Suppr超能文献

一项关于配子输卵管内移植(GIFT)与体外受精和胚胎移植在特发性和男性不育治疗中应用的对照研究。

A controlled study between the use of gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT) and in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in the management of idiopathic and male infertility.

作者信息

Leeton J, Rogers P, Caro C, Healy D, Yates C

机构信息

Monash-Epworth In Vitro Fertilization Centre, Epworth Medical Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 1987 Oct;48(4):605-7. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59471-0.

Abstract

A randomized controlled trial comparing the use-effectiveness between gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT) and in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer (ET) procedures showed no significant difference in pregnancy rates in the management of patients presenting with idiopathic or male infertility. The cost-effectiveness of GIFT appears superior to IVF and ET with laparoscopic oocyte collection, but comparable to IVF-ET with ultrasonic oocyte collection. The lack of data on the fertilizing capacity of sperm in GIFT procedures in cases of male infertility is a real disadvantage and currently precludes the management of severe male infertility with this method.

摘要

一项比较配子输卵管内移植(GIFT)与体外受精(IVF)及胚胎移植(ET)程序使用效果的随机对照试验表明,在治疗特发性或男性不育患者时,妊娠率无显著差异。GIFT的成本效益在腹腔镜取卵时似乎优于IVF和ET,但与超声取卵的IVF-ET相当。在男性不育病例的GIFT程序中,缺乏关于精子受精能力的数据是一个实际缺点,目前妨碍了用这种方法治疗严重男性不育。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验