Department of Interventional and Diagnostic Radiology, University of Washington Medical Center, Health Sciences Building, RR210, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 357115, Seattle, WA, 98195-7115, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arizona, 1609 N. Warren Ave, Suite 110, Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA.
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Mar 27;18(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1157-7.
Deficiencies in medical student knowledge in musculoskeletal medicine have been well documented. To address these deficiencies, numerous curricular changes at our institution were instituted. The objective of this study was to determine whether medical students in their preclinical years benefit from early exposure to musculoskeletal medicine when compared to students exposed to musculoskeletal medicine just prior to completion of their preclinical curriculum.
United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 and 2 scores were compared for periods of time before and after institution of the new curriculum. Scores on the previously validated 24-question short answer survey from Freedman and Bernstein were also compared over these same periods of time between these two groups and to established standards for competency, using a student's two-tailed unpaired t-test for significance. Entering Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) scores were used to compare baseline preparation of students.
Overall USMLE scores as well as scores on the USMLE subtest on Musculoskeletal, Skin and Connective Tissue Disease showed no improvement when scores were compared between the two groups of students. There was a statistically significant lower performance on the Freedman and Bernstein knowledge assessment exam for students in the new pre-clinical curriculum as compared to those introduced under the old model, considering both musculoskeletal knowledge (p < 0.001) and proficiency (p < 0.01), though the response rate on the recent survey was low (112/986 or 11%). Spine remained the least understood sub-topic, while a dedicated course in rheumatology likely contributed to increased student knowledge in that area. Additional exposure to musculoskeletal topics during the clinical years increased student knowledge. There was no difference between groups when comparing entering MCAT scores.
Classroom curricular changes, including moving the introductory musculoskeletal course to the first year, intended to optimize musculoskeletal medicine education in the pre-clinical years of medical school did not appear to improve student musculoskeletal knowledge at any year of training. Further efforts to improve the education of medical students in musculoskeletal medicine should be directed towards providing more clinical experiences with patients having musculoskeletal concerns. This was a retrospective comparative study, level III evidence.
医学生在肌肉骨骼医学方面的知识不足已得到充分证明。为了解决这些不足,我们机构进行了许多课程改革。本研究的目的是确定在临床前阶段,与仅在临床前课程结束前接触肌肉骨骼医学的学生相比,早期接触肌肉骨骼医学是否对医学生有益。
比较新课程实施前后的美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第 1 步和第 2 步的分数。还比较了 Freedman 和 Bernstein 之前验证的 24 个问题的简短答案调查的分数,这些分数在同一时间段内,在这两组学生之间以及使用学生的双侧非配对 t 检验来确定与既定能力标准的差异。入学医学院入学考试(MCAT)分数用于比较学生的基线准备情况。
整体 USMLE 分数以及肌肉骨骼、皮肤和结缔组织疾病 USMLE 子测试的分数,在比较两组学生的分数时都没有提高。与旧模式相比,新的临床前课程的学生在 Freedman 和 Bernstein 知识评估考试中的表现明显较低,无论是肌肉骨骼知识(p < 0.001)还是熟练程度(p < 0.01),尽管最近的调查响应率较低(112/986 或 11%)。脊柱仍然是最不被理解的子主题,而风湿病的专门课程可能有助于增加学生在该领域的知识。在临床学年中增加对肌肉骨骼主题的接触增加了学生的知识。比较入学 MCAT 分数时,两组之间没有差异。
课堂课程改革,包括将介绍性的肌肉骨骼课程移至第一年,旨在优化医学院临床前阶段的肌肉骨骼医学教育,但似乎并没有提高学生在任何培训年的肌肉骨骼知识。进一步努力改善医学生在肌肉骨骼医学方面的教育,应该致力于提供更多与有肌肉骨骼问题的患者的临床经验。这是一项回顾性比较研究,证据等级 III。