Gastrointestinal Laboratory, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, 4474 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-4474, USA.
Vet Microbiol. 2010 Dec 15;146(3-4):320-5. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.05.024. Epub 2010 May 27.
The gastrointestinal microbiota plays a fundamental role in health and disease. Only limited data are available about the composition of the intestinal microbiota of captive animals compared to those of wild animals. The aim of the present study was to characterize the cloacal microbiota of apparently healthy wild and captive parrots. A total of 16 parrots, 8 wild and 8 captive, belonging to 3 different species, were used in this study. Cloacal material was collected via cloacal swabbing. DNA was extracted and 16S rRNA genes were amplified using universal bacterial primers. Constructed 16S rRNA gene clone libraries were compared between groups. A total of 518 clones were analyzed, and 49 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were identified. The OTUs were classified in 4 bacterial phyla: Firmicutes (72.9%), Proteobacteria (14.9%), Actinobacteria (12%), and Bacteroidetes (0.2%). Bacterial diversity was significantly lower in wild birds than in captive birds. Principal component analysis based on the Unifrac distance metric indicated that the cloacal microbiota differed between wild and captive parrots. Staphylococcus saprophyticus was significantly more abundant in wild birds, while Escherichia coli was significantly more abundant in captive birds. In conclusion, wild and captive parrots appear to have differences in the composition of their cloacal bacterial microbiota. The clinical significance of these differences remains to be determined.
胃肠道微生物群在健康和疾病中起着至关重要的作用。与野生动物相比,关于圈养动物肠道微生物群的组成,只有有限的数据。本研究的目的是描述明显健康的野生和圈养鹦鹉的腔道微生物群。本研究共使用了 16 只鹦鹉,8 只野生和 8 只圈养,属于 3 个不同的物种。通过腔道拭子收集腔道材料。提取 DNA 并使用通用细菌引物扩增 16S rRNA 基因。比较组间构建的 16S rRNA 基因克隆文库。共分析了 518 个克隆,鉴定了 49 个操作分类单位 (OTU)。OTUs 分为 4 个细菌门:厚壁菌门 (72.9%)、变形菌门 (14.9%)、放线菌门 (12%) 和拟杆菌门 (0.2%)。野生鸟类的细菌多样性明显低于圈养鸟类。基于 Unifrac 距离度量的主成分分析表明,野生和圈养鹦鹉的腔道微生物群不同。腐生葡萄球菌在野生鸟类中明显更为丰富,而大肠杆菌在圈养鸟类中明显更为丰富。总之,野生和圈养鹦鹉的腔道细菌微生物群组成似乎存在差异。这些差异的临床意义仍有待确定。