• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项在日本2型糖尿病患者中比较司美格鲁肽每周一次与其他GLP-1受体激动剂的网状Meta分析。

A Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Semaglutide Once-Weekly with Other GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

作者信息

Webb Neil, Orme Michelle, Witkowski Michal, Nakanishi Rie, Langer Jakob

机构信息

DRG Abacus, Bicester, Oxfordshire, UK.

ICERA Consulting Ltd., Swindon, UK.

出版信息

Diabetes Ther. 2018 Jun;9(3):973-986. doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0397-1. Epub 2018 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1007/s13300-018-0397-1
PMID:29574633
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5984907/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Semaglutide once-weekly (QW) is a novel glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue administered at a 0.5 or 1.0 mg dose. In the absence of head-to-head trials between semaglutide QW and other GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in a Japanese population, a network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed. The objective was to assess the relative efficacy and safety of semaglutide QW vs GLP-1 RAs in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), with a specific focus on the comparison between semaglutide 0.5 mg QW and dulaglutide 0.75 mg QW.

METHODS

A systematic review (SR) and supplementary Japanese searches were conducted to identify trials of GLP-1 RAs in Japanese patients on diet and exercise, who have previously received 0-1 oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs). Data at 52-56 weeks were extracted for the following outcomes (feasible for analysis in an NMA): glycated hemoglobin (HbA), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), weight, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and overall hypoglycemia. The data were synthesized using an NMA and a Bayesian framework.

RESULTS

Four trials, identified from the SR and Japanese-specific searches, were relevant for inclusion in the NMA. When compared to dulaglutide 0.75 mg QW, semaglutide 0.5 mg QW was shown to provide significant reductions in HbA [- 0.61% (12.3 mmol/mol)], weight (- 1.45 kg), SBP (- 5.03 mmHg), and FPG (- 1.26 mmol/L). No significant differences in the proportion of patients achieving a HbA level < 7% (53 mmol/mol) or the risk of overall hypoglycemia were observed between semaglutide 0.5 mg QW and dulaglutide 0.75 mg QW.

CONCLUSION

Overall, semaglutide 0.5 mg QW was associated with significant reductions from baseline in HbA, weight, SBP, and FPG compared with dulaglutide 0.75 mg QW in Japanese patients with T2DM. These data may provide valuable evidence for clinical decision-making, cost-effectiveness analyses, and health technology appraisal (HTA) requirements.

FUNDING

Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd.

摘要

引言

司美格鲁肽每周一次(QW)是一种新型胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)类似物,给药剂量为0.5或1.0毫克。在日本人群中,司美格鲁肽QW与其他GLP-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)之间缺乏头对头试验的情况下,进行了一项网状Meta分析(NMA)。目的是评估司美格鲁肽QW与GLP-1 RAs在日本2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中的相对疗效和安全性,特别关注司美格鲁肽0.5毫克QW与度拉糖肽0.75毫克QW之间的比较。

方法

进行了一项系统评价(SR)和补充的日语检索,以确定在饮食和运动基础上、之前接受过0-1种口服抗糖尿病药物(OADs)的日本患者中GLP-1 RAs的试验。提取了52-56周时以下结局的数据(可用于NMA分析):糖化血红蛋白(HbA)、空腹血糖(FPG)、体重、收缩压(SBP)和总体低血糖情况。使用NMA和贝叶斯框架对数据进行综合分析。

结果

从SR和日语特定检索中确定的四项试验与纳入NMA相关。与度拉糖肽0.75毫克QW相比,司美格鲁肽0.5毫克QW显示出糖化血红蛋白显著降低[-0.61%(12.3 mmol/mol)]、体重降低(-1.45千克)、收缩压降低(-5.03 mmHg)和空腹血糖降低(-1.26 mmol/L)。在司美格鲁肽0.5毫克QW和度拉糖肽0.75毫克QW之间,未观察到糖化血红蛋白水平<7%(53 mmol/mol)的患者比例或总体低血糖风险有显著差异。

结论

总体而言,在日本T2DM患者中,与度拉糖肽0.75毫克QW相比,司美格鲁肽0.5毫克QW与糖化血红蛋白、体重、收缩压和空腹血糖较基线水平显著降低相关。这些数据可为临床决策、成本效益分析和卫生技术评估(HTA)要求提供有价值的证据。

