Jolicoeur P, Besner D
Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1987 Aug;13(3):478-87. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.13.3.478.
In Experiment 1, subjects made same-different judgments to pairs of shapes that could differ (irrelevantly) in size and in which different pairs combined distinct shapes. Size discrepancy had an effect both on same and different responses. However, the effect on different responses was not monotonic across size discrepancies. It is argued that this nonmonotonicity was produced by a form of bias acting to slow different responses for same-sized pairs. Consistent with the proposed bias account, the nonmonotonic size-discrepancy effect on different trials was eliminated in Experiment 2, in which trials were blocked by size ratio. In Experiment 3, subjects performed a task similar to that in Experiments 1 and 2. However, additional visual information was added inside the bounding contour of the shapes, and this information was either the same or different across shapes. The match between within-contour information across shapes (whether same or different) was varied orthogonally with whether the bounding contours of the shapes were the same or different. In this experiment subjects decided whether the bounding contours of the shapes were the same or different, while ignoring the added information within the contours. When the added information matched across the two shapes, same responses were facilitated relative to when the added information mismatched. The converse occurred for different responses. This effect was more pronounced when the shapes were shown at the same size than when the shapes were at different sizes. In general, the results suggest that (a) size discrepancy affects some perceptual operations that are preliminary to shape matching, and (b) bias mechanisms can play an important role in shape-matching experiments in which the shapes can be shown in different sizes. The interaction of two processes--size scaling and bias--can account for these and hitherto contradictory results in the literature.
在实验1中,受试者对可能在大小上(无关地)存在差异且不同对组合了不同形状的形状对进行相同-不同判断。大小差异对相同和不同反应均有影响。然而,对不同反应的影响在大小差异上并非单调的。有人认为,这种非单调性是由一种偏差形式产生的,该偏差作用于减缓相同大小形状对的不同反应。与所提出的偏差解释一致,在实验2中消除了不同试验中大小差异的非单调效应,在实验2中试验按大小比例进行分组。在实验3中,受试者执行了与实验1和2中类似的任务。然而,在形状的边界轮廓内添加了额外的视觉信息,并且此信息在不同形状之间要么相同要么不同。形状之间轮廓内信息的匹配(无论相同还是不同)与形状的边界轮廓是否相同或不同相互正交变化。在这个实验中,受试者判断形状的边界轮廓是否相同,同时忽略轮廓内添加的信息。当两个形状之间添加的信息匹配时,相对于添加的信息不匹配时,相同反应得到促进。不同反应则相反。当形状以相同大小呈现时,这种效应比形状以不同大小呈现时更明显。总体而言,结果表明:(a)大小差异会影响形状匹配之前的一些感知操作,(b)偏差机制在形状匹配实验中可以发挥重要作用,在这些实验中形状可以以不同大小呈现。大小缩放和偏差这两个过程的相互作用可以解释这些以及文献中迄今相互矛盾的结果。