Department of Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York, 10027, USA.
Department of Ornithology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, 10024, USA.
Ecology. 2018 May;99(5):1099-1107. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2219. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
Ecosystems vary widely in their responses to biodiversity change, with some losing function dramatically while others are highly resilient. However, generalizations about how species- and community-level properties determine these divergent ecosystem responses have been elusive because potential sources of variation (e.g., trophic structure, compensation, functional trait diversity) are rarely evaluated in conjunction. Ecosystem vulnerability, or the likely change in ecosystem function following biodiversity change, is influenced by two types of species traits: response traits that determine species' individual sensitivities to environmental change, and effect traits that determine a species' contribution to ecosystem function. Here we extend the response-effect trait framework to quantify ecosystem vulnerability and show how trophic structure, within-trait variance, and among-trait covariance affect ecosystem vulnerability by linking extinction order and functional compensation. Using in silico trait-based simulations we found that ecosystem vulnerability increased when response and effect traits positively covaried, but this increase was attenuated by decreasing trait variance. Contrary to expectations, in these communities, both functional diversity and trophic structure increased ecosystem vulnerability. In contrast, ecosystem functions were resilient when response and effect traits covaried negatively, and variance had a positive effect on resiliency. Our results suggest that although biodiversity loss is often associated with decreases in ecosystem functions, such effects are conditional on trophic structure, and the variation within and covariation among response and effect traits. Taken together, these three factors can predict when ecosystems are poised to lose or gain function with ongoing biodiversity change.
生态系统对生物多样性变化的响应差异很大,有些系统功能显著丧失,而有些系统则具有很强的恢复力。然而,由于潜在的变异源(如营养结构、补偿、功能性状多样性)很少同时进行评估,因此关于物种和群落水平的特性如何决定这些不同的生态系统响应的概括性结论一直难以捉摸。生态系统脆弱性(即生物多样性变化后生态系统功能可能发生的变化)受到两种类型的物种特性的影响:决定物种对环境变化个体敏感性的响应特性,以及决定物种对生态系统功能贡献的效应特性。在这里,我们扩展了响应-效应特性框架来量化生态系统脆弱性,并通过链接灭绝顺序和功能补偿来展示营养结构、特质内方差和特质间协方差如何影响生态系统脆弱性。通过基于性状的模拟计算,我们发现当响应和效应特性呈正协变时,生态系统脆弱性增加,但这种增加会因性状方差降低而减弱。与预期相反,在这些群落中,功能多样性和营养结构都增加了生态系统脆弱性。相反,当响应和效应特性呈负协变时,生态系统功能具有恢复力,而方差对恢复力有积极的影响。我们的研究结果表明,尽管生物多样性丧失通常与生态系统功能下降有关,但这种效应取决于营养结构,以及响应和效应特性的内变异性和协变异性。总之,这三个因素可以预测随着生物多样性的持续变化,生态系统是准备失去还是获得功能。