Torstensson Thomas, Butler Stephen, Lindgren Anne, Peterson Magnus, Nilsson-Wikmar Lena, Eriksson Margaretha, Kristiansson Per
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Box 564, 751 22, Uppsala, SE, Sweden.
Departmemt of Physiotherapy, Sundsvall Hospital, 851 86, Sundsvall, SE, Sweden.
BMC Womens Health. 2018 Mar 27;18(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0542-z.
Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) affects 15-24% of women and can have a devastating impact on quality of life. Laparoscopy is often used in the investigation, although in one third of the examinations there is no visible pathology and the women may be dismissed without further investigation. Also, the contribution of skeletal, muscular, periosteal and ligamentous tissues to CPP remains to be further elucidated. The objective of the present study was to compare pain intensity provoked from anatomical landmarks of the intra-pelvic side-wall in women with pregnancy-related CPP after childbirth and women without such pain.
This is a descriptive study of 36 non-randomly selected parous women with CPP after childbirth and 29 likewise selected parous women after childbirth without CPP. Pain was determined by questionnaire and clinical examination. The primary outcome measure was reported pain intensity provoked on 13 anatomical landmarks of the intra-pelvic side-wall. All women reported their perceived pain intensity for each anatomical landmark on Likert scales and an individual sum score was calculated.
Women with chronic pelvic pain were older than women without CPP. At several intra-pelvic landmarks high intensity pain was provoked in women with CPP compared with less intense pain provoked at fewer landmarks in women without low back or pelvic pain (p < 0.0001). The average sum of pain intensity scores was about 4 times higher in women with CPP (1.3) as compared with those without low back or pelvic pain (0.3), p < 0.0001. This association remained when adjusting for the age difference between the pain groups in linear regression analysis. In addition, reported pain intensity at worst past week was independently associated with sum of pain intensity scores. The maximum individual sum of pain intensity scores among women without CPP was exceeded by that of 85% of the women with CPP.
Parous women with CPP after childbirth had a heightened pain intensity over 13 anatomical landmarks during pelvic examination compared with parous women without CPP. These results need to be confirmed in a larger cohort with different types of CPP.
慢性盆腔疼痛(CPP)影响15%至24%的女性,对生活质量有严重影响。腹腔镜检查常用于该病症的诊断,然而在三分之一的检查中未发现明显病变,这些女性可能未得到进一步检查就被排除。此外,骨骼、肌肉、骨膜和韧带组织对CPP的影响仍有待进一步阐明。本研究的目的是比较产后患有与妊娠相关CPP的女性和无此类疼痛的女性,从盆腔侧壁解剖标志引发的疼痛强度。
这是一项描述性研究,选取36名非随机选择的产后患有CPP的经产妇女和29名同样选取的产后无CPP的经产妇女。通过问卷调查和临床检查确定疼痛情况。主要结局指标是报告从盆腔侧壁13个解剖标志引发的疼痛强度。所有女性用李克特量表报告每个解剖标志的疼痛强度感知,并计算个人总分。
患有慢性盆腔疼痛的女性比无CPP的女性年龄更大。与无下背部或盆腔疼痛的女性相比,患有CPP的女性在多个盆腔内标志处引发高强度疼痛,而在较少标志处引发的疼痛强度较低(p<0.0001)。患有CPP的女性疼痛强度评分的平均总分(1.3)约为无下背部或盆腔疼痛女性(0.3)的4倍,p<0.0001。在线性回归分析中调整疼痛组之间的年龄差异后,这种关联仍然存在。此外,过去一周最严重时报告的疼痛强度与疼痛强度评分总和独立相关。无CPP女性中疼痛强度评分的最大个人总分超过了85%的患有CPP的女性。
与无CPP的经产妇女相比,产后患有CPP的经产妇女在盆腔检查期间,在13个解剖标志处的疼痛强度更高。这些结果需要在更大的、包含不同类型CPP的队列中得到证实。