Laboratorio de Fisiología Gastrointestinal, Centro de Biofísica y Bioquímica, Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas (IVIC), Caracas, Venezuela.
Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, College of Life Science, Sejong University, Seoul, South Korea.
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 26;13(3):e0194857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194857. eCollection 2018.
Gut bacterial communities have been shown to be influenced by diet, host phylogeny and anatomy, but most of these studies have been done in captive animals. Here we compare the bacterial communities in the digestive tract of wild birds. We characterized the gizzard and intestinal microbiota among 8 wild Neotropical bird species, granivorous or frugivorous species of the orders Columbiformes and Passeriformes. We sequenced the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene in 94 collected samples from 32 wild birds from 5 localities, and compared bacterial communities by foraging guild, organ, locality and bird taxonomy. 16S rRNA gene-based sequencing data were examined using QIIME with linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) and metabolic pathways were predicted using PICRUSt algorism. We identified 8 bacterial phyla, dominated by Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria. Beta diversity analyses indicated significant separation of gut communities by bird orders (Columbiformes vs. Passerifomes) and between bird species (p<0.01). In lower intestine, PICRUSt shows a predominance of carbohydrate metabolism in granivorous birds and xenobiotics biodegradation pathways in frugivorous birds. Gizzard microbiota was significantly richer in granivorous, in relation to frugivorous birds (Chao 1; non-parametric t-test, p<0.05), suggesting a microbial gizzard function, beyond grinding food. The results suggest that the most important factor separating the bacterial community structure was bird taxonomy, followed by foraging guild. However, variation between localities is also likely to be important, but this could not been assessed with our study design.
肠道细菌群落已被证明受饮食、宿主进化史和解剖结构的影响,但这些研究大多是在圈养动物中进行的。在这里,我们比较了野生鸟类消化道中的细菌群落。我们对 8 种新热带鸟类的砂囊和肠道微生物群进行了特征描述,这些鸟类是 Columbiformes 和 Passeriformes 目下的食谷鸟或食果鸟。我们从 5 个地点的 32 只野生鸟类中收集了 94 个样本,对其 16S rRNA 基因的 V4 区进行了测序,并通过觅食群体、器官、地点和鸟类分类学比较了细菌群落。使用 QIIME 基于 16S rRNA 基因的测序数据进行了线性判别分析效应大小(LEfSe)分析,并使用 PICRUSt 算法预测了代谢途径。我们确定了 8 个细菌门,主要由厚壁菌门、放线菌门和变形菌门组成。β多样性分析表明,鸟类目(Columbiformes 与 Passerifomes)和鸟类种间(p<0.01)的肠道群落有明显分离。在小肠中,PICRUSt 显示出食谷鸟中碳水化合物代谢和食果鸟中异生物质生物降解途径的优势。与食果鸟相比,食谷鸟的砂囊中微生物更为丰富(Chao 1;非参数 t 检验,p<0.05),这表明砂囊除了研磨食物外,还具有微生物功能。结果表明,分离细菌群落结构的最重要因素是鸟类分类学,其次是觅食群体。然而,由于我们的研究设计,地点之间的差异也可能很重要,但这无法进行评估。