Department of Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Proteomics. 2018 May;18(9):e1700432. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201700432. Epub 2018 Apr 15.
Immobilized trypsin (IM) has been recognized as an alternative to free trypsin (FT) for accelerating protein digestion 30 years ago. However, some questions of IM still need to be answered. How does the solid matrix of IM influence its preference for protein cleavage and how well can IM perform for deep bottom-up proteomics compared to FT? By analyzing Escherichia coli proteome samples digested with amine or carboxyl functionalized magnetic bead-based IM (IM-N or IM-C) or FT, it is observed that IM-N with the nearly neutral solid matrix, IM-C with the negatively charged solid matrix, and FT have similar cleavage preference considering the microenvironment surrounding the cleavage sites. IM-N (15 min) and FT (12 h) both approach 9000 protein identifications (IDs) from a mouse brain proteome. Compared to FT, IM-N has no bias in the digestion of proteins that are involved in various biological processes, are located in different components of cells, have diverse functions, and are expressed in varying abundance. A high-throughput bottom-up proteomics workflow comprising IM-N-based rapid protein cleavage and fast CZE-MS/MS enables the completion of protein sample preparation, CZE-MS/MS analysis, and data analysis in only 3 h, resulting in 1000 protein IDs from the mouse brain proteome.
固定化胰蛋白酶(IM)在 30 年前被认为是加速蛋白质消化的游离胰蛋白酶(FT)的替代品。然而,IM 仍有一些问题需要回答。IM 的固体基质如何影响其对蛋白质切割的偏好,以及与 FT 相比,IM 在深度自上而下的蛋白质组学中表现如何?通过分析用胺或羧基功能化磁珠固定化胰蛋白酶(IM-N 或 IM-C)或 FT 消化的大肠杆菌蛋白质组样品,观察到具有近中性固体基质的 IM-N、具有负电荷固体基质的 IM-C 和 FT 具有相似的切割偏好,考虑到切割位点周围的微环境。IM-N(15 分钟)和 FT(12 小时)均从小鼠脑蛋白质组中获得约 9000 个蛋白质鉴定(IDs)。与 FT 相比,IM-N 对参与各种生物过程、位于细胞不同成分中、具有不同功能和表达丰度不同的蛋白质的消化没有偏见。基于 IM-N 的快速蛋白质切割和快速 CZE-MS/MS 的高通量自上而下蛋白质组学工作流程可在仅 3 小时内完成蛋白质样品制备、CZE-MS/MS 分析和数据分析,从而从小鼠脑蛋白质组中获得 1000 个蛋白质 IDs。