Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 W 168TH St., PH-11 Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, 325 Ninth Ave, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Dec;34(8):4057-4063. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-04107-1. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
The authors believe that the L5-S1 facet joint injury in the setting of pelvic fractures is underappreciated by orthopedic traumatologists. The purpose of this study was to draw attention to the L5/S1 facet joint in the setting of pelvic ring injuries.
This was a retrospective comparative study of all patients greater than or equal to 18 years of age with an acute pelvic ring injury (AO/OTA 62 B to C) presenting to a single level I trauma center. The primary objective was to determine demographic and injury characteristics associated with L5-S1 facet joint injuries in patients with pelvic ring injuries. The secondary objective was to determine the proportion of L5-S1 facet joint injuries that were missed on initial radiographic workup.
There were 476 patients included in the analysis, 53 (11.1%) of whom had an L5-S1 facet joint injury. Patients with an L5-S1 injury were more likely to be younger (44.1 vs. 53.2 years, p = 0.001) and experience a high energy mechanism of injury (95.0% vs. 78.0%, p = 0.002). Certain injury patterns were associated with L5-S1 facet joint injuries: any sacral fracture (96.2% vs. 73.8%, p < 0.001), Denis zone 2 fractures (43.4% vs. 20.1%, p < 0.001), Denis zone 3 fractures (34.0% vs. 4.7%, p < 0.001), bilateral displaced sacral fractures (18.9% vs. 3.5%, p < 0.001), and L5 transverse process fractures (64.2% vs. 18.0%, p < 0.001). Only 16.0% of radiology reports identified an L5-S1 injury.
Orthopedic traumatologists should scrutinize imaging for L5-S1 facet joint injuries in the presence of pelvic ring injuries, especially in patients with certain sacral fracture patterns.
作者认为,骨科创伤医生对骨盆骨折中 L5-S1 关节突关节损伤重视不足。本研究旨在引起人们对骨盆环损伤中 L5/S1 关节突关节的关注。
这是一项对所有年龄大于或等于 18 岁的急性骨盆环损伤(AO/OTA 62 B 至 C)患者的回顾性对比研究,这些患者均在一家一级创伤中心就诊。主要目的是确定与骨盆环损伤患者的 L5-S1 关节突关节损伤相关的人口统计学和损伤特征。次要目的是确定初始影像学检查中漏诊的 L5-S1 关节突关节损伤比例。
共有 476 例患者纳入分析,其中 53 例(11.1%)存在 L5-S1 关节突关节损伤。发生 L5-S1 损伤的患者更年轻(44.1 岁 vs. 53.2 岁,p=0.001),更易发生高能损伤机制(95.0% vs. 78.0%,p=0.002)。某些损伤模式与 L5-S1 关节突关节损伤相关:任何骶骨骨折(96.2% vs. 73.8%,p<0.001)、Denis 区 2 型骨折(43.4% vs. 20.1%,p<0.001)、Denis 区 3 型骨折(34.0% vs. 4.7%,p<0.001)、双侧移位骶骨骨折(18.9% vs. 3.5%,p<0.001)和 L5 横突骨折(64.2% vs. 18.0%,p<0.001)。只有 16.0%的放射学报告能识别出 L5-S1 损伤。
骨科创伤医生在存在骨盆环损伤的情况下,应仔细检查 L5-S1 关节突关节的影像学表现,特别是对于存在某些骶骨骨折模式的患者。