The University of Texas at Austin, 2409 University Ave., STOP A1930, Austin, TX 78712-1120.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Dec;21(12):1124-32. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.12.1124.
Adherence to asthma long-term controller medications is one of the key drivers to improve asthma management among patients with persistent asthma. While suboptimal use of controller medications has been found to be associated with more frequent use of oral corticosteroids (OCS), few studies exist regarding the relationship between adherence to controller therapy and the use of short-acting beta2-agonists (SABAs). A better understanding of the association between adherence to asthma controller agents and use of reliever medications will help health care providers and decision makers enhance asthma management.
To determine if there is a relationship between asthma controller adherence, risk of exacerbation requiring OCS, and use of asthma rescue agents.
Texas Medicaid claims data from January 1, 2008, to August 31, 2011, were retrospectively analyzed. Continuously enrolled patients aged 5-63 years with a primary diagnosis of asthma (ICD-9-CM code 493) and with 4 or more prescription claims for any asthma medication in 1 year (persistent asthma) were included. The index date was the date of the first asthma controller prescription, and patients were followed for 1 year. The primary outcome variables were SABA (dichotomous: less than 6 vs. ≥ 6) and OCS (continuous) use. The primary independent variable was adherence (proportion of days covered [PDC]) to asthma long-term controller medications. Covariates included demographics and nonstudy medication utilization. Multivariate logistic and linear regression analyses were employed to address the study objective.
The study sample (n = 32,172) was aged 15.0 ± 14.5 years, and adherence to controller therapy was 32.2% ± 19.7%. The mean number of SABA claims was 3.7 ± 3.1, with most patients having 1-5 claims (73.2%), whereas 19.4% had ≥ 6 SABA claims. The mean number of OCS claims was 1.0 ± 1.4. Adherent (PDC ≥ 50%) patients were 96.7% (OR = 1.967; 95% CI = 1.826-2.120) more likely to have ≥ 6 SABA claims when compared with nonadherent (PDC less than 50%) patients (P less than 0.001). As for OCS use, adherent patients had 0.11 fewer claims compared with nonadherent patients (P less than 0.001). Importantly, patients with ≥ 6 SABA claims had 0.7 more OCS claims compared with patients with less than 6 claims for SABA (P less than 0.001). The odds of having ≥ 6 SABA claims were higher for concurrent dual therapy users, older age, males, African Americans and higher number of nonstudy medications (P less than 0.001). Dual therapy users, younger age, Hispanic ethnicity, and higher number of nonstudy medications were associated with an increase in OCS use (P less than 0.005).
Adherence to long-term controller medications was suboptimal among patients with asthma. Adherent patients had fewer OCS claims, indicating that adherence to controller therapy is critical in preventing asthma exacerbations requiring OCS use. Although there was a positive relationship between adherence to long-term controller medication and SABA use, increased SABA use served as a predictor of increased OCS use, which indicates poor asthma control. Health care providers should be aware of OCS and SABA use among patients who are both adherent and nonadherent to asthma controller medications.
哮喘患者长期使用控制药物是改善其病情管理的关键因素之一。尽管发现控制药物的使用不理想与口服皮质激素(OCS)的使用更频繁有关,但关于控制药物治疗的依从性与短效β2-激动剂(SABA)使用之间的关系的研究很少。更好地了解哮喘控制药物的使用与缓解药物之间的关系将有助于医疗保健提供者和决策者加强哮喘管理。
确定哮喘控制药物的依从性、需要使用 OCS 加重的风险和使用哮喘缓解药物之间是否存在关联。
回顾性分析了 2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2011 年 8 月 31 日的德克萨斯州医疗补助索赔数据。纳入了年龄在 5-63 岁之间、有原发性哮喘(ICD-9-CM 代码 493)诊断、且在 1 年内有 4 次或以上任何哮喘药物处方的连续参保患者。索引日期为首次使用哮喘控制药物的日期,随访期为 1 年。主要结局变量为 SABA(二分类:少于 6 次 vs. 大于等于 6 次)和 OCS(连续)使用。主要独立变量为哮喘长期控制药物的使用依从性(用药天数比例[PDC])。协变量包括人口统计学和非研究药物使用情况。采用多变量逻辑和线性回归分析来解决研究目标。
研究样本(n=32172)年龄为 15.0±14.5 岁,对控制药物治疗的依从性为 32.2%±19.7%。SABA 索赔的平均次数为 3.7±3.1,大多数患者有 1-5 次索赔(73.2%),而 19.4%的患者有≥6 次 SABA 索赔。OCS 索赔的平均次数为 1.0±1.4。与非依从者(PDC<50%)相比,依从者(PDC≥50%)更有可能有≥6 次 SABA 索赔(OR=1.967;95%CI=1.826-2.120)(P<0.001)。至于 OCS 的使用,与非依从者相比,依从者的索赔次数减少了 0.11(P<0.001)。重要的是,与有少于 6 次 SABA 索赔的患者相比,有≥6 次 SABA 索赔的患者有 0.7 次更多的 OCS 索赔(P<0.001)。同时使用双重治疗、年龄较大、男性、非裔美国人和使用更多非研究药物的患者有更高的机会出现≥6 次 SABA 索赔(P<0.001)。同时使用双重治疗、年龄较小、西班牙裔和使用更多非研究药物与 OCS 使用的增加有关(P<0.005)。
哮喘患者对长期控制药物的依从性不理想。依从者的 OCS 索赔较少,表明控制药物治疗对于预防需要使用 OCS 的哮喘加重至关重要。尽管长期控制药物的依从性与 SABA 的使用之间存在正相关关系,但增加 SABA 的使用是增加 OCS 使用的预测因素,这表明哮喘控制不佳。医疗保健提供者应注意依从和不依从哮喘控制药物的患者的 OCS 和 SABA 使用情况。