Sherwood N
Human Psychopharmacology Research Unit, University of Surrey, Milford Hospital, Godalming, GU7 1Uf, UK.
Hum Psychopharmacol. 1995 Oct;10 Suppl 3(S3):S159-S162. doi: 10.1002/hup.470100904.
The psychopharmacological profiles of several selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) were compared and their behavioural toxicity contrasted both to placebo and the tricyclic antidepressants dothiepin and amitriptyline. On measures of central nervous system arousal (critical flicker fusion), psychomotor speed (choice reaction time), skilled performance (compensatory tracking) and subjective ratings of sedation (line analogue rating scales), the tricyclic compounds clearly impaired performance and led to higher ratings of sedation. While the SSRIs were generally clear of these gross effects, there were quantifiable differences between the compounds, seen mainly as an increase in central nervous system arousal. It remains to be established whether these minor differences have any clinical relevance.
比较了几种选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)的精神药理学特征,并将它们的行为毒性与安慰剂以及三环类抗抑郁药多塞平和阿米替林进行了对比。在中枢神经系统唤醒(临界闪烁融合)、精神运动速度(选择反应时间)、技能操作(补偿跟踪)以及镇静主观评分(视觉类似物评分量表)等指标上,三环类化合物明显损害了操作表现,并导致更高的镇静评分。虽然SSRI总体上没有这些明显影响,但不同化合物之间存在可量化的差异,主要表现为中枢神经系统唤醒增加。这些微小差异是否具有临床相关性仍有待确定。