Bainbridge Jacquelyn, De Backer Marc, Eckhardt Klaus, Tennigkeit Frank, Bongardt Sabine, Sen David, Werhahn Konrad J, Shaibani Aziz, Faught Edward
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Aurora Colorado U.S.A.
UCB Pharma Brussels Belgium.
Epilepsia Open. 2017 Sep 11;2(4):415-423. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12079. eCollection 2017 Dec.
To assess the safety profile of lacosamide monotherapy in elderly (≥65 years) subjects with diabetic neuropathic pain (DNP).
Of 1,863 DNP subjects in double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of lacosamide monotherapy (NCT00861445, NCT00235469, NCT00238524, NCT00135109, NCT00350103), 502 were elderly. Safety data from elderly subjects were compared with that of younger subjects (<65 years) within these DNP trials. It should be noted that lacosamide is approved for the treatment of focal (partial-onset) seizures; it is not approved/recommended for the treatment of DNP.
Overall, cardiovascular diseases were prevalent in the DNP population, as was the use of cardiac, blood pressure, diabetes, and cholesterol-lowering medications among both young and elderly subjects. The most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) for lacosamide monotherapy (200, 400, and 600 mg/day combined) in elderly versus younger subjects were dizziness (16.2% vs. 13.2%), nausea (10.0% vs. 9.4%), and headache (8.0% vs. 8.7%). Incidences of cardiac disorder AEs were higher in elderly versus younger subjects receiving placebo (6.2% vs. 3.9%), lacosamide 200 (4.8% vs. 3.3%), lacosamide 400 (7.0% vs. 4.1%), and lacosamide 600 mg/day (7.7% vs. 4.0%). Discontinuation rates because of any AE in the elderly versus younger subjects were similar for placebo (8.8% vs. 7.0%) and lacosamide 200 mg/day (9.6% vs. 11.9%) and higher for lacosamide 400 (25.1% vs. 10.8%) and lacosamide 600 mg/day (52.7% vs. 28.3%).
Lacosamide monotherapy was well tolerated in elderly subjects with DNP, with an overall AE profile consistent with that reported in epilepsy trials.
评估拉科酰胺单药治疗在老年(≥65岁)糖尿病性神经病变疼痛(DNP)患者中的安全性。
在拉科酰胺单药治疗的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验(NCT00861445、NCT00235469、NCT00238524、NCT00135109、NCT00350103)的1863例DNP患者中,502例为老年人。在这些DNP试验中,将老年患者的安全性数据与年轻患者(<65岁)的进行比较。需要注意的是,拉科酰胺被批准用于治疗局灶性(部分性发作)癫痫;未被批准/推荐用于治疗DNP。
总体而言,心血管疾病在DNP人群中普遍存在,年轻和老年患者中使用心脏、血压、糖尿病和降胆固醇药物的情况也是如此。老年患者与年轻患者相比,拉科酰胺单药治疗(200、400和600mg/天联合)最常报告的不良事件(AE)为头晕(16.2%对13.2%)、恶心(10.0%对9.4%)和头痛(8.0%对8.7%)。接受安慰剂的老年患者与年轻患者相比,心脏疾病AE的发生率更高(6.2%对3.9%),拉科酰胺200mg组(4.8%对3.3%)、拉科酰胺400mg组(7.0%对4.1%)和拉科酰胺600mg/天组(7.7%对4.0%)。老年患者与年轻患者因任何AE导致的停药率在安慰剂组相似(8.8%对7.0%),拉科酰胺200mg/天组(9.6%对11.9%),而拉科酰胺400mg组(25.1%对10.8%)和拉科酰胺600mg/天组(52.7%对28.3%)更高。
拉科酰胺单药治疗在老年DNP患者中耐受性良好,总体AE情况与癫痫试验中报告的一致。