资助

诺和诺德制药有限公司

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80e0/5984907/0a822300fce9/13300_2018_397_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80e0/5984907/402f8fdebb59/13300_2018_397_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80e0/5984907/22b69cd854ba/13300_2018_397_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80e0/5984907/0a822300fce9/13300_2018_397_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80e0/5984907/402f8fdebb59/13300_2018_397_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80e0/5984907/22b69cd854ba/13300_2018_397_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80e0/5984907/0a822300fce9/13300_2018_397_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Semaglutide Once-Weekly with Other GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.一项在日本2型糖尿病患者中比较司美格鲁肽每周一次与其他GLP-1受体激动剂的网状Meta分析。
Diabetes Ther. 2018 Jun;9(3):973-986. doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0397-1. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
2
Orally Administered Semaglutide Versus GLP-1 RAs in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Previously Receiving 1-2 Oral Antidiabetics: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.口服司美格鲁肽与胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂用于既往接受1-2种口服抗糖尿病药物治疗的2型糖尿病患者:系统评价与网状Meta分析
Diabetes Ther. 2019 Dec;10(6):2183-2199. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-00706-y. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
3
A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Once-Weekly Semaglutide with Other GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Previously Receiving 1-2 Oral Anti-Diabetic Drugs.一项系统文献综述和网状荟萃分析:比较在既往接受1-2种口服抗糖尿病药物治疗的2型糖尿病患者中,每周一次的司美格鲁肽与其他胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂的疗效。
Diabetes Ther. 2018 Jun;9(3):1149-1167. doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0424-2. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
4
A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Once-Weekly Semaglutide with Other GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Previously Receiving Basal Insulin.一项系统文献综述和网状荟萃分析:比较既往接受基础胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者中,每周一次司美格鲁肽与其他胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂的疗效
Diabetes Ther. 2018 Jun;9(3):1233-1251. doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0428-y. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
5
Once-Daily Oral Semaglutide Versus Injectable GLP-1 RAs in People with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Basal Insulin: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.在基础胰岛素治疗血糖控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者中,每日一次口服司美格鲁肽与注射用胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂的比较:系统评价和网状荟萃分析
Diabetes Ther. 2021 May;12(5):1325-1339. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01034-w. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
6
Glycaemic and non-glycaemic efficacy of once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonists in people with type 2 diabetes.每周一次的胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂对2型糖尿病患者的血糖及非血糖疗效
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2020 Sep;45 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):28-42. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13224.
7
Management of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes with Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide, Exenatide ER, Liraglutide and Lixisenatide: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in the Danish Setting.在丹麦环境下,每周一次司美格鲁肽与度拉鲁肽、艾塞那肽缓释剂、利拉鲁肽和利司那肽治疗2型糖尿病患者的成本效益分析
Diabetes Ther. 2019 Aug;10(4):1297-1317. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-0630-6. Epub 2019 May 16.
8
Weekly Semaglutide vs. Liraglutide Efficacy Profile: A Network Meta-Analysis.司美格鲁肽与利拉鲁肽疗效对比:网状Meta分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Aug 30;9(9):1125. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9091125.
9
A Network Meta-analysis Comparing Exenatide Once Weekly with Other GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.一项比较艾塞那肽每周一次与其他胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂治疗2型糖尿病的网状Meta分析。
Diabetes Ther. 2016 Mar;7(1):27-43. doi: 10.1007/s13300-016-0155-1. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
10
The Management of Type 2 Diabetes with Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide: A Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Slovakia.在斯洛伐克,每周一次司美格鲁肽与每周一次度拉鲁肽治疗 2 型糖尿病的管理:一项长期成本效益分析。
Adv Ther. 2019 Aug;36(8):2034-2051. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-00965-y. Epub 2019 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Once-Weekly Semaglutide on Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study Based on Real-World Data.每周一次司美格鲁肽对日本2型糖尿病患者心血管危险因素及代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝病的影响:一项基于真实世界数据的回顾性纵向研究
