Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, AP-HP, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Centre d'Infectiologie Necker-Pasteur and Institut Imagine, Paris, France.
Research Group on Bacterial Opportunistic Pathogens and Environment, UMR CNRS5557, INRA1418 Ecologie Microbienne, French Observatory of Nocardiosis, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université de Lyon 1, VetAgro Sup, Lyon, France.
J Clin Microbiol. 2018 May 25;56(6). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00002-18. Print 2018 Jun.
The diagnosis of nocardiosis, a severe opportunistic infection, is challenging. We assessed the specificity and sensitivity of a 16S rRNA PCR-based assay performed on clinical samples. In this multicenter study (January 2014 to April 2015), patients who were admitted to three hospitals and had an underlying condition favoring nocardiosis, clinical and radiological signs consistent with nocardiosis, and a PCR assay result for a clinical sample were included. Patients were classified as negative control (NC) (negative culture results and proven alternative diagnosis or improvement at 6 months without anti- treatment), positive control (PC) (positive culture results), or probable nocardiosis (positive PCR results, negative culture results, and no alternative diagnosis). Sixty-eight patients were included; 47 were classified as NC, 8 as PC, and 13 as probable nocardiosis. PCR results were negative for 35/47 NC patients (74%). For the 12 NC patients with positive PCR results, the PCR assay had been performed with respiratory samples. These NC patients had chronic bronchopulmonary disease more frequently than did the NC patients with negative PCR results (8/12 patients [67%] versus 11/35 patients [31%]; = 0.044). PCR results were positive for 7/8 PC patients (88%). There were 13 cases of probable nocardiosis, diagnosed solely using the PCR results; 9 of those patients (69%) had lung involvement (consolidation or nodule). PCR testing had a specificity of 74% and a sensitivity of 88% for the diagnosis of nocardiosis. PCR testing may be helpful for the diagnosis of nocardiosis in immunocompromised patients but interpretation of PCR results from respiratory samples is difficult, because the PCR assay may also detect colonization.
诺卡氏菌病是一种严重的机会性感染,其诊断具有挑战性。我们评估了基于 16S rRNA PCR 的检测方法在临床样本中的特异性和敏感性。在这项多中心研究(2014 年 1 月至 2015 年 4 月)中,纳入了入住三家医院、有诺卡氏菌病倾向的基础疾病、具有诺卡氏菌病临床和影像学特征、以及临床样本 PCR 检测结果阳性的患者。患者被分为阴性对照(NC)(阴性培养结果和明确的替代诊断或 6 个月无抗治疗时的改善)、阳性对照(PC)(阳性培养结果)或疑似诺卡氏菌病(阳性 PCR 结果、阴性培养结果且无替代诊断)。共纳入 68 例患者;47 例被分类为 NC,8 例为 PC,13 例为疑似诺卡氏菌病。35/47(74%)例 NC 患者的 PCR 结果为阴性。在 12 例 NC 患者中,PCR 结果阳性,PCR 检测使用了呼吸道样本。这些 NC 患者比 PCR 结果阴性的 NC 患者更常患有慢性支气管-肺疾病(8/12 例患者[67%] vs. 11/35 例患者[31%];=0.044)。7/8(88%)例 PC 患者的 PCR 结果为阳性。有 13 例疑似诺卡氏菌病,仅根据 PCR 结果诊断;其中 9 例(69%)患者有肺部受累(实变或结节)。PCR 检测对诺卡氏菌病的诊断特异性为 74%,敏感性为 88%。PCR 检测可能有助于免疫功能低下患者的诺卡氏菌病诊断,但对呼吸道样本的 PCR 结果的解释具有挑战性,因为 PCR 检测也可能检测定植。