• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

八分量表认知负荷量表的初步心理计量学评估。

A preliminary psychometric evaluation of the eight-item cognitive load scale.

机构信息

Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.

Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States.

出版信息

Appl Nurs Res. 2018 Apr;40:99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.apnr.2018.01.006
PMID:29579506
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5873589/
Abstract

AIM

The aim of this article is to report the psychometric properties of the eight-item cognitive load scale.

BACKGROUND

According to cognitive load theory, the formatting and delivery of healthcare education influences the degree to which patients and/or family members can engage their working memory systems for learning. However, despite its relevance, cognitive load has not yet been evaluated among surrogate decision makers exposed to electronic decision support for healthcare decisions. To date, no psychometric analyses of instruments evaluating cognitive load have been reported within healthcare settings.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 62 surrogate decision makers for critically ill patients were exposed to one of two healthcare decision support interventions were recruited from four intensive care units at a tertiary medical center in Northeast Ohio. Participants were administered a battery of psychosocial instruments and the eight-item cognitive load scale (CLS).

RESULTS

The CLS demonstrated a bidimensional factor structure with acceptable discriminant validity and internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.75 and 0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

The CLS is a psychometrically sound instrument that may be used in the evaluation of decision support among surrogate decision makers of the critically ill. The authors recommend application of the cognitive load scale in the evaluation and development of healthcare education and interventions.

摘要

目的

本文旨在报告八分量表认知负荷量表的心理测量特性。

背景

根据认知负荷理论,医疗保健教育的格式和传递方式会影响患者和/或家属为学习而调动工作记忆系统的程度。然而,尽管认知负荷具有相关性,但它尚未在接受电子医疗决策支持的替代决策制定者中进行评估。迄今为止,在医疗保健环境中尚未报告任何评估认知负荷的工具的心理测量学分析。

方法

从俄亥俄州东北部的一家三级医疗中心的四个重症监护病房中招募了 62 名重病患者的替代决策制定者的便利样本,他们接触到两种医疗保健决策支持干预措施之一。参与者接受了一系列社会心理工具和八分量表认知负荷量表(CLS)的评估。

结果

CLS 表现出二维因子结构,具有可接受的判别效度和内部一致性信度(Cronbach's α分别为 0.75 和 0.89)。

结论

CLS 是一种具有良好心理测量特性的工具,可用于评估危重患者替代决策制定者的决策支持。作者建议在医疗保健教育和干预措施的评估和开发中应用认知负荷量表。

相似文献

1
A preliminary psychometric evaluation of the eight-item cognitive load scale.八分量表认知负荷量表的初步心理计量学评估。
Appl Nurs Res. 2018 Apr;40:99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2018.01.006. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
2
Evaluation of the Decisional Fatigue Scale Among Surrogate Decision Makers of the Critically Ill.危重症患者替代决策者的决策疲劳量表评估
West J Nurs Res. 2018 Feb;40(2):191-208. doi: 10.1177/0193945917723828. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
3
A psychometric evaluation of the Family Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale among surrogate decision-makers of the critically ill.危重症患者代理人家庭决策自我效能感量表的心理测量学评估。
Palliat Support Care. 2020 Oct;18(5):537-543. doi: 10.1017/S1478951519000907.
4
Psychometric Properties for Multidimensional Cognitive Load Scale in an E-Learning Environment.多维认知负荷量表在电子学习环境中的心理测量特性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 10;19(10):5822. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19105822.
5
Comparing cognitive load levels among family members of the critically ill exposed to electronic decision aids.比较接触电子决策辅助工具的危重症患者家属的认知负荷水平。
Appl Nurs Res. 2019 Dec;50:151192. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2019.151192. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
6
Nurses' Empowerment Scale for ICU patients' families: an instrument development study.重症监护病房患者家属的护士赋权量表:一项工具开发研究。
Nurs Crit Care. 2016 Sep;21(5):e11-21. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12106. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
7
Structural Validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Among Family Members of Critically Ill Patients.危重症患者家属的医院焦虑和抑郁量表的结构效度。
Am J Crit Care. 2021 May 1;30(3):212-220. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2021214.
8
Elders Health Empowerment Scale: Spanish adaptation and psychometric analysis.老年人健康赋权量表:西班牙语改编及心理测量分析。
Colomb Med (Cali). 2014 Dec 30;45(4):179-85. eCollection 2014 Oct-Dec.
9
A new comprehensive diabetes health literacy scale: Development and psychometric evaluation.一个新的综合性糖尿病健康素养量表:编制与心理测量学评估。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Dec;88:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
10
Development of a social inclusion index to capture subjective and objective life domains (Phase II): psychometric development study.发展一个社会包容指数来捕捉主观和客观的生活领域(第二阶段):心理测量发展研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(1):iii-vii, ix-xii, -1-241. doi: 10.3310/hta16010.

引用本文的文献

1
A randomized comparison of two-stage versus traditional one-stage consent for a low-stakes randomized trial.一项低风险随机试验中两阶段与传统单阶段同意书的随机比较。
Clin Trials. 2023 Dec;20(6):642-648. doi: 10.1177/17407745231185058. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
2
Correlates of Cognitive Load in Surrogate Decision Makers of the Critically III.危重症患者替代决策者认知负荷的相关因素
West J Nurs Res. 2019 May;41(5):650-666. doi: 10.1177/0193945918807898. Epub 2018 Oct 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the Decisional Fatigue Scale Among Surrogate Decision Makers of the Critically Ill.危重症患者替代决策者的决策疲劳量表评估
West J Nurs Res. 2018 Feb;40(2):191-208. doi: 10.1177/0193945917723828. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
2
End-of-Life Decision Support in the ICU: Where Are We Now?重症监护病房中的临终决策支持:我们目前的状况如何?
West J Nurs Res. 2018 Jan;40(1):84-120. doi: 10.1177/0193945916676542. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
3
Measuring cognitive load during procedural skills training with colonoscopy as an exemplar.以结肠镜检查为例,在程序性技能培训期间测量认知负荷。
Med Educ. 2016 Jun;50(6):682-92. doi: 10.1111/medu.12965.
4
The evolution of cognitive load theory and its application to medical education.认知负荷理论的演变及其在医学教育中的应用。
Perspect Med Educ. 2015 Jun;4(3):119-27. doi: 10.1007/s40037-015-0192-x.
5
Innovative interventions to promote behavioral change in overweight or obese individuals: A review of the literature.促进超重或肥胖个体行为改变的创新干预措施:文献综述
Ann Med. 2015 May;47(3):179-85. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2014.931102. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
6
NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): validation of executive function measures in adults.美国国立卫生研究院工具箱认知电池(CB):成人执行功能测量的验证
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2014 Jul;20(6):620-9. doi: 10.1017/S1355617714000472. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
7
Patient and healthcare provider barriers to hypertension awareness, treatment and follow up: a systematic review and meta-analysis of qualitative and quantitative studies.患者及医疗服务提供者在高血压认知、治疗和随访方面的障碍:定性和定量研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 15;9(1):e84238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084238. eCollection 2014.
8
Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load.测量不同类型认知负荷的工具的开发。
Behav Res Methods. 2013 Dec;45(4):1058-72. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0334-1.
9
Computer-based diabetes self-management interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.针对2型糖尿病成年患者的基于计算机的糖尿病自我管理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD008776. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008776.pub2.
10
Pupillometry as a measure of cognitive effort in younger and older adults.瞳孔测量法在年轻和老年成年人认知努力中的应用。
Psychophysiology. 2010 May 1;47(3):560-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00947.x. Epub 2010 Jan 11.