Suppr超能文献

在有限的视频脑电图监测期间,于预监测入院时有效停用抗癫痫药物以捕捉癫痫发作。

Effective withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs in premonitoring admission to capture seizures during limited video-EEG monitoring.

作者信息

Kagawa Kota, Iida Koji, Baba Shiro, Hashizume Akira, Katagiri Masaya, Kurisu Kaoru, Otsubo Hiroshi

机构信息

Division of Neurology Department of Pediatrics The Hospital for Sick Children Toronto Ontario Canada.

Department of Neurosurgery Hiroshima University Hospital Hiroshima Japan.

出版信息

Epilepsia Open. 2017 Mar 2;2(2):172-179. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12047. eCollection 2017 Jun.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is commonly applied to capture seizures in video-EEG (vEEG) monitoring for patients with infrequent but intractable seizures. Because of the half-life of AEDs, AED withdrawal during only vEEG tends to be inadequate to provoke seizures within the vEEG admission. We hypothesize that prewithdrawal of long-half-life AEDs in premonitoring admission (PMA) is safe and effective to capture seizures in the limited time of vEEG. We determined the effect of half-life on the interval between AED withdrawal and seizure occurrence.

METHODS

We collected 87 patients with three criteria: (1) seizure occurrence ≤3 per month; (2) AEDs ≥2; (3) AED withdrawal during their admission, among 126 consecutive patients who underwent vEEG in the Department of Neurosurgery, Hiroshima University Hospital between 2011 and 2014. We divided patients into two groups on the basis of half-life of AED: Group A (23 patients) with phenobarbital (PB) and/or zonisamide (ZNS); Group B (64 patients) with other AEDs. In Group A, PB and ZNS were withdrawn during 4-day PMA before vEEG started. Further AED withdrawal was performed during vEEG, depending on the seizure occurrence.

RESULTS

The number of AEDs on admission was significantly higher in Group A (2-6, 3.5 ± 0.9; range, mean ±SD) than in Group B (2-5, 2.8 ± 0.8) (p < 0.01). All 23 Group A patients and 13 (20%) Group B patients underwent AED withdrawal during PMA. Seizures occurred during PMA in two patients in both Group A (9%) and Group B (15%). The first seizure occurred significantly longer after the start of withdrawal in Group A (6.1 ± 2.0 days) than in Group B (2.8 ± 1.3 days) (p < 0.01). Seizures were equally captured between both groups: 96% in Group A and 92% in Group B during vEEG.

SIGNIFICANCE

For epilepsy patients who are treated with PB and/or ZNS, we recommend the planning of AED withdrawal during PMA before the start of vEEG to succeed in capturing seizures during the limited time of vEEG monitoring.

摘要

目的

撤停抗癫痫药物(AEDs)常用于视频脑电图(vEEG)监测中捕捉发作,适用于发作不频繁但难以控制的癫痫患者。由于AEDs的半衰期,仅在vEEG监测期间撤停AEDs往往不足以在vEEG监测期内诱发发作。我们假设在监测前入院(PMA)时提前撤停半衰期长的AEDs对于在有限的vEEG时间内捕捉发作是安全有效的。我们确定了半衰期对AED撤停至发作出现间隔时间的影响。

方法

我们从2011年至2014年在广岛大学医院神经外科接受vEEG监测的126例连续患者中收集了87例符合以下三个标准的患者:(1)每月发作次数≤3次;(2)使用≥2种AEDs;(3)住院期间撤停AEDs。我们根据AEDs的半衰期将患者分为两组:A组(23例患者)使用苯巴比妥(PB)和/或唑尼沙胺(ZNS);B组(64例患者)使用其他AEDs。在A组中,在vEEG开始前的4天PMA期间撤停PB和ZNS。在vEEG期间,根据发作情况进一步撤停AEDs。

结果

A组入院时使用的AEDs数量(2 - 6种,3.5±0.9;范围,均值±标准差)显著高于B组(2 - 5种,2.8±0.8)(p<0.01)。A组的所有23例患者和B组的13例(20%)患者在PMA期间撤停了AEDs。A组和B组均有2例患者(分别为9%和15%)在PMA期间出现发作。A组撤停开始后至首次发作的时间(6.1±2.0天)显著长于B组(2.8±1.3天)(p<0.01)。两组在vEEG期间捕捉到发作的比例相当:A组为96%,B组为92%。

意义

对于使用PB和/或ZNS治疗的癫痫患者,我们建议在vEEG开始前的PMA期间规划AED撤停,以便在有限的vEEG监测时间内成功捕捉发作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2149/5719858/de9c8584a607/EPI4-2-172-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验