1 Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
2 University of Cologne, Germany.
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2019 May;23(2):161-189. doi: 10.1177/1088868318763261. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
Associative attitude learning is typically viewed as a low-level process that automatically registers mere co-occurrences between stimuli, independent of their validity and relational meaning. This view invites to critically examine how attitude formation conforms to four operating conditions (i.e., unawareness, efficiency, goal independence, and uncontrollability) and two operating principles (i.e., unqualified registration of mere co-occurrences between stimuli and formation of direct stimulus-response links), which is the main purpose of the present contribution. The general discussion examines how contemporary attitude models endorse these conditions and principles. Overall, this contribution calls for (a) a nuanced understanding of the nature and scope of associative attitude learning, (b) a fine-grained understanding of how contemporary attitude models endorse conditions and principles reviewed here and find them relevant to their theorization of attitude formation, (c) a clarification of how direct and indirect evaluative measures relate to these conditions and principles, and (d) enhanced efforts in specifying contemporary attitude formation models.
联想态度学习通常被视为一种低级过程,它会自动记录刺激之间的单纯共现,而不考虑其有效性和关系意义。这种观点促使我们批判性地审视态度形成如何符合四个操作条件(即无意识性、效率、目标独立性和不可控性)和两个操作原则(即对刺激之间单纯共现的无条件记录和直接刺激-反应链接的形成),这是本研究的主要目的。总的来说,这一贡献探讨了当代态度模型如何认可这些条件和原则。总体而言,这一贡献呼吁:(a)对联想态度学习的本质和范围有一个细致的理解;(b)对当代态度模型如何认可这里所审查的条件和原则有一个细致的理解,并发现它们与自己的态度形成理论相关;(c)阐明直接和间接评价测量与这些条件和原则的关系;(d)加强具体的当代态度形成模型的努力。