Multifaceted interventions improve medication adherence and reduce acute hospitalization rates in medicaid patients prescribed asthma controllers.

OBJECTIVE

To measure the effectiveness of managed care-led interventions in Medicaid subjects with asthma on medication adherence and acute hospitalization in Pennsylvania.

METHODS

A total of 3589 members (age range, 5-64 years) served by two Pennsylvania-based Medicaid managed care plans (southeastern Pennsylvania [SEPA] and Lehigh-Capital/New West Pennsylvania [LCNWPA]) with low adherence rates (proportion of days covered [PDC]; 20%-67%) for asthma controller prescription fills in 2012 were guided through a care continuum by a comprehensive asthma strategy, consisting of adherence-improvement interventions (grouped as general intervention [GI] or personalized intervention [PI] for higher-risk subjects). Medication adherence and acute hospitalization rates (emergency department [ED] and inpatient [IP]) were compared at baseline versus one-year post-intervention using paired t-test or signed-rank tests. Repeated measures analysis of variances detected the interaction effect of time by intervention group after controlling for sociodemographic covariates.

RESULTS

Member profiles in SEPA (n = 2 796) and LCNWPA (n = 793) were racially and ethnically distinct. Both cohorts experienced statistically significant improvements in mean PDC rate (+4.9% and +7.2%; p = 0.01 and p = 0.03, respectively), accompanied by significant reductions in ED visits (asthma-related: -23.0% and -17.5%, respectively; p < 0.01), and IP admissions (asthma-related: -37.1% and -40.0%, respectively; p < 0.01). The PI subcohorts showed significantly greater improvements in mean PDC versus GI subcohorts (p ≤ 0.04), whereas acute hospitalization rates were statistically comparable in the SEPA cohort, despite its greater asthma burden.

CONCLUSIONS

Managed care-led interventions can effectively improve medication adherence and reduce acute hospitalizations in high-risk Medicaid populations.