• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

引导骨再生联合合成骨替代材料或牛来源异种骨用于牙槽嵴保存的随机对照临床试验。

Alveolar ridge preservation with guided bone regeneration and a synthetic bone substitute or a bovine-derived xenograft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

机构信息

Periodontology Unit, UCL - Eastman Dental Institute, London, UK.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Jul;21(7):688-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01918.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01918.x
PMID:20636724
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this randomized, controlled clinical trial was to compare the potential of a synthetic bone substitute or a bovine-derived xenograft combined with a collagen membrane to preserve the alveolar ridge dimensions following tooth extraction.

METHODS

Twenty-seven patients were randomized into two treatment groups following single tooth extraction in the incisor, canine and premolar area. In the test group, the alveolar socket was grafted with Straumann Bone Ceramic (SBC), while in the control group, Bio-Oss deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) was applied. In both groups, a collagen barrier was used to cover the grafting material. Complete soft tissue coverage of the barriers was not achieved. After 8 months, during re-entry procedures and before implant placement, the horizontal and vertical dimensions of the residual ridge were re-evaluated and trephine biopsies were performed for histological analysis in all patients.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients completed the study. The bucco-lingual dimension of the alveolar ridge decreased by 1.1+/-1 mm in the SBC group and by 2.1+/-1 in the DBBM group (P<0.05). Both materials preserved the mesio-distal bone height of the ridge. No differences in the width of buccal and palatal bone plate were observed between the two groups. The histological analysis showed new bone formation in the apical part of the biopsies, which, in some instances, was in direct contact with both SBC and DBBM particles. The coronal part of the biopsies was occupied by a dense fibrous connective tissue surrounding the SBC and DBBM particles.

CONCLUSION

Both biomaterials partially preserved the width and the interproximal bone height of the alveolar ridge.

摘要

目的

本随机对照临床试验的目的是比较合成骨替代物或牛衍生异种移植物与胶原膜结合在拔牙后保持牙槽嵴尺寸的潜力。

方法

在切牙、犬齿和前磨牙区进行单颗牙齿拔除后,27 名患者被随机分为两组。在实验组中,牙槽窝用 Straumann Bone Ceramic(SBC)移植,而在对照组中,应用 Bio-Oss 脱蛋白牛骨矿物质(DBBM)。两组均使用胶原屏障覆盖移植物。屏障未完全覆盖软组织。8 个月后,在再次进入程序和植入物放置前,对所有患者进行了剩余牙槽嵴的水平和垂直尺寸的重新评估,并进行了环钻活检进行组织学分析。

结果

26 名患者完成了研究。SBC 组牙槽嵴的颊舌向尺寸减少了 1.1+/-1mm,DBBM 组减少了 2.1+/-1(P<0.05)。两种材料均保持了嵴的近远中骨高度。两组间颊侧和腭侧骨板的宽度无差异。组织学分析显示在活检的根尖部分有新骨形成,在某些情况下,与 SBC 和 DBBM 颗粒直接接触。活检的冠部部分被致密的纤维结缔组织占据,围绕着 SBC 和 DBBM 颗粒。

