择性地损害了物体识别,而 TMS 对场景选择性皮层(枕部位置区)的刺激选择性地损害了场景识别。这些结果为人类视觉皮层中物体和场景处理之间的区别提供了有力的因果证据。