• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解通过体力活动回忆法估计能量消耗和体力活动时测量误差的性质。

Understanding the Nature of Measurement Error When Estimating Energy Expenditure and Physical Activity via Physical Activity Recall.

出版信息

J Phys Act Health. 2018 Jul 1;15(7):543-549. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2017-0089. Epub 2018 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1123/jpah.2017-0089
PMID:29580135
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey physical activity questionnaire (PAQ) is used to estimate activity energy expenditure (AEE) and moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Bias and variance in estimates of AEE and MVPA from the PAQ have not been described, nor the impact of measurement error when utilizing the PAQ to predict biomarkers and categorize individuals.

METHODS

The PAQ was administered to 385 adults to estimate AEE (AEE:PAQ) and MVPA (MVPA:PAQ), while simultaneously measuring AEE with doubly labeled water (DLW; AEE:DLW) and MVPA with an accelerometer (MVPA:A).

RESULTS

Although AEE:PAQ [3.4 (2.2) MJ·d] was not significantly different from AEE:DLW [3.6 (1.6) MJ·d; P > .14], MVPA:PAQ [36.2 (24.4) min·d] was significantly higher than MVPA:A [8.0 (10.4) min·d; P < .0001]. AEE:PAQ regressed on AEE:DLW and MVPA:PAQ regressed on MVPA:A yielded not only significant positive relationships but also large residual variances. The relationships between AEE and MVPA, and 10 of the 12 biomarkers were underestimated by the PAQ. When compared with accelerometers, the PAQ overestimated the number of participants who met the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans.

CONCLUSIONS

Group-level bias in AEE:PAQ was small, but large for MVPA:PAQ. Poor within-participant estimates of AEE:PAQ and MVPA:PAQ lead to attenuated relationships with biomarkers and misclassifications of participants who met or who did not meet the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans.

摘要

背景

国家健康和营养检查调查体力活动问卷(PAQ)用于估计活动能量消耗(AEE)和中等到剧烈体力活动(MVPA)。尚未描述 PAQ 估计 AEE 和 MVPA 的偏差和方差,也未描述利用 PAQ 预测生物标志物和对个体进行分类时测量误差的影响。

方法

向 385 名成年人发放 PAQ,以估计 AEE(AEE:PAQ)和 MVPA(MVPA:PAQ),同时使用双标记水(DLW;AEE:DLW)测量 AEE,使用加速度计测量 MVPA(MVPA:A)。

结果

尽管 AEE:PAQ[3.4(2.2)MJ·d]与 AEE:DLW[3.6(1.6)MJ·d]无显著差异(P>0.14),但 MVPA:PAQ[36.2(24.4)min·d]明显高于 MVPA:A[8.0(10.4)min·d;P<0.0001]。AEE:PAQ 回归 AEE:DLW 和 MVPA:PAQ 回归 MVPA:A 不仅产生了显著的正相关关系,而且还产生了较大的剩余方差。AEE 和 MVPA 之间的关系以及 12 个生物标志物中的 10 个均被 PAQ 低估。与加速度计相比,PAQ 高估了符合《美国人体育活动指南》的参与者人数。

结论

AEE:PAQ 的组间偏差较小,但 MVPA:PAQ 的偏差较大。AEE:PAQ 和 MVPA:PAQ 的个体估计值较差,导致与生物标志物的关系减弱,并对符合或不符合《美国人体育活动指南》的参与者进行错误分类。

相似文献

1
Understanding the Nature of Measurement Error When Estimating Energy Expenditure and Physical Activity via Physical Activity Recall.理解通过体力活动回忆法估计能量消耗和体力活动时测量误差的性质。
J Phys Act Health. 2018 Jul 1;15(7):543-549. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2017-0089. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
2
Estimating activity energy expenditure: how valid are physical activity questionnaires?估算活动能量消耗:体力活动问卷的有效性如何?
Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Feb;87(2):279-91. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/87.2.279.
3
Comparison of total and activity energy expenditure estimates from physical activity questionnaires and doubly labelled water: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较体力活动问卷和双标水法估计的总能量和活性能量消耗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Nutr. 2021 May 14;125(9):983-997. doi: 10.1017/S0007114520003049. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
4
Simultaneous Validation of Seven Physical Activity Questionnaires Used in Japanese Cohorts for Estimating Energy Expenditure: A Doubly Labeled Water Study.同时验证七种用于估算能量消耗的日本队列体力活动问卷:双标记水研究。
J Epidemiol. 2018 Oct 5;28(10):437-442. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20170129. Epub 2018 Apr 28.
5
Estimating energy expenditure from wrist and thigh accelerometry in free-living adults: a doubly labelled water study.利用腕部和大腿加速度计估算自由生活成年人的能量消耗:双标记水研究。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2019 Nov;43(11):2333-2342. doi: 10.1038/s41366-019-0352-x. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
6
Prediction of activity-related energy expenditure using accelerometer-derived physical activity under free-living conditions: a systematic review.在自由生活条件下使用加速度计测量的身体活动预测与活动相关的能量消耗:一项系统综述。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2016 Aug;40(8):1187-97. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2016.14. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
7
Criterion validity of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Schoolchildren (PAQ-S) in assessing physical activity levels: the Healthy Growth Study.《儿童身体活动问卷》(PAQ-S)评估身体活动水平的效标效度:健康成长研究
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2013 Oct;53(5):502-8.
8
Physical Activity Assessment with the ActiGraph GT3X and Doubly Labeled Water.使用ActiGraph GT3X和双标水进行身体活动评估。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Sep;49(9):1935-1944. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001299.
9
Validity of combining heart rate and uniaxial acceleration to measure free-living physical activity energy expenditure in young men.心率和单轴加速度相结合测量年轻男性自由活动体力活动能量消耗的有效性。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012 Dec 1;113(11):1763-71. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01413.2011. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
10
Validity and Relative Validity of Alternative Methods of Assessing Physical Activity in Epidemiologic Studies: Findings From the Men's Lifestyle Validation Study.在流行病学研究中评估身体活动的替代方法的有效性和相对有效性:来自男性生活方式验证研究的结果。
Am J Epidemiol. 2022 Jun 27;191(7):1307-1322. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac051.

引用本文的文献

1
Co-occurrences of fall-related factors in adults aged 60 to 85 years in the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.美国国家健康和营养检查调查中 60 至 85 岁成年人与跌倒相关因素的共同发生情况。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 8;17(11):e0277406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277406. eCollection 2022.
2
Physical Activity as a Predictor of Clinical Trial Outcomes in Bipolar Depression: A Subanalysis of a Mitochondrial-Enhancing Nutraceutical Randomized Controlled Trial.体力活动对双相抑郁临床试验结局的预测作用:一项线粒体增强型营养补充随机对照试验的亚分析。
Can J Psychiatry. 2020 May;65(5):306-318. doi: 10.1177/0706743719889547. Epub 2019 Nov 28.