结论

两种生物材料部分保留了牙槽嵴的宽度和近远中骨高度。

相似文献

1
Alveolar ridge preservation with guided bone regeneration and a synthetic bone substitute or a bovine-derived xenograft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.引导骨再生联合合成骨替代材料或牛来源异种骨用于牙槽嵴保存的随机对照临床试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Jul;21(7):688-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01918.x.
2
A prospective randomized clinical study of changes in soft tissue position following immediate and delayed implant placement.即刻与延期种植即刻植入对软组织位置变化的前瞻性随机临床研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 May-Jun;25(3):562-70.
3
Hard tissue alterations after socket preservation: an experimental study in the beagle dog.拔牙窝保存后的硬组织改变:在比格犬身上的实验研究
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Nov;19(11):1111-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01575.x.
4
Maxillary sinus grafting with Bio-Oss or Straumann Bone Ceramic: histomorphometric results from a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial.使用Bio-Oss或Straumann骨陶瓷进行上颌窦植骨:一项随机对照多中心临床试验的组织形态计量学结果
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Aug;19(8):796-803. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01565.x.
5
Histologic comparison of healing following tooth extraction with ridge preservation using two different xenograft protocols.两种不同异种移植物骨代用品骨增量方案拔牙后愈合的组织学比较。
J Periodontol. 2013 May;84(5):585-94. doi: 10.1902/jop.2012.120219. Epub 2012 Jun 9.
6
Radiographic alveolar bone changes following ridge preservation with two different biomaterials.两种不同生物材料保存牙槽嵴后放射学牙槽骨变化。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Apr;22(4):416-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02154.x.
7
Clinical, histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of socket preservation using a synthetic nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite in comparison with a bovine xenograft: a randomized clinical trial.采用合成纳米羟基磷灰石与牛异种骨对比保存拔牙窝的临床、组织学和组织形态计量学评估:一项随机临床试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23(10):1198-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02288.x. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
8
A randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate a new membrane for guided bone regeneration around dental implants.一项评估用于牙种植体周围引导骨再生的新型膜的随机对照临床试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Feb;20(2):162-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01634.x.
9
Dimensional ridge alterations following immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a six-month prospective cohort study with surgical re-entry.磨牙拔牙位点即刻种植后牙槽嵴维度改变:一项为期六个月的带有手术再入路的前瞻性队列研究
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Oct;20(10):1092-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01803.x. Epub 2009 Aug 30.
10
Xenograft versus extraction alone for ridge preservation after tooth removal: a clinical and histomorphometric study.异种移植与单纯拔牙后牙槽嵴保存:一项临床和组织形态计量学研究。
J Periodontol. 2008 Aug;79(8):1370-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070628.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and Histologic Outcomes of Biologically Oriented Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Prospective Observational Study.生物导向性牙槽嵴保存的临床和组织学结果:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Jun;27(3):e70048. doi: 10.1111/cid.70048.
2
Lateral Alveolar Ridge Augmentation with Autogenous Tooth Roots and Staged Implant Placement-5-Year Follow-Up Case Series.使用自体牙根进行牙槽嵴外侧增高术及分期种植体植入——5年随访病例系列
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 29;13(17):5118. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175118.
3
Guided bone regeneration at dehiscence comparing synthetic bone substitute versus bovine bone mineral: A multicenter, noninferiority, randomized trial.
在骨开裂处进行引导骨再生时合成骨替代物与牛骨矿物质的比较:一项多中心、非劣效性随机试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2024 Dec;26(6):1233-1244. doi: 10.1111/cid.13386. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
4
Clinical evaluation of implants placed within or beyond the boundaries of the alveolar ridge preservation: a retrospective case series with 10 weeks of observations in 28 patients.牙槽嵴保存边界内或边界外植入种植体的临床评估:一项对28例患者进行10周观察的回顾性病例系列研究。
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2025 Feb;55(1):50-61. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2400800040. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
5
Alveolar Ridge Preservation With Fibro-Gide or Connective Tissue Graft: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Soft and Hard Tissue Changes.引导骨组织再生术联合或不联合纤维蛋白胶在牙槽嵴保存中的随机对照研究:软组织和硬组织变化的临床研究。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024 Aug;10(4):e929. doi: 10.1002/cre2.929.
6
Changes of the Alveolar Bone Ridge Using Bone Mineral Grafts and Collagen Membranes after Tooth Extraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.拔牙后使用骨矿物质移植材料和胶原膜对牙槽嵴的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Jun 3;11(6):565. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11060565.
7
Biphasic Calcium Phosphate in the Extraction Socket Preservation: A Systematic Review.拔牙窝保存中双相磷酸钙的系统评价
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Apr;16(Suppl 2):S1007-S1011. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1003_23. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
8
Advancements in alveolar bone grafting and ridge preservation: a narrative review on materials, techniques, and clinical outcomes.牙槽骨移植与牙槽嵴保存的进展:关于材料、技术和临床结果的叙述性综述
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Apr 16;46(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40902-024-00425-w.
9
Photobiomodulation Therapy Improves Repair of Bone Defects Filled by Inorganic Bone Matrix and Fibrin Heterologous Biopolymer.光生物调节疗法可改善由无机骨基质和纤维蛋白异源生物聚合物填充的骨缺损的修复。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Jan 13;11(1):78. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11010078.
10
Research Hotspots and Trends of Bone Xenograft in Clinical Procedures: A Bibliometric and Visual Analysis of the Past Decade.临床手术中骨异种移植的研究热点与趋势:过去十年的文献计量学与可视化分析
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Aug 4;10(8):929. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10080929.