• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

近期心肌梗死患者二级心血管事件 TIMI 风险评分的外部验证。

External validation of the TIMI risk score for secondary cardiovascular events among patients with recent myocardial infarction.

机构信息

Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

Atherosclerosis. 2018 May;272:80-86. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.03.026. Epub 2018 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.03.026
PMID:29579671
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Risk stratification of patients with recent myocardial infarction (MI) for subsequent cardiovascular (CV) events helps identify patients most likely to benefit from secondary prevention therapies. This study externally validated a new risk score (TRS2˚P) for secondary events derived from the TRA2°P-TIMI 50 trial among post-MI patients from two large health care systems.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 9618 patients treated for acute MI at either the Cleveland Clinic (CC) or Geisinger Health System (GHS) between 2008 and 2013. Patients with a clinic visit within 2-52 weeks of MI were included and followed for CV death, repeat MI, and ischemic stroke through electronic medical records (EMR). The TRS2˚P is based on nine factors determined through EMR documentation. Discrimination and calibration of the TRS2˚P were quantified in both patient populations.

RESULTS

MI patients at CC and GHS were older, had more comorbidities, received fewer medications, and had higher 3-year event rates compared to subjects in the TRA2°P trial: 31% (CC), 33% (GHS), and 10% (TRA2°P-TIMI 50). The proposed risk score had similar discrimination across the three cohorts with c-statistics of 0.66 (CC), 0.66 (GHS), and 0.67 (TRA2°P-TIMI 50). A strong graded relationship between the risk score and event rates was observed in all cohorts, though 3-year event rates were consistently higher within TRS2°P strata in the CC and GHS cohorts relative to TRA2˚P-TIMI 50.

CONCLUSIONS

The TRS2˚P demonstrated consistent risk discrimination across trial and non-trial patients with recent MI, but event rates were consistently higher in the non-trial cohorts.

摘要

背景与目的

对近期心肌梗死(MI)患者进行心血管(CV)事件的风险分层有助于确定最有可能从二级预防治疗中获益的患者。本研究在克利夫兰诊所(CC)和 Geisinger 健康系统(GHS)的两个大型医疗保健系统中,对来自 TRA2°P-TIMI 50 试验的近期 MI 患者进行了一项新的二级事件风险评分(TRS2˚P)的外部验证。

方法

本回顾性队列研究纳入了 2008 年至 2013 年间在 CC 或 GHS 接受急性 MI 治疗的 9618 例患者。纳入 MI 后 2-52 周内有门诊就诊记录的患者,并通过电子病历(EMR)随访 CV 死亡、再次 MI 和缺血性卒中。TRS2˚P 基于通过 EMR 记录确定的九个因素。在两个患者群体中均对 TRS2˚P 的区分度和校准度进行了量化。

结果

与 TRA2°P-TIMI 50 试验相比,CC 和 GHS 的 MI 患者年龄更大、合并症更多、接受的药物治疗更少,且 3 年事件发生率更高:31%(CC)、33%(GHS)和 10%(TRA2°P-TIMI 50)。该风险评分在三个队列中的区分度相似,C 统计量分别为 0.66(CC)、0.66(GHS)和 0.67(TRA2°P-TIMI 50)。在所有队列中均观察到风险评分与事件发生率之间呈强梯度关系,但在 CC 和 GHS 队列中,TRS2˚P 各分层的 3 年事件发生率始终高于 TRA2°P-TIMI 50。

