• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二元干预对癌症患者生活质量的影响:一项综合综述。

Effects of Dyadic Interventions on Quality of Life among Cancer Patients: An Integrative Review.

作者信息

Sharma Abha, Saneha Chongjit, Phligbua Warunee

机构信息

Faculty of Nursing, Mahidol University, Thailand.

出版信息

Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2021 Jan 29;8(2):115-131. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_63_20. eCollection 2021 Mar-Apr.

DOI:10.4103/apjon.apjon_63_20
PMID:33688560
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7934590/
Abstract

Interventions delivered to cancer patients along with their caregiver as a unit of care indicates dyadic intervention. With the shift of care to home, dyadic interventions are being popular among cancer care. This review aims to identify the dyadic interventions targeting quality of life (QOL) of cancer patient. The current review examined different dyadic interventions for cancer patients from January 2009 to January 2020. PubMed, Psych-info, and CINAHL databases were searched, and 27 studies were included in the review. There were different dyadic interventions for cancer patients including skill based, psychosocial (psycho-educational, educational, counseling), yoga, mindfulness, coping, dance, writing, training along with education, and counseling. Interventions were different in mode of delivery, duration, and delivery personnel. Interventions had improved some aspects of QOL among cancer patients as well as caregivers. Although some aspects of QOL were improved, precise dose and use of different approaches together could be integrated to develop further interventions. Further intervention based on strong theoretical framework guided by the standard protocol is recommended.

