Department of Endocrinology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Wren Laboratories, Branford, Connecticut, USA.
Neuroendocrinology. 2018;107(1):73-90. doi: 10.1159/000487326. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: A key issue in neuroendocrine neoplasia management is the identification of blood signatures that specifically define the activity of a cancer or local tumor microenvironment. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) may represent such a candidate. To evaluate their clinical utility as biomarkers in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs), we assessed their expression in tissue and blood.
A systematic review of PubMed was undertaken to identify studies investigating miRNAs in GEP-NETs and their utility as blood or tissue biomarkers.
Twenty-two studies using a range of methodologies with different normalization protocols were identified: tumor - gastric NET type 1 (n = 1 study: MiR-222, regulates p27KIP1), pancreatic (n = 6: MiR-21 [inflammatory marker, oncogene] and MiR-144 [PI3K/AKT signaling], both up- and downregulated depending on the method), small intestinal (n = 7: no consistent signature), and colorectal (n = 3: no consistent signature); blood - gastric NET type 1 (n = 1: MiR-222), pancreatic (n = 3: MiR-21), and small intestinal (n = 3: no consistent signature). The studies all included heterogeneous cohorts, were insufficiently powered, and utilized different methodologies, and age- and gender-matched controls were not used. Different miRNA isolation methods and detection protocols resulted in inconsistent expression comparing tumor and blood. A scientific discrepancy was the downregulated expression of some circulating candidates compared to tissue levels, suggesting methodological issues or physiological responses to the tumor. Both are of concern in defining the biometrics of a marker.
A potential biomarker for GEP-NETs included MiR-21 (small bowel and pancreas), but this epithelial tumor marker requires prospective validation. Overall, significant scientific investigation remains to identify and demonstrate neuroendocrine specificity and to validate candidate miRNA biomarkers.
背景/目的:神经内分泌肿瘤管理中的一个关键问题是确定特定定义癌症或局部肿瘤微环境活性的血液特征。microRNAs (miRNAs) 可能就是这样的候选者。为了评估它们作为胃肠胰神经内分泌肿瘤 (GEP-NETs) 的生物标志物的临床效用,我们评估了它们在组织和血液中的表达。
系统地查阅了 PubMed 数据库,以确定研究 miRNAs 在 GEP-NETs 中的作用及其作为血液或组织生物标志物的效用的研究。
共确定了 22 项使用不同标准化方案的各种方法的研究:肿瘤 - 胃 NET 类型 1(n = 1 项研究:MiR-222,调节 p27KIP1),胰腺(n = 6 项:MiR-21 [炎症标志物,癌基因]和 MiR-144 [PI3K/AKT 信号],根据方法的不同而上调或下调),小肠(n = 7 项:没有一致的特征)和结直肠(n = 3 项:没有一致的特征);血液 - 胃 NET 类型 1(n = 1 项:MiR-222),胰腺(n = 3 项:MiR-21)和小肠(n = 3 项:没有一致的特征)。这些研究均纳入了异质队列,统计效能不足,采用了不同的方法,并且未使用年龄和性别匹配的对照。不同的 miRNA 分离方法和检测方案导致肿瘤和血液之间的表达不一致。一个科学争议是一些循环候选物的下调表达与组织水平相比,提示存在方法学问题或对肿瘤的生理反应。这两者都令人关注,因为它们定义了标志物的生物标志物特征。
MiR-21(小肠和胰腺)可能是 GEP-NETs 的潜在生物标志物,但这种上皮肿瘤标志物需要前瞻性验证。总体而言,仍需要进行大量的科学研究来确定和证明神经内分泌特异性,并验证候选 miRNA 生物标志物。