Perry Gad
Am Nat. 1999 Jan;153(1):98-109. doi: 10.1086/303145.
Both theoretical and empirical studies, many of them on lizards, suggest that foraging behaviors often take one of two forms, sometimes called "modes": active search or sedentary ambush. I tested this by expanding the database on lizard foraging behaviors and testing for the existence of modality in this much larger database. My findings did not support the validity of some previous analyses. Greatly expanded lizard data did not show a bimodal distribution of foraging behaviors. Phylogeny, however, was a strong predictor of behavior. One clade, Autarchoglossa, was characterized by a wide range of foraging behaviors, but closely related species tended to exhibit similar behaviors. Two other clades, Iguania and Gekkota, retain the ancestral sedentary behavior. This phylogenetic trend, combined with phylogenetically biased sampling, may have been responsible for the appearance of bimodality in previous studies. Thus, bimodality of search modes is rejected. Some previous generalizations regarding correlates of foraging "mode" need to be reevaluated in this light.
理论研究和实证研究(其中许多研究以蜥蜴为对象)均表明,觅食行为通常呈现两种形式,有时被称为“模式”:主动搜寻或静伏伏击。我通过扩充蜥蜴觅食行为数据库并在这个大得多的数据库中检验模式的存在来对此进行了测试。我的研究结果并不支持之前一些分析的有效性。大幅扩充后的蜥蜴数据并未显示出觅食行为的双峰分布。然而,系统发育是行为的一个强有力的预测指标。有一个分支,即硬舌亚目,其特点是具有广泛的觅食行为,但亲缘关系相近的物种往往表现出相似的行为。另外两个分支,鬣蜥亚目和壁虎亚目,则保留了祖传的静伏行为。这种系统发育趋势,再加上系统发育偏向性抽样,可能是导致先前研究中出现双峰性的原因。因此,搜寻模式的双峰性被否定。鉴于此,一些先前关于觅食“模式”相关因素的概括需要重新评估。