结论

TRS2˚P 在近期 MI 的试验和非试验患者中均表现出一致的风险区分度,但非试验队列的事件发生率始终较高。

相似文献

1
External validation of the TIMI risk score for secondary cardiovascular events among patients with recent myocardial infarction.近期心肌梗死患者二级心血管事件 TIMI 风险评分的外部验证。
Atherosclerosis. 2018 May;272:80-86. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.03.026. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
2
International Validation of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Risk Score for Secondary Prevention in Post-MI Patients: A Collaborative Analysis of the Chronic Kidney Disease Prognosis Consortium and the Risk Validation Scientific Committee.国际验证心肌梗死后血栓溶解治疗(TIMI)风险评分在 MI 后患者二级预防中的应用:慢性肾脏病预后联盟和风险验证科学委员会的协作分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jul 7;7(14):e008426. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008426.
3
Atherothrombotic Risk Stratification and the Efficacy and Safety of Vorapaxar in Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease and Previous Myocardial Infarction.动脉粥样硬化血栓形成风险分层以及vorapaxar在稳定型缺血性心脏病和既往心肌梗死患者中的疗效与安全性
Circulation. 2016 Jul 26;134(4):304-13. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.019861.
4
Validation of the atherothrombotic risk score for secondary prevention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: the J-MINUET study.验证急性心肌梗死患者二级预防的动脉血栓形成风险评分:J-MINUET 研究。
Heart Vessels. 2021 Oct;36(10):1506-1513. doi: 10.1007/s00380-021-01840-z. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
5
Management and outcome across the spectrum of high-risk patients with myocardial infarction according to the thrmobolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) risk-score for secondary prevention.根据心肌梗死溶栓治疗(TIMI)风险评分对高危心肌梗死患者进行二级预防的管理和结局。
Clin Cardiol. 2021 Nov;44(11):1535-1542. doi: 10.1002/clc.23715. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
6
Outcomes in Stable Patients With Previous Atherothrombotic Events Receiving Vorapaxar Who Experience a New Acute Coronary Event (from TRA2°P-TIMI 50).既往有动脉粥样硬化血栓形成事件且接受vorapaxar治疗的稳定患者发生新的急性冠状动脉事件的结局(来自TRA2°P-TIMI 50研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Apr 1;117(7):1055-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.12.052. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
7
Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Risk Score for Secondary Prevention of Recurrent Cardiovascular Events in a Real-World Cohort of Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients.心肌梗死后溶栓风险评分在急性心肌梗死后真实世界队列患者中对复发性心血管事件的二级预防作用。
Circ J. 2019 Mar 25;83(4):809-817. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0308. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
8
Efficacy and safety of vorapaxar as approved for clinical use in the United States.美国批准临床使用的vorapaxar的疗效与安全性。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Mar 19;4(3):e001505. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001505.
9
Acute Limb Ischemia and Outcomes With Vorapaxar in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: Results From the Trial to Assess the Effects of Vorapaxar in Preventing Heart Attack and Stroke in Patients With Atherosclerosis-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 50 (TRA2°P-TIMI 50).外周动脉疾病患者中用沃拉帕沙治疗急性肢体缺血和结局:评估沃拉帕沙预防动脉粥样硬化血栓形成患者心肌梗死溶栓治疗 50 试验中(TRA2°P-TIMI 50)发生心脏病和中风的效果的试验。
Circulation. 2016 Mar 8;133(10):997-1005. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.019355. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
10
Vorapaxar in patients with diabetes mellitus and previous myocardial infarction: findings from the thrombin receptor antagonist in secondary prevention of atherothrombotic ischemic events-TIMI 50 trial.糖尿病合并既往心肌梗死患者使用vorapaxar:来自凝血酶受体拮抗剂在动脉粥样硬化血栓形成性缺血事件二级预防中的研究——TIMI 50试验的结果
Circulation. 2015 Mar 24;131(12):1047-53. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.013774. Epub 2015 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
TIMI Risk Score for Secondary Prevention to Risk Stratify Chronic Coronary Syndrome Patients: External Validation Study.用于慢性冠状动脉综合征患者风险分层的二级预防TIMI风险评分:外部验证研究
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2025 Apr;122(5):e20240821. doi: 10.36660/abc.20240821.
2
Risk Prediction Models for Ischemic Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征患者缺血性心血管事件的风险预测模型
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Apr 13;24(4):106. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2404106. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
Comparative characterization of inflammatory profile and oral microbiome according to an inflammation-based risk score in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
根据 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死炎症相关风险评分比较炎症特征和口腔微生物组。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Feb 13;13:1095380. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1095380. eCollection 2023.
4
Association of clinical trial participation after myocardial infarction with socioeconomic status, clinical characteristics, and outcomes.心肌梗死后参与临床试验与社会经济地位、临床特征及结局的关联
Eur Heart J Open. 2021 Aug 11;1(2):oeab020. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeab020. eCollection 2021 Sep.
5
Establishing a National Cardiovascular Disease Surveillance System in the United States Using Electronic Health Record Data: Key Strengths and Limitations.利用电子健康记录数据在美国建立国家心血管疾病监测系统:主要优势和局限性。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Apr 19;11(8):e024409. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024409. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
6
Management and outcomes over time of acute coronary syndrome patients at particularly high cardiovascular risk : the ACSIS registry-based retrospective study.特定高心血管风险的急性冠脉综合征患者的管理和长期预后:基于 ACSIS 注册的回顾性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 11;12(4):e060953. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060953.
7
Constructing Epidemiologic Cohorts from Electronic Health Record Data.从电子健康记录数据中构建流行病学队列。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 14;18(24):13193. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413193.
8
Cardiovascular Family History Increases the Risk of Disease Recurrence After a First Myocardial Infarction.心血管家族史会增加首次心肌梗死复发的风险。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Dec 7;10(23):e022264. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022264. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
9
Sequential Pattern Mining to Predict Medical In-Hospital Mortality from Administrative Data: Application to Acute Coronary Syndrome.基于序列模式挖掘的急性冠状动脉综合征患者住院病死率预测:来自行政医疗数据的应用
J Healthc Eng. 2021 May 25;2021:5531807. doi: 10.1155/2021/5531807. eCollection 2021.
10
The incremental value of angiographic features for predicting recurrent cardiovascular events: Insights from the Duke Databank for Cardiovascular Disease.血管造影特征对预测复发性心血管事件的增量价值:来自杜克心血管疾病数据库的见解。
Atherosclerosis. 2021 Mar;321:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.02.004. Epub 2021 Feb 8.