Suppr超能文献

局部晚期鼻咽癌放疗前与放疗中给予抗 EGFR 靶向治疗的对比:基于大数据、智能化平台的分析。

Anti-EGFR targeted therapy delivered before versus during radiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a big-data, intelligence platform-based analysis.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.

Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2018 Mar 27;18(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4268-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the prognostic difference of anti-EGFR therapy, cetuximab (CTX) or nimotuzumab (NTZ), concurrently with induction chemotherapy (IC, investigational arm) or RT (control arm) for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC). We conducted this retrospective study to address this.

METHODS

We identified 296 patients with newly diagnosed LA-NPC at Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center between January 2012 and May 2015. Patients were treated by IC with CCRT or RT and CTX/NTZ was delivered during IC or radiotherapy. Survival outcomes and toxicities between different arms were compared.

RESULTS

In total, there were 149 patients in the investigational arm and 147 in control arm. The 3-year disease-free survival, overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival and locoregional relapse-free survival rates for investigational arm vs. control arm were 84.3% vs. 74.3% (P = 0.027), 94.0% vs. 92.1% (P = 0.673), 88.0% vs. 81.8% (P = 0.147) and 93.3% vs. 88.0% (P = 0.093). Multivariate analysis revealed patients in the control arm achieved significantly worse disease-free survival (HR, 1.497; 95% CI, 1.016-2.206; P = 0.026) compared with those in the investigational arm; however, no significant difference was identified for other endpoints. Patients in the investigational arm experienced more grade 3-4 skin reaction (15.4% vs. 2.0%, P <  0.001) and mucositis (10.1% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.022) during induction phase, but less skin reaction (5.4% vs. 25.9%, P <  0.001) and mucositis (24.8% vs. 36.7%, P = 0.026) during RT.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggested that CTX/NTZ concurrently with IC may be a more effective and promising strategy for patients with LA-NPC receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

摘要

背景

对于局部晚期鼻咽癌(LA-NPC)患者,同时接受诱导化疗(IC,研究组)或放疗(对照组)联合抗 EGFR 治疗(西妥昔单抗[CTX]或尼妥珠单抗[NTZ])的预后差异知之甚少。我们进行了这项回顾性研究来解决这个问题。

方法

我们在中山大学肿瘤防治中心(2012 年 1 月至 2015 年 5 月)确定了 296 名新诊断为 LA-NPC 的患者。患者接受 IC 联合 CCRT 或 RT 治疗,在 IC 或放疗期间给予 CTX/NTZ。比较不同组之间的生存结果和毒性。

结果

共有 149 名患者在研究组,147 名患者在对照组。研究组和对照组的 3 年无疾病生存率、总生存率、无远处转移生存率和无局部区域复发生存率分别为 84.3% vs. 74.3%(P=0.027)、94.0% vs. 92.1%(P=0.673)、88.0% vs. 81.8%(P=0.147)和 93.3% vs. 88.0%(P=0.093)。多变量分析显示,与研究组相比,对照组患者的无疾病生存率显著更差(HR,1.497;95%CI,1.016-2.206;P=0.026);然而,其他终点没有显著差异。研究组患者在诱导期出现更多的 3-4 级皮肤反应(15.4% vs. 2.0%,P<0.001)和粘膜炎(10.1% vs. 3.4%,P=0.022),但在放疗期间皮肤反应(5.4% vs. 25.9%,P<0.001)和粘膜炎(24.8% vs. 36.7%,P=0.026)较少。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,CTX/NTZ 联合 IC 可能是接受调强放疗的 LA-NPC 患者更有效和更有前途的策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34d8/5870169/f55f9b5b04e4/12885_2018_4268_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验