Karstens Sven, Kuithan Pauline, Joos Stefanie, Hill Jonathan C, Wensing Michel, Steinhäuser Jost, Krug Katja, Szecsenyi Joachim
Department of Computer Science; Therapeutic Sciences, Trier University of applied Science, Trier, Germany.
Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 27;18(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2991-3.
The STarT-Back-Approach (STarT: Subgroups for Targeted Treatment) was developed in the UK and has demonstrated clinical and cost effectiveness. Based on the results of a brief questionnaire, patients with low back pain are stratified into three treatment groups. Since the organisation of physiotherapy differs between Germany and the UK, the aim of this study is to explore German physiotherapists' views and perceptions about implementing the STarT-Back-Approach.
Three two-hour think-tank workshops with physiotherapists were conducted. Focus groups, using a semi-structured interview guideline, followed a presentation of the STarT-Back-Approach, with discussions audio recorded, transcribed and qualitatively analysed using content analysis.
Nineteen physiotherapists participated (15 female, mean age 41.2 (SD 8.6) years). Three main themes emerged, each with multiple subthemes: 1) the intervention (15 subthemes), 2) the healthcare context (26 subthemes) and 3) individual characteristics (8 subthemes). Therapists' perceptions of the extent to which the STarT-Back intervention would require changes to their normal clinical practice varied considerably. They felt that within their current healthcare context, there were significant financial disincentives that would discourage German physiotherapists from providing the STarT-Back treatment pathways, such as the early discharge of low-risk patients with supported self-management materials. They also discussed the need for appropriate standardised graduate and post-graduate skills training for German physiotherapists to treat high-risk patients with a combined physical and psychological approach (e.g., communication skills).
Whilst many German physiotherapists are positive about the STarT-Back-Approach, there are a number of substantial barriers to implementing the matched treatment pathways in Germany. These include financial disincentives within the healthcare system to early discharge of low-risk patients. Therapists also highlighted the need for solutions in respect of scalable physiotherapy training to gain skills in combined physical and psychological approaches.
STarT背部治疗法(STarT:靶向治疗亚组)是在英国研发的,已证明具有临床和成本效益。根据一份简短问卷的结果,腰痛患者被分为三个治疗组。由于德国和英国的物理治疗组织方式不同,本研究的目的是探讨德国物理治疗师对实施STarT背部治疗法的看法和认知。
与物理治疗师举办了三次两小时的智囊团研讨会。在介绍STarT背部治疗法之后,采用半结构化访谈指南进行焦点小组讨论,讨论内容进行录音、转录,并使用内容分析法进行定性分析。
19名物理治疗师参与(15名女性,平均年龄41.2(标准差8.6)岁)。出现了三个主要主题,每个主题都有多个子主题:1)干预措施(15个子主题),2)医疗保健背景(26个子主题)和3)个体特征(8个子主题)。治疗师对STarT背部干预措施在多大程度上需要改变他们的正常临床实践的看法差异很大。他们认为,在当前的医疗保健背景下,存在重大的经济阻碍因素,这会使德国物理治疗师不愿提供STarT背部治疗途径,例如低风险患者在获得支持性自我管理材料的情况下提前出院。他们还讨论了有必要为德国物理治疗师提供适当的标准化研究生和研究生后技能培训,以便采用综合身体和心理方法治疗高风险患者(例如沟通技巧)。
虽然许多德国物理治疗师对STarT背部治疗法持积极态度,但在德国实施匹配的治疗途径存在一些重大障碍。这些障碍包括医疗保健系统中对低风险患者提前出院的经济阻碍因素。治疗师还强调需要解决可扩展的物理治疗培训问题,以获得综合身体和心理方法的技能。