Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, 27708.
School of Human Evolution and Social Change, and Institute of Human Origins, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, 85287.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2018 Jul;166(3):730-744. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.23462. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
While permanent group fissions are documented in humans and other primate species, they are relatively rare in male philopatric primates. One of the few apparent cases occurred in 1973 in Gombe National Park, Tanzania, when a community of chimpanzees split into two separate groups, preceding the famous "Four-Year War." We tested the hypothesis that the original group was a single cohesive community that experienced permanent fission, and investigated several potential catalysts.
We calculated association, grooming, and ranging metrics from historical data and used community detection algorithms and matrix permutation tests to determine the timing, dynamics, and causes of changes in social network subgrouping structure.
We found that the two communities indeed split from one cohesive community, albeit one with incipient subgrouping. The degree of subgrouping in grooming and association networks increased sharply in 1971 and 1972, a period characterized by a dominance struggle between three high-ranking males and unusually high male:female sex ratios. Finally, we found a relationship between post-split community membership and previous association, grooming and ranging patterns in most periods of analysis, one that became more pronounced as the fission approached.
Our analysis suggests that the community began to split during a time of an unusually male-biased sex ratio and a protracted dominance struggle, and that adult males remained with those with whom they had preferentially associated prior to the split. We discuss the costs and benefits of group membership in chimpanzees and contrast these results with group fissions in humans and other taxa.
虽然永久性群体分裂在人类和其他灵长类动物中已有记载,但在雄性恋群的灵长类动物中相对较少见。在坦桑尼亚贡贝国家公园,1973 年发生了一起明显的案例,当时一群黑猩猩分裂成两个独立的群体,这一事件发生在著名的“四年战争”之前。我们检验了这样一个假设,即原始群体是一个经历了永久性分裂的单一凝聚社区,并研究了几个潜在的催化剂。
我们从历史数据中计算了关联、梳理和范围指标,并使用社区检测算法和矩阵置换检验来确定社会网络子组结构变化的时间、动态和原因。
我们发现,这两个群体确实是从一个凝聚的社区中分裂出来的,尽管这个社区已经出现了初步的分组。梳理和关联网络的分组程度在 1971 年和 1972 年急剧增加,这一时期的特点是三位高等级雄性之间的统治斗争和异常高的雄性:雌性性别比例。最后,我们发现,在大多数分析阶段,分裂后社区成员与之前的关联、梳理和活动范围模式之间存在关系,这种关系在分裂临近时变得更加明显。
我们的分析表明,社区开始分裂是在雄性偏倚性别比例异常和持久的统治斗争时期,成年雄性仍然与他们在分裂前优先关联的群体在一起。我们讨论了黑猩猩群体成员资格的成本和收益,并将这些结果与人类和其他分类群的群体分裂进行了对比。