• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估前列腺癌患者及其伴侣的心理社会干预:一项随机对照试验的结果和经验教训。

Evaluating a psychosocial intervention for men with prostate cancer and their partners: Outcomes and lessons learned from a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Institute of Nursing and Health Research, University of Ulster, Newtownabbey, UK.

Faculty of Life Sciences, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, UK.

出版信息

Appl Nurs Res. 2018 Apr;40:143-151. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.apnr.2018.01.008
PMID:29579490
Abstract

AIM

This study evaluated the process and outcome of a psychosocial intervention for men with prostate cancer and their partners. As more men survive prostate cancer, they and their partners need help and support to help them cope with the physical and psychosocial effects of the disease and treatment. There is a lack of psychosocial interventions for men with prostate cancer and their partners.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 34 participants to measure the effects of the intervention on selected psychosocial outcomes, post-intervention and at one month' follow-up. The nine-week program (CONNECT) consisted of three group and two telephone sessions. It focused on symptom management, sexual dysfunction, uncertainty management, positive thinking and couple communication. The outcomes, measured by validated tools were: self-efficacy, quality of life, symptom distress, communication, uncertainty and illness benefits.

RESULTS

The men in the intervention group did better on two outcomes (communication and support) than controls. Partners in the intervention group did better than controls on most outcomes. Less participants than expected participated in the trial. The reasons for non-participation included partners not wishing to participate, men not interested in group work, and not understanding the core purpose of the intervention. The cost of training facilitators and for delivering the intervention appeared to be low.

CONCLUSION

The knowledge generated from this study will be beneficial for all those grappling with the challenges of developing, implementing and evaluating complex psychosocial interventions. This study has also highlighted the difficulties in recruiting men and their partners in clinical trials.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了一项针对前列腺癌男性及其伴侣的心理社会干预的过程和结果。随着越来越多的男性幸存于前列腺癌,他们及其伴侣需要帮助和支持,以帮助他们应对疾病和治疗的身体和心理社会影响。目前针对前列腺癌男性及其伴侣的心理社会干预措施不足。

方法

采用随机对照试验,对 34 名参与者进行了测量,以评估干预对选定心理社会结果的影响,包括干预后和一个月随访时的结果。为期九周的方案(CONNECT)由三组和两次电话会议组成。它侧重于症状管理、性功能障碍、不确定性管理、积极思维和夫妻沟通。通过验证工具测量的结果包括自我效能感、生活质量、症状困扰、沟通、不确定性和疾病获益。

结果

干预组的男性在两个结果(沟通和支持)上的表现优于对照组。干预组的伴侣在大多数结果上的表现优于对照组。参与试验的人数少于预期。不参与的原因包括伴侣不想参与、男性对小组工作不感兴趣、以及不理解干预的核心目的。培训协调员和提供干预的成本似乎较低。

