Davis Sarah K
University of Worcester, Worcester, UK.
Scand J Psychol. 2018 Jun;59(3):328-339. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12439. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
Emotional intelligence (EI) can buffer potentially harmful effects of situational and chronic stressors to safeguard psychological wellbeing (e.g., Mikolajczak, Petrides, Coumans & Luminet, ), yet understanding how and when EI operates to promote adaptation remains a research priority. We explored whether EI (both trait and ability) modulated early attentional processing of threat-related emotion under conditions of stress. Using a dot probe paradigm, eye movement (fixation to emotive facial stimuli, relative to neutral) and manual reaction time data were collected from 161 adults aged 18-57 years (mean age = 25.24; SD = 8.81) exposed to either a stressful (failure task) or non-stressful (control) situation. Whilst emotion management ability and trait wellbeing corresponded to avoidance of negative emotion (angry and sad respectively), high trait sociability and emotionality related to a bias for negative emotions. With most effects not restricted to stressful conditions, it is unclear whether EI underscores 'adaptive' processing, which carries implications for school-based social and emotional learning programs.
情商(EI)可以缓冲情境性和慢性应激源的潜在有害影响,以维护心理健康(例如,米科拉伊扎克、彼得里德斯、库曼斯和卢米内特),然而,了解情商如何以及何时发挥作用以促进适应仍然是一个研究重点。我们探讨了情商(特质情商和能力情商)是否在压力条件下调节对威胁相关情绪的早期注意力加工。使用点探测范式,从161名年龄在18至57岁之间(平均年龄 = 25.24;标准差 = 8.81)的成年人中收集眼动(相对于中性面部刺激,对情绪化面部刺激的注视)和手动反应时数据,这些成年人处于压力情境(失败任务)或非压力情境(对照)中。虽然情绪管理能力和特质幸福感分别对应于对负面情绪(愤怒和悲伤)的回避,但高特质社交性和情绪性与对负面情绪的偏向有关。由于大多数效应并不局限于压力条件,目前尚不清楚情商是否强调“适应性”加工,这对基于学校的社会和情感学习项目具有启示意义。