Li Quanfu, Wang Wenjuan, Chen Gang, Deng Shuqin, Jiang Caihong, Chen Feng, Zhao Jun, Li Hui, Bai Xiaojun, Hu Yuliang, Da Lenggaowa, Wu Yungaowa, Jin Gaowa
Department of Medical Oncology, Ordos Central Hospital, 017000Ordos, Mongolia, China.
Ordos Central Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, 23th Yinjihuoluo Western Road, Ordos, 017000, China.
Open Med (Wars). 2018 Mar 15;13:29-34. doi: 10.1515/med-2018-0005. eCollection 2018.
To perform a prospective non-randomized comparison of the effectiveness and safety of combined neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant treatment with the standard multiple-day cisplatin regimen for the prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).
Patients being administered 3-day cisplatin-based chemotherapy (25 mg/m/d) who had never received aprepitant were given either the standard regimen (tropisetron and dexamethasone) or the aprepitant regimen (aprepitant plus tropisetron and dexamethasone). The primary endpoint was the complete response (CR) in the overall phase (OP, 0-120 h) between the combined aprepitant triple regimen group and the standard group. Secondary endpoints were the CR in the acute phase (AP, 0-24 h) and delay phase (DP, 25-120 h) between the two groups. The first time of vomiting was also compared by Kaplan-Meier curves. The impact of CINV on the quality of life was assessed by the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE). Aprepitant-related adverse effects (AEs) were also recorded.
A CR was achieved by 80.0% in the aprepitant group compared with 56.0% in the standard group during the OP (P =0.018)as well as during the DP. However, during the AP, the aprepitant and standard therapy groups achieved identical CR rates (98.0%, P =1.000). A longer time to first emesis was documented for the aprepitant group than for the standard group. No effect of CINV on quality of life as assessed by FLIE was reported by 44.7% of aprepitant therapy patients and 24.0% of standard therapy patients (P=0.035). The main aprepitant-related AEs were fatigue and constipation, but there was no significant difference between groups.
Combined aprepitant therapy is recommended for the prevention of multiple-day CINV because of its improved CINV control rate and safety.
对神经激肽-1拮抗剂阿瑞匹坦联合用药与标准多日顺铂方案预防顺铂所致恶心和呕吐(CINV)的有效性和安全性进行前瞻性非随机比较。
接受基于顺铂的3天化疗(25mg/m²/天)且从未接受过阿瑞匹坦治疗的患者,被给予标准方案(托烷司琼和地塞米松)或阿瑞匹坦方案(阿瑞匹坦加托烷司琼和地塞米松)。主要终点是阿瑞匹坦三联联合用药组与标准组在整个阶段(OP,0 - 120小时)的完全缓解(CR)情况。次要终点是两组在急性期(AP,0 - 24小时)和延迟期(DP,25 - 120小时)的CR情况。首次呕吐时间也通过Kaplan-Meier曲线进行比较。通过功能生活指数-呕吐(FLIE)评估CINV对生活质量的影响。还记录了与阿瑞匹坦相关的不良反应(AE)。
在整个阶段(OP)以及延迟期,阿瑞匹坦组的CR率为80.0%,而标准组为56.0%(P = 0.018)。然而,在急性期,阿瑞匹坦组和标准治疗组的CR率相同(98.0%,P = 1.000)。记录显示阿瑞匹坦组首次呕吐的时间比标准组更长。44.7%的阿瑞匹坦治疗患者和24.0%的标准治疗患者报告CINV对生活质量无影响(P = 0.035)。与阿瑞匹坦相关的主要AE是疲劳和便秘,但两组之间无显著差异。
由于其改善的CINV控制率和安全性,推荐联合使用阿瑞匹坦治疗预防多日CINV。