Peacock Amy, Larance Briony, Farrell Michael, Cairns Rose, Buckley Nicholas, Degenhardt Louisa
National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 23;8(3):e020006. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020006.
It has been argued that tapentadol may pharmacologically have lower abuse potential than other pharmaceutical opioids currently available. However, there has been no comprehensive triangulation of data regarding use and harms associated with this formulation. A sustained-release formulation (SRF) of tapentadol (Palexia) was released in Australia in 2011 and listed for public subsidy in 2013. We summarise here the methods of a postmarketing study which will measure postintroduction: (1) population level availability, (2) extramedical use and diversion, (3) attractiveness for extramedical use and (4) associated harms, of tapentadol compared against other pharmaceutical opioids.
We evaluated key sources on pharmaceutical use and harms in Australia. This review indicateddata from four sources that disaggregate pharmaceutical opioid formulations and capture tapentadol SRF could be triangulated. These data sources comprised: (1) national pharmaceutical opioid community sales data from 2011 to 2017, (2) national pharmaceutical opioid poisonings reported to Poison Information Centres (PICs) from 2011 to 2017, (3) number of vendors on online marketplaces listing pharmaceutical opioids for sale and (4) data on pharmaceutical opioid extramedical use, attractiveness and harms from interviews with people who regularly inject drugs in Australia.
Ethics approval is not required for use of pharmaceutical sales data. Ethics approval has been obtained for use of national pharmaceutical opioid poisonings reported to PICs (LNR/16/SCHN/44) and for use of online marketplace data and interview data from people who inject drugs (HC12086). Key findings will be published mid-2018 in a peer-reviewed academic journal, and presented at various conferences and professional meetings.
有人认为,与目前市面上的其他药用阿片类药物相比,曲马多在药理学上的滥用可能性较低。然而,关于这种制剂的使用和危害,目前尚无全面的数据三角验证。曲马多缓释制剂(Palexia)于2011年在澳大利亚上市,并于2013年列入公共补贴名单。我们在此总结一项上市后研究的方法,该研究将衡量曲马多上市后的情况:(1)人群层面的可获得性,(2)非医疗用途和药物转移,()非医疗用途的吸引力,以及(4)与其他药用阿片类药物相比,曲马多的相关危害。
我们评估了澳大利亚药物使用和危害的关键数据来源。该综述表明,可以对来自四个数据源的数据进行三角验证,这些数据源可细分药用阿片类药物制剂并获取曲马多缓释制剂的数据。这些数据源包括:(1)2011年至2017年全国药用阿片类药物社区销售数据,(2)2011年至2017年向毒物信息中心(PICs)报告的全国药用阿片类药物中毒情况,(3)在线市场上列出待售药用阿片类药物的供应商数量,以及(4)对澳大利亚定期注射毒品者进行访谈获得的关于药用阿片类药物非医疗用途、吸引力和危害的数据。
使用药品销售数据无需伦理批准。已获得使用向PICs报告的全国药用阿片类药物中毒情况(LNR/16/SCHN/44)以及使用在线市场数据和来自注射毒品者的访谈数据的伦理批准(HC12086)。主要研究结果将于2018年年中发表在同行评审的学术期刊上,并在各种会议和专业会议上展示。