• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜胃癌手术中技术性能对临床结果的预测作用。

Technical Performance as a Predictor of Clinical Outcomes in Laparoscopic Gastric Cancer Surgery.

机构信息

International Centre for Surgical Safety, Keenan Institute for Biomedical Science, St. Michael's Hospital, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2019 Jul;270(1):115-120. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002741.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002741
PMID:29578907
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between technical performance and patient outcomes in laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer is an advanced procedure with high rate of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Many variables including patient, disease, and perioperative management factors have been shown to impact postoperative outcomes; however, the role of surgical performance is insufficiently investigated.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed for all patients who had undergone laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer at 3 teaching institutions between 2009 and 2015. Patients with available, unedited video-recording of their procedure were included in the study. Video files were rated for technical performance, using Objective Structured Assessments of Technical Skills (OSATS) and Generic Error Rating Tool instruments. The main outcome variable was major short-term complications. The effect of technical performance on patient outcomes was assessed using logistic regression analysis with backward selection strategy.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients with available video recordings were included in the study. The overall complication rate was 29.5%. The mean Charlson comorbidity index, type of procedure, and the global OSATS score were included in the final predictive model. Lower performance score (OSATS ≤29) remained an independent predictor for major short-term outcomes (odds ratio 6.49), while adjusting for comorbidities and type of procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative technical performance predicts major short-term outcomes in laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer. Ongoing assessment and enhancement of surgical skills using modern, evidence-based strategies might improve short-term patient outcomes. Future work should focus on developing and studying the effectiveness of such interventions in laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估腹腔镜胃癌手术中技术表现与患者结局之间的关系。

背景

腹腔镜胃癌切除术是一种先进的手术,其术后发病率和死亡率较高。许多变量,包括患者、疾病和围手术期管理因素,已被证明会影响术后结局;然而,手术表现的作用尚未得到充分研究。

方法

对 2009 年至 2015 年间在 3 所教学医院接受腹腔镜胃癌切除术的所有患者进行了回顾性研究。将有可用、未经编辑的手术视频记录的患者纳入研究。使用客观结构化评估技术技能(OSATS)和通用错误评分工具对视频文件进行技术表现评分。主要结局变量为主要短期并发症。使用具有后向选择策略的逻辑回归分析评估技术表现对患者结局的影响。

结果

研究纳入了 61 名有可用视频记录的患者。总并发症发生率为 29.5%。Charlson 合并症指数、手术类型和全球 OSATS 评分均值纳入最终预测模型。较低的表现评分(OSATS≤29)仍然是主要短期结局的独立预测因素(比值比 6.49),同时调整了合并症和手术类型。

结论

腹腔镜胃癌手术中术中技术表现可预测主要短期结局。使用现代基于证据的策略持续评估和提高手术技能可能会改善短期患者结局。未来的工作应集中在开发和研究此类干预措施在腹腔镜胃癌手术中的有效性。

相似文献

1
Technical Performance as a Predictor of Clinical Outcomes in Laparoscopic Gastric Cancer Surgery.腹腔镜胃癌手术中技术性能对临床结果的预测作用。
Ann Surg. 2019 Jul;270(1):115-120. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002741.
2
Total and Subtotal Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for the Treatment of Advanced Gastric Cancer: Morbidity and Oncological Outcomes.全腹腔镜和次全腹腔镜胃切除术治疗进展期胃癌:发病率及肿瘤学结局
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Mar;28(3):278-285. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0372. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
3
Eleven-year experience with 3000 cases of laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery in a single institution: analysis of postoperative morbidities and long-term oncologic outcomes.单一机构3000例腹腔镜胃癌手术的11年经验:术后发病率及长期肿瘤学结局分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):3965-75. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4708-6. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
4
Laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in the elderly patients.老年患者胃癌的腹腔镜胃切除术
Surg Endosc. 2016 Apr;30(4):1380-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4340-5. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
5
Outcomes and survival after laparoscopic gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma. Analysis on 65 patients operated on by conventional or robot-assisted minimal access procedures.腹腔镜胃癌根治术治疗腺癌后的疗效与生存情况。对65例行传统或机器人辅助微创手术的患者进行分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009 Mar;35(3):281-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.02.001. Epub 2008 Mar 14.
6
Totally laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a matched retrospective cohort study.完全腹腔镜手术与开放胃切除术治疗进展期胃癌:一项配对回顾性队列研究
Hong Kong Med J. 2019 Feb;25(1):30-7. doi: 10.12809/hkmj177150. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
7
Laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery: Current evidence and future perspectives.腹腔镜胃癌手术:当前证据与未来展望。
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan 14;22(2):727-35. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.727.
8
Impact of age and comorbidity on the short-term surgical outcome after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma.年龄和合并症对腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗腺癌术后短期手术结局的影响
Am Surg. 2013 Jan;79(1):40-8.
9
[Preliminary experience of dual-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer].[双端口腹腔镜远端胃癌切除术的初步经验]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Jan 25;22(1):35-42.
10
Randomized, controlled trial comparing clinical outcomes of 3D and 2D laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer: an interim report.比较3D与2D腹腔镜胃癌手术临床结局的随机对照试验:中期报告
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jul;31(7):2939-2945. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5310-2. Epub 2016 Nov 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Error-based assessment of technical performance in pediatric laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using the generic error rating tool: a retrospective observational study.使用通用错误评分工具对小儿腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术技术性能进行基于错误的评估:一项回顾性观察研究。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul 18. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12022-7.
2
Short-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score-matched or baseline-balanced retrospective studies.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗近端胃癌的短期疗效:倾向评分匹配或基线平衡的回顾性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 23;19(1):318. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02415-0.
3
Surgical manipulation related to the risk of postoperative complications in laparoscopic gastrectomy: a case-control study assessing full surgical videos.
腹腔镜胃切除术中与术后并发症风险相关的手术操作:一项评估完整手术视频的病例对照研究
Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2406-2414. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11605-8. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
4
Comparison of surgical results and technical performance between robotic and laparoscopic approaches for Kasai portoenterostomy in biliary atresia: a multicenter retrospective study.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下Kasai肝门空肠吻合术治疗胆道闭锁的手术结果及技术操作比较:一项多中心回顾性研究
Surg Endosc. 2025 Feb;39(2):1128-1139. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11452-z. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
5
Automated analysis of operative video in surgical training: scoping review.手术训练中手术视频的自动化分析:范围综述。
BJS Open. 2024 Sep 3;8(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae124.
6
Initial surgical performance in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with clinical outcomes and learning curves.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的初始手术表现与临床结果和学习曲线相关。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5634-5642. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11127-9. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
7
Reply to: "Preoperative COVID-19 and Postoperative Mortality in Cancer Surgery: Correspondence", by Daungsupawong and Wiwanitkit.对Daungsupawong和Wiwanitkit所著《癌症手术中的术前COVID-19与术后死亡率:通信》的回复
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(10):6417-6418. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15992-5. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
8
Surgeon Skill and Perioperative Outcomes in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy.机器人辅助部分肾切除术的外科医生技能和围手术期结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2421696. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.21696.
9
Nationwide Association of Surgical Performance of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy With Patient Outcomes.全国范围内微创食管切除术手术表现与患者结局的关联协会。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e246556. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.6556.
10
Current trends and barriers to video management and analytics as a tool for surgeon skilling.当前视频管理和分析作为一种外科医生技能提升工具的趋势和障碍。
Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2542-2552. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10754-6. Epub 2024 Mar 14.