Suppr超能文献

杠杆征试验对诊断前交叉韧带断裂有附加价值吗?

Does the Lever Sign Test Have Added Value for Diagnosing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Ruptures?

作者信息

Lichtenberg Miranda C, Koster Christiaan H, Teunissen Lennart P J, Oosterveld Frits G J, Harmsen Annelieke M K, Haverkamp Daniel, Hoornenborg Daniel, Berg Robert P, Bloemers Frank W, Faber Irene R

机构信息

Physical Therapy Practice Versgras, Winterswijk, the Netherlands.

Department of Trauma Surgery, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Mar 16;6(3):2325967118759631. doi: 10.1177/2325967118759631. eCollection 2018 Mar.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diagnosing an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture based on a physical examination remains a challenge for both surgeons and physical therapists. The lever sign test was developed to overcome the practical limitations of other tests and to optimize diagnosis. An evaluation of the measurement properties of the lever sign test is needed to make adequate interpretations in practice.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the reliability and diagnostic value of the lever sign test.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

A total of 94 patients were recruited between November 2014 and July 2016. Patients were included if they were at least 16 years old, suffered from knee trauma, and had indications for knee arthroscopic surgery. Lever sign, anterior drawer, Lachman, and pivot-shift test outcomes were examined by an orthopaedic/trauma surgeon and a physical therapist. A test-retest design was used to investigate interrater reliability. Moreover, the lever sign test outcomes, alone and in combination with the other diagnostic tests, were compared with arthroscopic results, which served as the gold standard for the test's diagnostic value.

RESULTS

The lever sign test and pivot-shift test had kappa values exceeding 0.80 for interrater reliability. The kappa values for the anterior drawer test and Lachman test were 0.80 and 0.77, respectively. The lever sign test showed the highest specificity (100%) and the lowest sensitivity (39%) when compared with the other 3 tests. Moreover, its positive and negative predictive values were 100% and 65%, respectively, while an accuracy of 71% was calculated. Clustering the lever sign test parallel with the other 3 tests resulted in the highest accuracy of 91%.

CONCLUSION

The lever sign test appears to have high interrater reliability and is the most specific test, showing a maximal positive predictive value. A positive lever sign test result indicates an ACL rupture. These results support the added value of the lever sign test for diagnosing ACL ruptures.

摘要

背景

基于体格检查诊断前交叉韧带(ACL)断裂,对外科医生和物理治疗师来说仍是一项挑战。杠杆征试验的开发是为了克服其他试验的实际局限性并优化诊断。在实践中进行充分解读需要对杠杆征试验的测量特性进行评估。

目的

评估杠杆征试验的可靠性和诊断价值。

研究设计

队列研究(诊断);证据等级,2级。

方法

2014年11月至2016年7月共招募了94例患者。纳入标准为年龄至少16岁、有膝关节创伤且有膝关节镜手术指征。由一名骨科/创伤外科医生和一名物理治疗师检查杠杆征、前抽屉试验、Lachman试验和轴移试验结果。采用重测设计来研究评估者间的可靠性。此外,将杠杆征试验结果单独以及与其他诊断试验联合,与作为该试验诊断价值金标准的关节镜检查结果进行比较。

结果

杠杆征试验和轴移试验的评估者间可靠性κ值超过0.80。前抽屉试验和Lachman试验的κ值分别为0.80和0.77。与其他3项试验相比,杠杆征试验显示出最高的特异性(100%)和最低的敏感性(39%)。此外,其阳性和阴性预测值分别为100%和65%,计算得出的准确率为71%。将杠杆征试验与其他3项试验并行聚类,准确率最高可达91%。

结论

杠杆征试验似乎具有较高的评估者间可靠性,是最具特异性的试验,显示出最大的阳性预测值。杠杆征试验结果阳性表明存在ACL断裂。这些结果支持了杠杆征试验在诊断ACL断裂方面的附加价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68a5/5858649/1f5a2be0db4f/10.1177_2325967118759631-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验