Mikuls Ted R, Walker Clay, Qiu Fang, Yu Fang, Thiele Geoffrey M, Alfant Barnett, Li Eric C, Zhao Lisa Y, Wang Gary P, Datta Susmita, Payne Jeffrey B
Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Medicine, Veterans Affairs Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha, NE, USA.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Jul 1;57(7):1162-1172. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key052.
To profile and compare the subgingival microbiome of RA patients with OA controls.
RA (n = 260) and OA (n = 296) patients underwent full-mouth examination and subgingival samples were collected. Bacterial DNA was profiled using 16 S rRNA Illumina sequencing. Following data filtering and normalization, hierarchical clustering analysis was used to group samples. Multivariable regression was used to examine associations of patient factors with membership in the two largest clusters. Differential abundance between RA and OA was examined using voom method and linear modelling with empirical Bayes moderation (Linear Models for Microarray Analysis, limma), accounting for the effects of periodontitis, race, marital status and smoking.
Alpha diversity indices were similar in RA and OA after accounting for periodontitis. After filtering, 286 taxa were available for analysis. Samples grouped into one of seven clusters with membership sizes of 324, 223, 3, 2, 2, 1 and 1 patients, respectively. RA-OA status was not associated with cluster membership. Factors associated with cluster 1 (vs 2) membership included periodontitis, smoking, marital status and Caucasian race. Accounting for periodontitis, 10 taxa (3.5% of those examined) were in lower abundance in RA than OA. There were no associations between lower abundance taxa or other select taxa examined with RA autoantibody concentrations.
Leveraging data from a large case-control study and accounting for multiple factors known to influence oral health status, results from this study failed to identify a subgingival microbial fingerprint that could reliably discriminate RA from OA patients.
分析并比较类风湿关节炎(RA)患者与骨关节炎(OA)对照者的龈下微生物群。
RA患者(n = 260)和OA患者(n = 296)接受全口检查并采集龈下样本。使用16S rRNA Illumina测序对细菌DNA进行分析。经过数据过滤和标准化后,采用层次聚类分析对样本进行分组。使用多变量回归分析来检验患者因素与两个最大聚类中成员身份的关联。采用voom方法和经验贝叶斯调节线性模型(微阵列分析线性模型,limma)来检验RA和OA之间的差异丰度,并考虑了牙周炎、种族、婚姻状况和吸烟的影响。
在考虑牙周炎因素后,RA和OA的α多样性指数相似。过滤后,有286个分类单元可供分析。样本分为七个聚类之一,每个聚类中的患者数量分别为324、223、3、2、2、1和1。RA - OA状态与聚类成员身份无关。与聚类1(对比聚类2)成员身份相关的因素包括牙周炎、吸烟、婚姻状况和白种人种族。在考虑牙周炎因素后,RA中有10个分类单元(占所检测分类单元的3.5%)的丰度低于OA。所检测的低丰度分类单元或其他选定分类单元与RA自身抗体浓度之间无关联。
利用一项大型病例对照研究的数据并考虑到已知影响口腔健康状况的多种因素,本研究结果未能识别出一种能够可靠地区分RA患者与OA患者的龈下微生物特征。