LeBlanc Nicole L, Scollan Katherine F
Am J Vet Res. 2018 Apr;79(4):404-410. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.79.4.404.
OBJECTIVE To evaluate accuracy of quantification of right ventricle volume (RVV) by use of 3-D echocardiography (3DE) and ECG-gated multidetector CT (MDCT). ANIMALS 6 healthy hound-cross dogs. PROCEDURES ECG-gated MDCT and complete 3DE examinations were performed on each dog. Right ventricular end-diastolic volumes (EDVs), end-systolic volumes (ESVs), stroke volume (SV), and ejection fraction (EF) were measured for 3DE and MDCT data sets by use of software specific for RVV quantification. Correlation and level of agreement between methods were determined. Intraobserver and interobserver variability were assessed for 3DE. RESULTS No significant differences were detected between SV and EF obtained with MDCT and 3DE. Significant differences were detected between right ventricular EDV and ESV obtained with MDCT and 3DE. No significant difference in heart rate was detected between methods. The correlation between MDCT and 3DE was very good (r = 0.87) for EDV and ESV, moderate (r = 0.60) for EF, and poor (r = 0.31) for SV. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a systematic underestimation of RVV derived by use of 3DE, compared with the RVV derived by use of MDCT (mean bias, 15 and 10.3 mL for EDV and ESV, respectively). Intraobserver (EDV, 12%; ESV, 18%) and interobserver (EDV, 14%; ESV, 11%) variability were acceptable for 3DE. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE There was substantial variance for RVV measured by use of 3DE in healthy dogs and a significant underestimation of volumes, compared with results for MDCT, despite the fact there were no significant differences in SV and EF.
目的 评估使用三维超声心动图(3DE)和心电图门控多层螺旋CT(MDCT)定量测定右心室容积(RVV)的准确性。 动物 6只健康的杂种猎犬。 方法 对每只犬进行心电图门控MDCT和完整的3DE检查。使用专门用于RVV定量的软件,对3DE和MDCT数据集测量右心室舒张末期容积(EDV)、收缩末期容积(ESV)、每搏输出量(SV)和射血分数(EF)。确定两种方法之间的相关性和一致性水平。评估3DE的观察者内和观察者间变异性。 结果 MDCT和3DE测得的SV和EF之间未检测到显著差异。MDCT和3DE测得的右心室EDV和ESV之间检测到显著差异。两种方法之间的心率未检测到显著差异。MDCT和3DE之间EDV和ESV的相关性非常好(r = 0.87),EF的相关性中等(r = 0.60),SV的相关性较差(r = 0.31)。Bland-Altman分析显示,与MDCT得出的RVV相比,使用3DE得出的RVV存在系统性低估(EDV和ESV的平均偏差分别为15和10.3 mL)。3DE的观察者内(EDV为12%;ESV为18%)和观察者间(EDV为14%;ESV为11%)变异性是可接受的。 结论及临床意义 在健康犬中,使用3DE测量RVV存在很大差异,与MDCT结果相比,容积有显著低估,尽管SV和EF没有显著差异。