Biomedicines. 2024 May 2;12(5):1001. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12051001.
2
Glycemic Control, Weight Management, Cardiovascular Safety, and Cost-Effectiveness of Semaglutide for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Rapid Review and Meta-analysis of Real-World Studies.司美格鲁肽用于2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制、体重管理、心血管安全性及成本效益:真实世界研究的快速回顾与荟萃分析
Diabetes Ther. 2024 Feb;15(2):497-519. doi: 10.1007/s13300-023-01520-3. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Semaglutide versus dulaglutide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 7): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial.司美格鲁肽对比度拉鲁肽每周 1 次治疗 2 型糖尿病患者(SUSTAIN 7):一项随机、开放标签、3b 期临床试验。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Apr;6(4):275-286. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30024-X. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
2
Safety and efficacy of once-weekly semaglutide vs additional oral antidiabetic drugs in Japanese people with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes: A randomized trial.每周一次司美格鲁肽对比其他口服降糖药用于治疗日本 2 型糖尿病血糖控制不佳患者的安全性和有效性:一项随机试验。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 May;20(5):1202-1212. doi: 10.1111/dom.13218. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
3
Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide compared with the first-line hypoglycemic drugs in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较度拉糖肽与一线降糖药物在亚洲 2 型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 31;12(1):18281. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22263-4.
4
Weekly Semaglutide vs. Liraglutide Efficacy Profile: A Network Meta-Analysis.司美格鲁肽与利拉鲁肽疗效对比:网状Meta分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Aug 30;9(9):1125. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9091125.
5
Response to "Letter to the Editor Regarding: Patient Preferences for Glucagon-like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonist Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Japan: A Discrete Choice Experiment".对《致编辑的信:关于日本2型糖尿病患者对胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂治疗的偏好:一项离散选择实验》的回复
Diabetes Ther. 2020 Oct;11(10):2443-2446. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00900-3. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
Safety and efficacy of semaglutide once weekly vs sitagliptin once daily, both as monotherapy in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes.
每周一次司美格鲁肽对比每日一次西格列汀单药治疗在日本 2 型糖尿病患者中的安全性和疗效。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Feb;20(2):378-388. doi: 10.1111/dom.13082. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
4
Evaluation of the impact of once weekly dulaglutide on patient-reported outcomes in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: comparisons with liraglutide, insulin glargine, and placebo in two randomized studies.评估每周一次度拉糖肽对日本2型糖尿病患者自我报告结局的影响:在两项随机研究中与利拉鲁肽、甘精胰岛素及安慰剂的比较
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Jun 12;15(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0696-7.
5
IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040.国际糖尿病联盟糖尿病地图:2015年和2040年全球糖尿病患病率估计
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Jun;128:40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.03.024. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
6
Placebo-controlled, randomized trial of the addition of once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist dulaglutide to titrated daily insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD-9).安慰剂对照、随机试验,观察每周一次胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂度拉鲁肽添加至滴定剂量每日胰岛素甘精的疗效,该研究纳入了 2 型糖尿病患者(AWARD-9)。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Jul;19(7):1024-1031. doi: 10.1111/dom.12937. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
7
Sources of inaccuracy in the measurement of adult patients' resting blood pressure in clinical settings: a systematic review.临床环境中成年患者静息血压测量不准确的来源:一项系统综述
J Hypertens. 2017 Mar;35(3):421-441. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001197.
8
New glycemic targets for patients with diabetes from the Japan Diabetes Society.日本糖尿病学会提出的糖尿病患者新血糖目标。
J Diabetes Investig. 2017 Jan;8(1):123-125. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12600. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
9
Large-scale survey of rates of achieving targets for blood glucose, blood pressure, and lipids and prevalence of complications in type 2 diabetes (JDDM 40).2型糖尿病患者血糖、血压和血脂达标率及并发症患病率的大规模调查(日本糖尿病学会杂志40)
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2016 Oct 3;4(1):e000294. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000294. eCollection 2016.
10
Incretin-based drugs for type 2 diabetes: Focus on East Asian perspectives.基于肠降血糖素的药物治疗 2 型糖尿病:关注东亚视角。
J Diabetes Investig. 2016 Apr;7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):102-9. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12490. Epub 2016 Apr 18.