Suppr超能文献

骨盆环骨折后的生活质量:一项横断面研究。

Quality of life after pelvic ring fractures: A cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Brouwers L, Lansink K W W, de Jongh M A C

机构信息

Brabant Trauma Registry, Network Emergency Care Brabant, The Netherlands.

Brabant Trauma Registry, Network Emergency Care Brabant, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Injury. 2018 Apr;49(4):812-818. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Mar 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pelvic ring fractures might have consequences for health-related quality of life (HrQoL). The main purpose of this study was to evaluate patients' HrQoL after a pelvic ring fracture, considering the patients' characteristics. A cross-sectional study was conducted using the EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D) and the Majeed pelvic score (MPS).

METHODS

One hundred ninety-five patients (86%) with pelvic ring fractures who were conservatively or surgically treated in a level 1 trauma centre between 2011 and 2015 were included in this study (mean follow up: 29 months, range 6-61). A telephone survey of all patients was conducted. Multiple logistic and linear regression analyses were used for statistical assessment with the EQ-5D and the MPS. The MPS results were split into two age groups with a cut-off point of 65 years.

RESULTS

EQ-5D: The mean EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Tiles A-C was, respectively, 74 (SD 18), 74 (SD 19) and 67 (SD 21), and the mean EQ-5D index score was, respectively, 0.81 (SD 0.23), 0.77 (SD 0.30) and 0.71 (SD 0.26). Compared with Tile A, patients in Tile C experienced significantly more pain (odds ratio 6.28 (1.73-22.82 95% CI), P < 0.01). Clinically relevant differences in EQ-5D scores between Tile A and Tile C were seen in the domains of usual activities and anxiety and in the index score. MPS: The mean MPS of Tiles A-C patients in the <65 group was, respectively, 86 (SD 15), 81 (SD 17), and 74 (SD 16), and in the ≥65 group, it was, respectively, 69 (SD 15), 68 (SD 15) and 66 (SD 9). In the <65 group, significant differences in MPS results between the Tile groups regarding pain (P < 0.01) and the total MPS score (P = 0.04) were seen. Neither significant regression coefficients nor clinically relevant differences were found in the ≥65 group.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, our study showed that pain was increased in patients with Tile C fractures, compared with Tiles A and B. Furthermore, Tile C patients had significantly lower EQ-5D index and total MPS scores. However, these problems were not seen in the ≥65 group.

摘要

背景

骨盆环骨折可能会对健康相关生活质量(HrQoL)产生影响。本研究的主要目的是考虑患者特征,评估骨盆环骨折患者的HrQoL。使用欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)和马吉德骨盆评分(MPS)进行了一项横断面研究。

方法

本研究纳入了2011年至2015年间在一级创伤中心接受保守或手术治疗的195例骨盆环骨折患者(86%)(平均随访时间:29个月,范围6 - 61个月)。对所有患者进行了电话调查。使用EQ-5D和MPS进行多元逻辑回归和线性回归分析以进行统计评估。MPS结果按65岁的分界点分为两个年龄组。

结果

EQ-5D:Tile A - C组的平均EQ-5D视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分分别为74(标准差18)、74(标准差19)和67(标准差21),平均EQ-5D指数得分分别为0.81(标准差0.23)、0.77(标准差0.30)和0.71(标准差0.26)。与Tile A组相比,Tile C组患者经历的疼痛明显更多(优势比6.28(1.73 - 22.82,95%置信区间),P < 0.01)。在日常活动、焦虑领域以及指数得分方面,Tile A组和Tile C组之间的EQ-5D评分存在临床相关差异。MPS:<65岁组中Tile A - C组患者的平均MPS分别为86(标准差15)、81(标准差17)和74(标准差16),≥65岁组中分别为69(标准差15)、68(标准差15)和66(标准差9)。在<65岁组中,Tile组之间在疼痛方面(P < 0.01)和MPS总分方面(P = 0.04)的MPS结果存在显著差异。在≥65岁组中未发现显著的回归系数或临床相关差异。

结论

总之,我们的研究表明,与Tile A和B组相比,Tile C骨折患者的疼痛增加。此外,Tile C组患者的EQ-5D指数和MPS总分显著较低。然而,在≥65岁组中未出现这些问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验