MEDCIDS - Departamento de Medicina da Comunidade, Informação e Decisão em Saúde, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Rua Dr. Plácido da Costa, s/n, 4200 - 450, Porto, Portugal.
CINTESIS - Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Mar 27;18(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1162-x.
Internal grade inflation is a documented practice in secondary schools (mostly in private schools) that jeopardises fairness with regard to access to medical school. However, it is frequently assumed that the higher internal grades are in fact justifiable, as they correspond to better preparation of students in private schools in areas that national exams do not cover but nevertheless are important. Consequently, it is expected that students from private schools will succeed better in medical school than their colleagues, or at least not perform worse. We aimed to study whether students from private schools do fare better in medical school than their colleagues from public schools, even after adjusting for internal grade inflation.
We analysed all students that entered into a medical course from 2007 to 2014. A linear regression was performed using mean grades for the 1st-year curse units (CU) of the medical school curriculum as a dependent variable and student gender, the nature of students' secondary school (public/private), and whether their secondary school highly inflated grades as independent variables. A logistic regression was also performed, modelling whether or not students failed at least one CU exam during the 1st year of medical school as a function of the aforementioned independent variables.
Of the 1709 students analysed, 55% came from public secondary schools. Private (vs. public) secondary school (β = - 0.459, p < 0.001) and whether secondary schools highly inflated grades (β = - 0.246, p = 0.003) were independent factors that significantly influenced grades during the first year of medical school. Having attended a private secondary school also significantly increased the odds of a student having failed at least one CU exam during the 1st year of medical school (OR = 1.33), even after adjusting for whether or not the secondary school used highly inflated grades.
It is important to further discuss what we can learn from the fact that students from public secondary schools seem to be better prepared for medical school teaching methodologies than their colleagues from private ones and the implications for the selection process.
中学(主要是私立学校)内部成绩膨胀是有记录的做法,这危及到医学院入学机会的公平性。然而,人们常常认为,私立学校的较高内部成绩实际上是合理的,因为它们对应于私立学校在国家考试未涵盖但仍然很重要的领域对学生进行了更好的准备。因此,预计私立学校的学生在医学院的表现会优于他们的同事,或者至少不会表现更差。我们旨在研究即使在考虑到内部成绩膨胀的情况下,私立学校的学生是否在医学院的表现确实优于他们的公立学校同事。
我们分析了所有在 2007 年至 2014 年期间进入医学院的学生。使用线性回归,将医学课程第一学年的课程单元(CU)的平均成绩作为因变量,学生性别、学生中学的性质(公立/私立)以及他们的中学是否高度膨胀成绩作为自变量。还进行了逻辑回归,将至少有一个 CU 考试不及格的学生在第一年的医学学校中建模为上述自变量的函数。
在所分析的 1709 名学生中,55%来自公立中学。私立(与公立相比)中学(β=-0.459,p<0.001)和中学是否高度膨胀成绩(β=-0.246,p=0.003)是独立因素,对医学第一学年的成绩有显著影响。上私立中学也显著增加了学生在第一年的医学学校中至少有一个 CU 考试不及格的几率(OR=1.33),即使调整了中学是否使用高度膨胀的成绩。
重要的是,我们需要进一步讨论从公立中学的学生似乎比私立中学的同事为医学院的教学方法做好了更好的准备这一事实中我们可以学到什么,以及这对选拔过程的影响。