Cliniques universitaires UCL Saint-Luc, department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, avenue Hippocrate 10/1650, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium.
Cliniques universitaires UCL Saint-Luc, department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, avenue Hippocrate 10/1650, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium.
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Sep;61(5):323-338. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
Chronic musculoskeletal pain disorders are highly prevalent and have high personal and societal cost. Hence, early detection and care of patients at risk of developing chronic pain is important. Risk factors are well known and screening tools exist, but much less is known about the care of at-risk patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of secondary prevention strategies for musculoskeletal pain.
We performed a systematic review of clinical trials in which treatments were adjusted to the risk of chronicity in adults with acute or subacute musculoskeletal pain. Clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses published after January 1, 2000 were searched in PubMed and PEDro databases and in the reference list of relevant papers. The risk of bias was assessed by the PEDro score.
We identified 4807 potentially eligible articles; 13, corresponding to 9 studies, met the inclusion criteria. Most studies investigated low back pain. The overall risk of bias was moderate, mainly because of the difficulty of blinding in physiotherapy studies. As compared with a "one-size-fits-all" treatment, stratified programmes showed significant improvements in several domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: body structures and functions (pain, mood), activities (functional capacity), participation (return to work, quality of life), as well as environmental factors (healthcare consumption). Effect sizes were moderate. Overall, simple educational messages seemed sufficient for low-risk patients. Medium- and high-risk patients benefited from a physical reactivation programme combined with education. In high-risk patients, an additional cognitive-behavioural intervention further improved the outcome.
A stratified approach seems effective in reducing long-term disability in patients with musculoskeletal pain. However, more research is necessary to confirm these results.
慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛障碍的患病率很高,给个人和社会带来了巨大的负担。因此,早期发现和照顾有发生慢性疼痛风险的患者至关重要。风险因素已经广为人知,也有相应的筛查工具,但对于高危患者的护理,我们的了解要少得多。本研究旨在探讨肌肉骨骼疼痛的二级预防策略的有效性。
我们对成年人急性或亚急性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者中,根据慢性风险调整治疗的临床试验进行了系统评价。在 PubMed 和 PEDro 数据库以及相关文献的参考文献中,检索了 2000 年 1 月 1 日以后发表的临床试验、系统评价和荟萃分析。采用 PEDro 评分评估偏倚风险。
我们确定了 4807 篇可能符合条件的文章;符合纳入标准的有 13 篇,对应 9 项研究。大多数研究都调查了腰痛。总体偏倚风险为中度,主要是因为物理治疗研究中难以进行盲法。与“一刀切”的治疗方法相比,分层方案在国际功能、残疾和健康分类的多个领域显示出显著改善:身体结构和功能(疼痛、情绪)、活动(功能能力)、参与(重返工作岗位、生活质量),以及环境因素(医疗保健消费)。效应大小为中度。总体而言,对于低危患者,简单的教育信息似乎就足够了。中危和高危患者受益于物理再激活方案与教育相结合。在高危患者中,额外的认知行为干预进一步改善了结果。
分层方法似乎可以有效降低肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的长期残疾。然而,还需要更多的研究来证实这些结果。