结论

本研究产生的知识将对所有那些在制定、实施和评估复杂心理社会干预方面面临挑战的人有益。本研究还强调了在临床试验中招募男性及其伴侣的困难。

相似文献

1
Evaluating a psychosocial intervention for men with prostate cancer and their partners: Outcomes and lessons learned from a randomized controlled trial.评估前列腺癌患者及其伴侣的心理社会干预:一项随机对照试验的结果和经验教训。
Appl Nurs Res. 2018 Apr;40:143-151. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
2
A randomized controlled trial of a self-management psychosocial intervention for men with prostate cancer and their partners: a study protocol.一项针对前列腺癌患者及其伴侣的自我管理心理社会干预的随机对照试验:研究方案。
J Adv Nurs. 2013 Nov;69(11):2572-83. doi: 10.1111/jan.12132. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
3
Randomized clinical trial of a family intervention for prostate cancer patients and their spouses.针对前列腺癌患者及其配偶的家庭干预随机临床试验。
Cancer. 2007 Dec 15;110(12):2809-18. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23114.
4
Psychosocial interventions for men with prostate cancer.针对前列腺癌男性患者的心理社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 24;2013(12):CD008529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008529.pub3.
5
Couple-focused interventions for men with localized prostate cancer and their spouses: A randomized clinical trial.聚焦于夫妻的干预措施对局限性前列腺癌男性及其配偶的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Br J Health Psychol. 2019 May;24(2):396-418. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12359. Epub 2019 Mar 10.
6
A pilot randomized controlled trial of the feasibility of a self-directed coping skills intervention for couples facing prostate cancer: rationale and design.一项针对面临前列腺癌的夫妇的自我指导应对技能干预的可行性的初步随机对照试验:原理和设计。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Sep 26;10:119. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-119.
7
Psychosocial interventions for men with prostate cancer: a Cochrane systematic review.前列腺癌男性患者的心理社会干预:Cochrane系统评价
BJU Int. 2015 Aug;116(2):174-83. doi: 10.1111/bju.12989. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
8
Communication and intimacy-enhancing interventions for men diagnosed with prostate cancer and their partners.诊断患有前列腺癌的男性及其伴侣的沟通和增进亲密关系的干预措施。
J Sex Med. 2013 Feb;10 Suppl 1(0 1):127-32. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12049.
9
Five-year outcomes from a randomised controlled trial of a couples-based intervention for men with localised prostate cancer.基于夫妇的干预对局限性前列腺癌男性的随机对照试验的 5 年结果。
Psychooncology. 2019 Apr;28(4):775-783. doi: 10.1002/pon.5019. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
10
Efficacy of problem-solving therapy for spouses of men with prostate cancer: A randomized controlled trial.问题解决疗法对前列腺癌男性配偶的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Psychooncology. 2019 Mar;28(3):497-504. doi: 10.1002/pon.4964. Epub 2018 Dec 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of mobile health in symptom management of prostate cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.移动健康在前列腺癌患者症状管理中的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Digit Health. 2025 May 7;7:1584764. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1584764. eCollection 2025.
2
The effectiveness of dyadic interventions for health outcomes of prostate cancer patients and informal caregivers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.针对前列腺癌患者及其非正式照护者健康结局的二元干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Feb 3;24(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02769-8.
3
Effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on perioperative anxiety and sleep quality in elderly patients with digestive tract malignancies.
综合护理干预对老年消化道恶性肿瘤患者围手术期焦虑及睡眠质量的影响
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Oct 15;14(10):7189-7198. eCollection 2022.
4
Effectiveness and moderators of cancer patient-caregiver dyad interventions in improving psychological distress: A systematic review and meta-analysis.癌症患者-照顾者二元干预在改善心理困扰方面的有效性及调节因素:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2022 Jun 8;9(8):100104. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.100104. eCollection 2022 Aug.
5
The development and evaluation of a web-based complex intervention: The caring for couples coping with colorectal cancer "4Cs: CRC" program.基于网络的综合干预措施的开发与评估:关爱结直肠癌夫妇的“4C:CRC”项目。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2022 Mar 9;9(5):100050. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.03.002. eCollection 2022 May.
6
The Challenges of Enrollment and Retention: A Systematic Review of Psychosocial Behavioral Interventions for Patients With Cancer and Their Family Caregivers.纳入和保留的挑战:癌症患者及其家庭照顾者的心理社会行为干预的系统评价。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Sep;62(3):e279-e304. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.04.019. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
7
Effects of Dyadic Interventions on Quality of Life among Cancer Patients: An Integrative Review.二元干预对癌症患者生活质量的影响:一项综合综述。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2021 Jan 29;8(2):115-131. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_63_20. eCollection 2021 Mar-Apr.
8
Systematic review of illness uncertainty management interventions for cancer patients and their family caregivers.癌症患者及其家庭照顾者疾病不确定性管理干预措施的系统评价
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Aug;29(8):4623-4640. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05931-x. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
9
The Effect of Pelvic Floor Muscle Strengthening Exercise on Urinary Incontinence and Quality of Life in Patients after Prostatectomy: a Randomized Clinical Trial.盆底肌强化运动对前列腺切除术后患者尿失禁及生活质量的影响:一项随机临床试验
J Caring Sci. 2020 Mar 1;9(1):33-38. doi: 10.34172/jcs.2020.006. eCollection 2020 Mar.
10
A qualitative study of the factors influencing recruitment to a pilot trial on the prevention of striae gravidarum.一项关于影响妊娠纹预防试验招募因素的定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Feb 12;20(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2781-x.