• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价一种用胶原蛋白膜覆盖的骨替代物在拔牙后用于牙槽嵴保存的效果。一项针对人类的临床和断层随机对照研究。

Evaluation of a bone substitute covered with a collagen membrane for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. Clinical and tomographic randomized controlled study in humans.

机构信息

Departament of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery and Periodontology, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.

Oral Radiology, Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Apr;29(4):424-433. doi: 10.1111/clr.13140. Epub 2018 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1111/clr.13140
PMID:29569754
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of a synthetic bone substitute covered with a collagen membrane for ridge preservation after tooth extraction, by clinical and tomographic analysis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifteen patients, presenting at least two maxillary anterior teeth indicated for extraction, were selected: in the test group (TG), post-extraction sockets were filled by a synthetic bone substitute; in the control group (CG), by blood clot. In both groups, the sockets were covered by a collagen membrane. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) scans were acquired immediately after and 6 months post-surgically, and horizontal and vertical dimensional bone changes were quantified.

RESULTS

Transurgical clinical analysis presented no statistically significant differences between TG and CG (p > .05). CBCT intragroup evaluation presented statistically significant reduction for the buccal alveolar measurement (TG = 1.58 mm or 21.82%, and CG = 1.66 mm or 24.08%) and horizontal cervical measurement (TG = 0.55 mm or 8.30% and CG = 1.30 mm or 17.68%), and not significant for palatal alveolar measurement (TG = 0.44 mm or 3.42% and CG = 0.26 mm or 3.89%). For alveolar height and horizontal apical measurements, this decrease was significant only for the CG, with reductions of 1.03 mm and 0.50 mm, respectively, compared to a decrease of 0.57 mm and 0.19 mm for the TG. The intergroup analysis showed significant difference for cervical horizontal measurement after 6 months (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

The results showed that the use of the bone substitute covered with a collagen membrane resulted in less changes in vertical and horizontal alveolar ridge dimensions than the collagen membrane alone.

摘要

目的

通过临床和断层分析评估使用覆盖胶原膜的合成骨替代物进行拔牙后牙槽嵴保存的效果。

材料和方法

选择了 15 名至少有两颗上颌前牙需要拔除的患者:在实验组(TG)中,拔牙窝内填充合成骨替代物;在对照组(CG)中,拔牙窝内填充血凝块。两组均用胶原膜覆盖。术后即刻和 6 个月时采集锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT),定量测量水平和垂直骨量变化。

结果

术中临床分析显示 TG 和 CG 之间无统计学差异(p>.05)。CBCT 组内评估显示颊侧牙槽测量(TG=1.58mm 或 21.82%,CG=1.66mm 或 24.08%)和水平颈部测量(TG=0.55mm 或 8.30%,CG=1.30mm 或 17.68%)有统计学显著减少,但腭侧牙槽测量(TG=0.44mm 或 3.42%,CG=0.26mm 或 3.89%)无显著减少。对于牙槽骨高度和水平根尖测量,仅 CG 出现显著减少,分别减少 1.03mm 和 0.50mm,而 TG 减少 0.57mm 和 0.19mm。组间分析显示 6 个月时颈部水平测量有显著差异(p<.05)。

