Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, SE, Brazil.
Department of Preventive and Community Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlandia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.
Int Endod J. 2018 Oct;51(10):1104-1117. doi: 10.1111/iej.12926. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of mepivacaine and lidocaine for pulpal anaesthesia and pain control when administered via an inferior alveolar nerve block during the root canal treatment of mandibular molars in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. A research protocol was developed and registered in PROSPERO. The systematic search was conducted during May 2017 in eight databases. The studies were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two examiners analysed the sample independently, decided the eligibility for inclusion and classified the articles according to their quality. Statistical analysis was performed with Mantel-Haenszel and I-square (I ) tests considering a confidence interval of 95%. The initial sample consisted of 1130 articles, out of which four were eligible. The articles were published between 1993 and 2016. For both pulpal anaesthesia and pain control, there was no significant difference between mepivacaine and lidocaine (P = 0.843, I = 0%, and P = 0.183, I = 21.1%, respectively). Mepivacaine and lidocaine were similarly effective for pulpal anaesthesia and pain control after inferior alveolar nerve blocks for root canal treatment.
本研究旨在比较在下颌磨牙根管治疗中,使用下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉时,甲哌卡因和利多卡因在牙髓麻醉和疼痛控制方面的效果,这些患者患有症状性不可复性牙髓炎。研究方案在 PROSPERO 中制定并注册。系统搜索于 2017 年 5 月在八个数据库中进行。根据纳入和排除标准选择研究。两名检查者独立分析样本,决定纳入的资格,并根据质量对文章进行分类。统计分析采用 Mantel-Haenszel 和 I 平方(I )检验,置信区间为 95%。初始样本包括 1130 篇文章,其中有 4 篇符合条件。这些文章发表于 1993 年至 2016 年之间。对于牙髓麻醉和疼痛控制,甲哌卡因和利多卡因之间没有显著差异(P=0.843,I=0%,和 P=0.183,I=21.1%)。在下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉下,甲哌卡因和利多卡因在根管治疗中对牙髓麻醉和疼痛控制的效果相似。