Suppr超能文献

比较曲马多和羟考酮滥用或依赖风险:一项队列研究的结果。

Comparison of the risks of opioid abuse or dependence between tapentadol and oxycodone: results from a cohort study.

机构信息

Janssen Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, New Jersey.

出版信息

J Pain. 2013 Oct;14(10):1227-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.05.010. Epub 2013 Jul 10.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Tapentadol may have a lower abuse risk than other opioids because it has a relatively low affinity for the mu-opioid receptor. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to compare the risk of opioid abuse between tapentadol immediate release (IR) and oxycodone IR using 2 claims databases (Optum and MarketScan). Subjects with no recent opioid use exposed to tapentadol IR or oxycodone IR in 2010 were followed for 1 year. The outcome was the proportion of subjects who developed opioid abuse, defined as subjects with International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, codes for opioid abuse, addiction, or dependence. The relative odds of abuse were estimated using a logistic regression model with propensity-score stratification. The estimates from the 2 databases were pooled using a random effects model. There were 13,814 subjects in Optum (11,378 exposed to oxycodone, 2,436 exposed to tapentadol) and 25,553 in MarketScan (21,728 exposed to oxycodone, 3,825 exposed to tapentadol). The risk of abuse was higher in the oxycodone group than in the tapentadol group in each database. The pooled adjusted estimate for the odds of abuse was 65% lower with tapentadol than with oxycodone (odds ratio = .35, 95% confidence interval = .21-.58). The risk of receiving an abuse diagnosis with tapentadol was lower than the risk with oxycodone. Continued monitoring is warranted because opioid desirability can change over time.

PERSPECTIVE

This study compared the risk of receiving an opioid abuse diagnosis between tapentadol and oxycodone in 2 U.S. claims databases. The risk of receiving an abuse diagnosis was lower with tapentadol during the year of follow-up. Opioid prescribers and patients must be aware of the risk of abuse associated with all opioids.

摘要

未加标注的内容

曲马多与其他阿片类药物相比,滥用风险可能较低,因为它与μ-阿片受体的亲和力相对较低。本回顾性队列研究的目的是使用两个索赔数据库(Optum 和 MarketScan)比较曲马多即释(IR)和羟考酮 IR 之间的阿片类药物滥用风险。2010 年无近期阿片类药物使用史且暴露于曲马多 IR 或羟考酮 IR 的受试者,随访 1 年。结局是发生阿片类药物滥用的受试者比例,定义为有阿片类药物滥用、成瘾或依赖的国际疾病分类第 9 版代码的受试者。使用具有倾向评分分层的逻辑回归模型估计滥用的相对比值。使用随机效应模型对来自两个数据库的估计值进行汇总。Optum 中有 13814 名受试者(11378 名暴露于羟考酮,2436 名暴露于曲马多),MarketScan 中有 25553 名受试者(21728 名暴露于羟考酮,3825 名暴露于曲马多)。在每个数据库中,羟考酮组的滥用风险均高于曲马多组。与羟考酮相比,曲马多的滥用比值比(OR)为 0.35(95%置信区间[CI]:0.21~0.58),调整后的估计值表明滥用的几率降低了 65%。曲马多的滥用风险低于羟考酮。需要持续监测,因为阿片类药物的可接受性可能随时间而变化。

观点

本研究在两个美国索赔数据库中比较了曲马多和羟考酮之间接受阿片类药物滥用诊断的风险。在随访的 1 年内,曲马多的滥用诊断风险较低。阿片类药物开处方者和患者必须意识到所有阿片类药物都存在滥用风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验