结论

结果表明,与单独使用胶原膜相比,使用覆盖胶原膜的骨替代物可使牙槽嵴垂直和水平维度的变化更小。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a bone substitute covered with a collagen membrane for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. Clinical and tomographic randomized controlled study in humans.评价一种用胶原蛋白膜覆盖的骨替代物在拔牙后用于牙槽嵴保存的效果。一项针对人类的临床和断层随机对照研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Apr;29(4):424-433. doi: 10.1111/clr.13140. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
2
Combined use of xenogeneic bone substitute material covered with a native bilayer collagen membrane for alveolar ridge preservation: A randomized controlled clinical trial.采用同种异体骨替代材料覆盖天然双层胶原膜行牙槽嵴保存的随机对照临床试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 May;29(5):522-529. doi: 10.1111/clr.13149. Epub 2018 Apr 1.
3
Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of regenerated buccal bone 5 years after simultaneous implant placement and guided bone regeneration procedures--a randomized, controlled clinical trial.同期种植体植入与引导骨再生术后5年再生颊骨的锥形束计算机断层扫描评估——一项随机对照临床试验
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(1):28-34. doi: 10.1111/clr.12296. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
4
Randomized clinical trial of ridge preservation using porcine bone/cross-linked collagen vs. bovine bone/non-cross-linked collagen: cone beam computed tomographic analysis.随机对照临床试验研究使用猪骨/交联胶原和牛骨/非交联胶原进行牙槽嵴保存的效果:锥形束 CT 分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Dec;28(12):1492-1500. doi: 10.1111/clr.13017. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
5
Ridge preservation with acellular dermal matrix and anorganic bone matrix cell-binding peptide P-15 after tooth extraction in humans.人拔牙后用脱细胞真皮基质和无机骨基质细胞结合肽 P-15 进行牙槽嵴保存。
J Periodontol. 2011 Jan;82(1):72-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100241. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
6
Clinical evaluation of a ridge augmentation procedure for the severely resorbed alveolar socket: multicenter randomized controlled trial, preliminary results.一种严重吸收牙槽窝的牙槽嵴增高术的临床评估:多中心随机对照试验,初步结果。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 May;23(5):526-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02386.x. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
7
Three-Dimensional Volumetric Changes in Severely Resorbed Alveolar Sockets After Ridge Augmentation with Bovine-Derived Xenograft and Resorbable Barrier: A Preliminary Study on CBCT Imaging.使用牛源异种移植物和可吸收屏障进行牙槽嵴增高后严重吸收的牙槽窝的三维容积变化:CBCT成像的初步研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 March/April;33(2):373–382. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5684. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
8
Buccal bone formation after flapless extraction: a randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2/absorbable collagen carrier and collagen sponge alone.无瓣拔牙后颊骨形成:一项比较重组人骨形态发生蛋白2/可吸收胶原载体与单独胶原海绵的随机对照临床试验。
J Periodontol. 2014 Apr;85(4):525-35. doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.130207. Epub 2013 Jul 4.
9
Alveolar ridge preservation with guided bone regeneration and a synthetic bone substitute or a bovine-derived xenograft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.引导骨再生联合合成骨替代材料或牛来源异种骨用于牙槽嵴保存的随机对照临床试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Jul;21(7):688-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01918.x.
10
Comparison between two bone substitutes for alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: Cone-beam computed tomography results of a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.两种牙槽嵴保存骨替代材料的比较:一项非劣效性随机对照临床试验的锥形束 CT 结果。
J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Mar;46(3):373-381. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13079. Epub 2019 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Find Out the Efficacy of Socket Preservation Techniques in Adults in Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Trials.一项系统评价和荟萃分析,旨在找出成人中采用分口随机对照试验的牙槽窝保存技术的疗效。
Cureus. 2025 Mar 1;17(3):e79873. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79873. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Advancements in alveolar bone grafting and ridge preservation: a narrative review on materials, techniques, and clinical outcomes.牙槽骨移植与牙槽嵴保存的进展:关于材料、技术和临床结果的叙述性综述
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Apr 16;46(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40902-024-00425-w.
3
Efficacy of Alveolar Ridge Preservation in Periodontally Compromised Molar Extraction Sites: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
牙周受损磨牙拔牙位点牙槽嵴保存的疗效:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 20;13(5):1198. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051198.
4
Dimensional and histomorphometric evaluation of biomaterials used for alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.用于牙槽嵴保存的生物材料的尺寸和组织形态计量学评估:一项系统综述和网状荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jan;26(1):141-158. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04248-1. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
5
Extraction socket preservation.拔牙窝保存
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Dec 31;46(6):435-439. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2020.46.6.435.