Suppr超能文献

一项关于配子输卵管内移植(GIFT)与体外受精和胚胎移植在特发性和男性不育治疗中应用的对照研究。

A controlled study between the use of gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT) and in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in the management of idiopathic and male infertility.

作者信息

Leeton J, Rogers P, Caro C, Healy D, Yates C

机构信息

Monash-Epworth In Vitro Fertilization Centre, Epworth Medical Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 1987 Oct;48(4):605-7. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59471-0.

Abstract

A randomized controlled trial comparing the use-effectiveness between gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT) and in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer (ET) procedures showed no significant difference in pregnancy rates in the management of patients presenting with idiopathic or male infertility. The cost-effectiveness of GIFT appears superior to IVF and ET with laparoscopic oocyte collection, but comparable to IVF-ET with ultrasonic oocyte collection. The lack of data on the fertilizing capacity of sperm in GIFT procedures in cases of male infertility is a real disadvantage and currently precludes the management of severe male infertility with this method.

摘要

一项比较配子输卵管内移植(GIFT)与体外受精(IVF)及胚胎移植(ET)程序使用效果的随机对照试验表明,在治疗特发性或男性不育患者时,妊娠率无显著差异。GIFT的成本效益在腹腔镜取卵时似乎优于IVF和ET,但与超声取卵的IVF-ET相当。在男性不育病例的GIFT程序中,缺乏关于精子受精能力的数据是一个实际缺点,目前妨碍了用这种方法治疗严重男性不育。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验