摘要

将干预措施作为一个护理单元同时提供给癌症患者及其照护者,这被称为二元干预。随着护理向家庭的转变,二元干预在癌症护理中越来越受欢迎。本综述旨在确定针对癌症患者生活质量(QOL)的二元干预措施。当前的综述研究了2009年1月至2020年1月期间针对癌症患者的不同二元干预措施。检索了PubMed、Psych-info和CINAHL数据库,共有27项研究纳入该综述。针对癌症患者有不同的二元干预措施,包括基于技能的、心理社会的(心理教育、教育、咨询)、瑜伽、正念、应对、舞蹈、写作、培训加教育以及咨询。干预措施在实施方式、持续时间和实施人员方面存在差异。这些干预措施改善了癌症患者及其照护者生活质量的某些方面。尽管生活质量的某些方面得到了改善,但可以整合不同方法的精确剂量和联合使用,以开发进一步的干预措施。建议在标准方案指导下基于强大的理论框架进行进一步干预。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04a2/7934590/008e6d4ccf80/APJON-8-115-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04a2/7934590/008e6d4ccf80/APJON-8-115-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04a2/7934590/008e6d4ccf80/APJON-8-115-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of Dyadic Interventions on Quality of Life among Cancer Patients: An Integrative Review.二元干预对癌症患者生活质量的影响:一项综合综述。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2021 Jan 29;8(2):115-131. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_63_20. eCollection 2021 Mar-Apr.
2
A critical literature review of dyadic web-based interventions to support cancer patients and their caregivers, and directions for future research.关于支持癌症患者及其照护者的双体网络干预的关键文献综述,以及未来研究的方向。
Psychooncology. 2020 Jan;29(1):38-48. doi: 10.1002/pon.5278. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
3
Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer.针对癌症患者非正式照护者的心理社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 17;6(6):CD009912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009912.pub2.
4
Association between dyadic interventions and outcomes in cancer patients: a meta-analysis.**对偶干预与癌症患者结局的关联:一项荟萃分析**。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Mar;27(3):745-761. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4556-8. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
5
The application of eHealth in cancer survivorship care: A review of web-based dyadic interventions for post-treatment cancer survivors and caregivers.电子健康在癌症幸存者护理中的应用:对基于网络的针对癌症治疗后幸存者及其照护者的二元干预措施的综述。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2022 Jun 30;9(10):100109. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.100109. eCollection 2022 Oct.
6
Dyadic psycho-social interventions for stroke survivors and family caregivers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.双元心理社会干预对脑卒中幸存者及其家庭照顾者的影响:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Oct;79(10):3707-3726. doi: 10.1111/jan.15781. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
7
A systematic review of spousal couple-based intervention studies for couples coping with cancer: direction for the development of interventions.一项针对应对癌症的夫妻的基于配偶伴侣的干预研究的系统评价:干预措施的发展方向
Psychooncology. 2014 Jul;23(7):731-9. doi: 10.1002/pon.3535. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
8
Effectiveness of a nurse-delivered (FOCUS+) and a web-based (iFOCUS) psychoeducational intervention for people with advanced cancer and their family caregivers (DIAdIC): study protocol for an international randomized controlled trial.护士主导的(FOCUS+)和基于网络的(iFOCUS)心理教育干预对晚期癌症患者及其家庭照护者的有效性(DIAdIC):一项国际随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Dec 28;20(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00895-z.
9
Effectiveness of dyadic psychoeducational intervention for stroke survivors and family caregivers on functional and psychosocial health: A systematic review and meta-analysis.双体心理教育干预对脑卒中幸存者及其家庭照顾者的功能和心理社会健康的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Aug;120:103969. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103969. Epub 2021 May 5.
10
Dyadic versus individual delivery of a yoga program for family caregivers of glioma patients undergoing radiotherapy: Results of a 3-arm randomized controlled trial.针对行放疗的脑胶质瘤患者家庭照顾者的瑜伽项目的对偶与个体交付:一项 3 臂随机对照试验的结果。
Cancer Med. 2023 Mar;12(6):7567-7579. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5514. Epub 2022 Dec 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of unmet needs on the health-related Quality of life of family caregivers of cancer patients in South Korea.未满足的需求对韩国癌症患者家庭照顾者健康相关生活质量的影响。
PLoS One. 2025 May 2;20(5):e0321900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321900. eCollection 2025.
2
Developing and implementing a nurse-delivered and a web-based dyadic psychoeducational program for people with advanced cancer and their family caregivers: sharing experiences from a three-arm international randomized controlled trial (DIAdIC).为晚期癌症患者及其家庭照护者开发并实施一项由护士提供的基于网络的二元心理教育项目:分享一项三臂国际随机对照试验(DIAdIC)的经验。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2025 Feb 17;19:26323524241310458. doi: 10.1177/26323524241310458. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Dyadic Interventions for Cancer Survivors and Caregivers: State of the Science and New Directions.癌症幸存者及其照顾者的对偶干预:科学现状和新方向。
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2019 Aug;35(4):337-341. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
2
Effect of Wellness Education on Quality of Life of Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With First-Line Icotinib and on Their Family Caregivers.基于一线埃克替尼治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者及其家庭照顾者的健康教育培训对生活质量的影响。
Integr Cancer Ther. 2019 Jan-Dec;18:1534735419842373. doi: 10.1177/1534735419842373.
3
Dyadic yoga program for patients undergoing thoracic radiotherapy and their family caregivers: Results of a pilot randomized controlled trial.
Novel Definitions of Wellness and Distress among Family Caregivers of Patients with Acute Cardiorespiratory Failure: A Qualitative Study.急性心肺衰竭患者的家庭照料者中新型的健康和压力定义:一项定性研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2024 May;21(5):782-793. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202310-904OC.
4
How both positive and burdensome caregiver experiences are associated with care recipient cognitive performance: Evidence from the National Health and Aging Trends Study and National Study of Caregiving.积极和负担重的照护者体验如何与照护对象的认知表现相关:来自国家健康老龄化趋势研究和国家照护研究的证据。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 13;11:1130099. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1130099. eCollection 2023.
5
Quality of Life vs. Supportive Care Needs for Oral Cancer Caregivers: Are They Related?生活质量与口腔癌照顾者的支持性护理需求:它们相关吗?
Curr Oncol. 2023 Feb 1;30(2):1733-1744. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30020134.
6
Effects of dyadic-based physical activity intervention on cancer-related fatigue among cancer survivors: A scoping review.基于二元组的体育活动干预对癌症幸存者癌症相关疲劳的影响:一项范围综述。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 25;14:1102019. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1102019. eCollection 2023.
双人瑜伽项目对接受胸部放射治疗的患者及其家庭照护者的影响:一项试点随机对照试验的结果。
Psychooncology. 2019 Mar;28(3):615-621. doi: 10.1002/pon.4991. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
4
Being Present: A single-arm feasibility study of audio-based mindfulness meditation for colorectal cancer patients and caregivers.在场:基于音频的正念冥想对结直肠癌患者和照护者的单臂可行性研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 23;13(7):e0199423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199423. eCollection 2018.
5
Evaluating a psychosocial intervention for men with prostate cancer and their partners: Outcomes and lessons learned from a randomized controlled trial.评估前列腺癌患者及其伴侣的心理社会干预:一项随机对照试验的结果和经验教训。
Appl Nurs Res. 2018 Apr;40:143-151. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
6
Quality of Life among Cancer Patients.癌症患者的生活质量。
Indian J Palliat Care. 2017 Oct-Dec;23(4):445-450. doi: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_82_17.
7
A Randomized Clinical Trial of Caregiver-Delivered Reflexology for Symptom Management During Breast Cancer Treatment.一项针对乳腺癌治疗期间症状管理的基于随机对照临床试验。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Nov;54(5):670-679. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.07.037. Epub 2017 Jul 23.
8
Effects of couple based coping intervention on self-efficacy and quality of life in patients with resected lung cancer.夫妻应对干预对肺癌根治术后患者自我效能和生活质量的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Dec;100(12):2297-2302. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
9
Effectiveness of implementing a dyadic psychoeducational intervention for cancer patients and family caregivers.对癌症患者及其家庭照顾者实施二元心理教育干预的效果
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Nov;25(11):3395-3406. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3758-9. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
10
Examining the effect of peer helping in a coping skills intervention: a randomized controlled trial for advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients and their family caregivers.检查同伴帮助在应对技能干预中的效果:一项针对晚期胃肠道癌患者及其家庭照顾者的随机对照试验。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Feb;27(2):515-528. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1620-7. Epub 2017 Jun 10.