Orr Michael F, Lederhos Smith Crystal, Finlay Myles, Martin Samantha C, Brooks Olivia, Oluwoye Oladunni A, Leickly Emily, McDonell Michael, Burduli Ekaterina, Barbosa-Leiker Celestina, Layton Matt, Roll John M, McPherson Sterling M
Department of Medical Education and Clinical Sciences, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine.
Programs of Excellence in Addictions Research.
Behav Pharmacol. 2018 Aug;29(5):462-468. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000379.
Contingency management (CM) is associated with decreases in off-target drug and alcohol use during primary target treatment. The primary hypothesis for this trial was that targeting alcohol use or tobacco smoking would yield increased abstinence in the opposite, nontargeted drug. We used a 2 [CM vs. noncontingent control (NC) for alcohol]×2 (CM vs. NC for smoking tobacco) factorial design, with alcohol intake (through urinary ethyl glucuronide) and tobacco smoking (through urinary cotinine) as the primary outcomes. Thirty-four heavy-drinking smokers were randomized into one of four groups, wherein they received CM, or equivalent NC reinforcement, for alcohol abstinence, smoking abstinence, both drugs, or neither drug. The CM for alcohol and tobacco group had only two participants and therefore was not included in analysis. Compared with the NC for alcohol and tobacco smoking group, both the CM for the tobacco smoking group [odds ratio (OR)=12.03; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.50-96.31] and the CM for the alcohol group (OR=37.55; 95% CI: 4.86-290.17) submitted significantly more tobacco-abstinent urinalyses. Similarly, compared with the NC for the alcohol and tobacco group, both the CM for smoking (OR=2.57; 95% CI: 1.00-6.60) and the CM for alcohol groups (OR=3.96; 95% CI: 1.47-10.62) submitted significantly more alcohol-abstinent urinalyses. These data indicate cross-over effects of CM on indirect treatment targets. Although this is a pilot investigation, it could help to inform the design of novel treatments for alcohol and tobacco co-addiction.
应急管理(CM)与在主要目标治疗期间非目标药物和酒精使用的减少相关。该试验的主要假设是,针对酒精使用或吸烟会使相反的非目标药物的戒断率增加。我们采用了2[酒精使用的CM组与非应急对照组(NC)]×2(吸烟的CM组与NC组)析因设计,将酒精摄入量(通过尿中乙基葡萄糖醛酸)和吸烟量(通过尿中可替宁)作为主要结果。34名重度饮酒吸烟者被随机分为四组之一,他们在其中接受针对戒酒、戒烟、两种药物或不针对任何药物的CM或等效的NC强化治疗。酒精和烟草的CM组只有两名参与者,因此未纳入分析。与酒精和烟草吸烟的NC组相比,吸烟的CM组[优势比(OR)=12.03;95%置信区间(CI):1.50 - 96.31]和酒精的CM组(OR = 37.55;95% CI:4.86 - 290.17)提交的烟草戒断尿液分析显著更多。同样,与酒精和烟草组的NC相比,吸烟的CM组(OR = 2.57;95% CI:1.00 - 6.60)和酒精的CM组(OR = 3.96;95% CI:1.47 - 10.62)提交的酒精戒断尿液分析显著更多。这些数据表明CM对间接治疗目标有交叉效应。尽管这是一项初步调查,但它可能有助于为酒精和烟草共同成瘾的新治疗方法的设计提供信息。