Leeton J, Rogers P, Caro C, Healy D, Yates C
Monash-Epworth In Vitro Fertilization Centre, Epworth Medical Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Fertil Steril. 1987 Oct;48(4):605-7. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59471-0.
A randomized controlled trial comparing the use-effectiveness between gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT) and in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer (ET) procedures showed no significant difference in pregnancy rates in the management of patients presenting with idiopathic or male infertility. The cost-effectiveness of GIFT appears superior to IVF and ET with laparoscopic oocyte collection, but comparable to IVF-ET with ultrasonic oocyte collection. The lack of data on the fertilizing capacity of sperm in GIFT procedures in cases of male infertility is a real disadvantage and currently precludes the management of severe male infertility with this method.
一项比较配子输卵管内移植(GIFT)与体外受精(IVF)及胚胎移植(ET)程序使用效果的随机对照试验表明,在治疗特发性或男性不育患者时,妊娠率无显著差异。GIFT的成本效益在腹腔镜取卵时似乎优于IVF和ET,但与超声取卵的IVF-ET相当。在男性不育病例的GIFT程序中,缺乏关于精子受精能力的数据是一个实际缺点,目前妨碍了用这种方法治疗严重男性不育。